Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Monday, May 12, 2008

Cole in Salon: Obama and Clinton on Aljazeera

My column, "Clinton and Obama on Aljazeera," is just out in Salon.com.

It is based in part on an interview I did with the editor-in-chief of Aljazeera during my recent trip to Qatar.

Excerpt:


' Many Americans incorrectly think of Al-Jazeera's Arabic-language network as al-Qaida Central because it occasionally broadcasts excerpts from videotapes of the terror organization's leaders. Nowadays, however, viewers are far more likely to see images of the American presidential candidates on the channel's screens. As the United States, always an interested party, has become a dominant on-the-ground player in the Middle East, residents of the region increasingly feel that their own fate depends on the outcome of this election. I was in Qatar earlier this month and stopped by the office of Ahmed Sheikh, editor in chief of Al-Jazeera's Arabic service, to ask him about his network's coverage of the campaign.

Al-Jazeera's Arabic service studios in the rapidly growing metropolis of Doha have been expanded but are still relatively modest. The facilities at the new English-language Al-Jazeera International across the street are far more state-of-the-art. The correspondent who welcomed me said that when Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak visited, he was taken aback by how small the studio was, remarking, "So this is the matchbox that has caused all that trouble!"

Safely delivered to Sheikh's office, I was plied with strong Arab tea. Soon our conversation turned to the U.S. presidential campaign. Why, I asked, give such distant events air time? "Because the United States is occupying Iraq and it is an ally of Israel and a power broker in the region," Sheikh replied. "The United States is the only superpower on the planet. Events in Iraq and Palestine affect this area." '


Read the whole thing.

Qatar, by the way, is a fascinating country, and is taking on some of the attributes of Dubai, though it isn't as swinging a place as the latter. It is opening its first Catholic church soon!

7 Comments:

At 12:30 PM, Blogger Alamaine said...

"Qatar, by the way, is a fascinating country, and is taking on some of the attributes of Dubai, though it isn't as swinging a place as the latter. It is opening its first Catholic church soon!"

Wait until the Papists get into their groove! The whole country will be a-rockin' and a-rollin'!

 
At 2:07 PM, Anonymous Gregg Gordon said...

From your Salon article:

"Al-Jazeera's coverage of the primary focused on the facts and avoided editorializing, and its interpretation of the meaning of last Tuesday's events was squarely within the mainstream of U.S. political reporting."

Frankly, I had hoped for better from Al-Jazeera. Hate to see them come down to our level.

 
At 7:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I see absolutely no reason why Hillary and Obama should not do an interview with Jazeera. It certainly makes as much sense, and probably a lot more, than Hillary doing Fox. From what little I have seen of Jazeera, it is much more fair and balanced than Fox.

 
At 9:55 PM, Anonymous Ian Thorpe said...

An attitude I encounter among right wing readers who comment on my articles on American politics is "What the hell is it to do with you, Limey."

I think middle America, and particularly the check shirt wearing tendency has not understood that such is the power of the American economy, what happens politically in America affects the lives of everybody in the world.

So yeah, Al Jazeerah are serving their audience by briadcasting the election campaign.

 
At 10:37 PM, Blogger Marshall said...

When I was in Doha, for MENOG-2, I was invited over to Al Jazera, and saw the English language part (that's where their networking people are). It was very impressive, and reminded me of CNN in Atlanta. They have spent a good deal of money (including an STM-1 ring around the planet) to develop a global news organization.

 
At 2:14 AM, Anonymous John Francis Lee said...

Why All of Our Efforts Won't Stop an Attack on Iran

May 9. I read tonight a brief article by Philip Giraldi posted on the American Conservative website: War with Iran Might Be Closer than You Think

“There is considerable speculation,” writes the former CIA officer, “and buzz in Washington today suggesting that the National Security Council has agreed in principle to proceed with plans to attack an Iranian al-Qods [Revolutionary Guards]-run camp that is believed to be training Iraqi militants. The camp that will be targeted is one of several located near Tehran.”

Defense Secretary Robert Gates, according to Giraldi, was the only senior official present urging delay. That suggests that the military is not enthusiastic about a widened war in Southwest Asia, but that the other regular members of the NSC (Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley as well as President Bush and Vice President Cheney) are willing to provoke just that.

They will do what they do with the solid backing of Congress, the presidential candidates, and the mainstream press which if history is our guide will for a time shape shockingly malleable public opinion. Yes, I fear that we (most of us) will be fooled again.

John McCain, Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton (all of whom agree that an attack on Iran is “on the table”) will publicly approve. The media will call upon the same “military analysts”/military industry consultants who have been disseminating Pentagon propaganda for pay since 2002 to explain why the attack is justified and necessary. The main talking-point has been decided: “Iran is killing American soldiers in Iraq.”

A cruise missile strike on an alleged training camp site won’t end there. It will be designed to provoke an Iranian response and legitimate further U.S. attacks, not only on Iran but Syria and Lebanon, probably in coordination with Israel.

 
At 6:43 PM, Blogger jsb said...

"I think middle America, and particularly the check shirt wearing tendency..."

Jesus. A plaid shirt is no indicator. Take your stereotypes back to Europe.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home