Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Friday, July 11, 2008

Bhasin: Maliki and the Timetable: It's all about Blackwater

Madhavi Bhasin writes:

On July 7th the Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki in an Address before the Arab Ambassadors stated that his Government was looking at the necessity of terminating foreign presence on Iraqi land and restoring full sovereignty. The U.S. public diplomacy machinery began operating in full swing after the statement was released and has emerged with a self justifying explanation: the remarks of the Iraqi Prime Minister are reflective of the confidence in the stability and democratic progress of Iraq facilitated through the efforts of the Coalition Forces. The venue and timing of the comments are being considered crucial. The regional concerns over Iraq’s stability were expected to be put at rest, while convincing the local population of the independence of the Iraqi regime ahead of elections in autumn.

The more serious considerations behind the demand to begun negotiations for a withdrawal strategy and date have evaded popular attention.

In September 2007, 17 Iraqis died as a result of unjustified and unprovoked shooting at the Nisour Square. Personnel of Blackwater Worldwide, a private agency contracted by the U.S. to operate in Iraq, were involved in the shooting. A week later the Iraqi Government revoked the license of Blackwater to operate in the country. In the last week of September, Blackwater received a contract worth up to $92 million from the U.S. State Department. In April 2008 the assignment to provide personal protection for diplomats in Iraq by Blackwater has been renewed for the third year. The FBI is still investigating the killings at Nisour Square; more than 30 witnesses have been questioned and three Iraqis have testified before the Federal Grand Jury in May 2008. Neither the lives of the ordinary Iraqis nor the decisions of the Iraqi Government were taken into consideration while renewing the contracts for Blackwater.

“This is bad news,” Sami al-Askari, advisory to Prime Minister Maliki said, “I personally am not happy with this, especially because they have committed acts of aggression, killed Iraqis, and this has not been resolved yet positively for families of victims.” The neglect of such crucial Iraqi concerns by the U.S. has in fact prompted the demand for withdrawing foreign troops from Iraqi soil.

The Nisour Square killing is not an isolated incident. In February 2007 a Blackwater sniper shot three Iraqi guards, without provocation, ironically from the terrace of the Iraqi Justice Ministry. In October 2007 a Blackwater personnel was so heavily drunk that he killed the bodyguard of the Iraqi Vice-President. In the same month an Iraqi civilian was shot for simply driving too close to the State Department convoy.

The Iraqi Government has come to realize that the U.S. is attempting to run the Iraqi state through private contractors who cannot be held accountable for their misdeeds. The Report from the American Congressional Research Service in July 2007 clearly indicated that the Iraqi government has no authority over private security firms contracted by the U.S. Government. A shocking incident in the Green Zone in 2006 has demonstrated that the Blackwater personnel have gained greater impunity than the regular U.S. armed forces. A SUV driven by Blackwater operatives had crashed into a U.S. Army Humvee. The Blackwater guards disarmed the army soldiers and forced them to lie on the ground at gunpoint until the vehicle was recovered.

Erik Prince, the founder of Blackwater has been a major financial supporter of the Republican Party. Hence Republican Presidential candidate John McCain is an obvious supporter of Blackwater. Even Democratic Presidential candidate Barak Obama has refused to rule out the deployment of private security companies in Iraq. Prime Minister Maliki has realized that the continued U.S. occupation of Iraq is a lucrative business venture for the American private firms like the Blackwater Worldwide. Echoing the popular sentiment the Iraqi Foreign Minister stated that there will not be ‘another colonization of Iraq.’ This is precisely the reason that Iraq has demanded more time for discussions on the Status of Forces Agreement with the U.S.

The mission statement of Blackwater Worldwide reads: “Blackwater efficiently and effectively integrates a wide range of resources and core competencies to provide unique and timely solutions that exceed our customers stated needs and expectations”. The poorly equipped yet struggling indigenous Iraqi forces might be no match for the Blackwater, but it will surely be a national armed force serving and remaing accountable to the Iraqi people.

The demand of Prime Minister Maliki is less reflective of his confidence in the stability of Iraq and more a sign of the growing apprehensions over the privatization of the Iraqi reconstruction efforts.


Madhavi Bhasin is a Doctoral Researcher at the Jadavpur University, India. Her research areas include conflict resolution, South Asia and Middle East. Currently based in California and working on Indo-U.S. Missile Defense Cooperation and India's Public Diplomacy Strategy.

Labels:

9 Comments:

At 9:05 AM, Blogger Christiane said...

It's all about Blackwater
Is it ? People like to find single cause to complicated problems. I'd rephrase this into : it is also about Blackwater. Granted, this contractor thing is dangerous. The US does it because :
1) It help them hide part of the casualties (they aren't counted, with the KIA, because they aren't members of the army). Does anyone know how many contractors have died during the Iraq war ? Iraq casualties tries to number them, but I'm sure it's very incomplete.
2) These contractors can be of any nationalities.. If they die, no problem, they aren't Americans.
3) It allows huge war benefits for several contractor firms.. did you say war profiteers ? Some are friends of the actual government (IE Halliburton).
4) It allows them to externalize a large part of the US Army works.. thus hiding part of the importance of the US engagement in Iraq.
4) Last but not least, these contractors are not accountable to anyone, thus it is easy to externalize dirty work to them (remember private contractors played a role in the Abu Graib scandal).

No surprise that the Iraqi government doesn't appreciate them. However I don't think that the unaccountability of the private contractors is the only reason preventing the signing of a SOFA between the US government and the Iraqi one. It's the occupation as a whole, which the Iraqi don't want to support longer and it is the pressure of the opinion and of the high clerics on Al'Maliki which has prompted his recent assertions.

 
At 9:17 AM, Blogger Jeremy said...

It would be ironic if the US is booted out of Iraq because of its short-sighted employment of private thugs in Iraq. The last thing the world needs is a huge privatized military; and we need to put an end to such organizations asap.

 
At 9:42 AM, Blogger Da' Buffalo Amongst Wolves said...

No worries Blackwater has been scouting the NGOs for work

 
At 12:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Today is another when I cry a little for all of this unnecessary death and destruction and lawlessness. There's more than a little irony in the fact that I seem a bit peculiar for it.
I don't know how you can keep at this every day, Professor Cole.
I appreciate your efforts to keep the realities before us even though it would seem that it doesn't alter the course of events one whit. It certainly doesn't move the criminals who permit and perpetrate this horror nor those who happily employ Blackwater services.
I was unaware that Obama had not ruled out the use of these mercenaries.
That guy disappoints day after day on so many levels...this is one of the most stunning, though.

 
At 3:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

A shocking incident in the Green Zone in 2006 has demonstrated that the Blackwater personnel have gained greater impunity than the regular US armed forces. A SUV driven by Blackwater operatives had crashed into a US Army Humvee. The Blackwater guards disarmed the army soldiers and forced them to lie on the ground at gunpoint until the vehicle was recovered.

Are You F***ing Kidding Me !?!?!

these GIs should be brought on charges of cowardice !!!

they should have GUNNED DOWN the blackwater mercenary SCUM out of principle !!!!

as a matter of fact, if i were still in the military as a combat infantryman, my FIRST, LAST and ONLY targets would be any mercenary scum that i came across. they are evil filthy scum and should be immediately removed from Iraq and all other places on this planet.

and the usa sheeple had better wake up to the fact that the us government is allowing and funding the blackwater scum to become a heavily armed private army, with a nasty religious bent.

allowing themselves to be disarmed and held at gunpoint by blackwater filth ??? COME ON !!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
At 4:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I was unaware that Obama had not ruled out the use of these mercenaries.

He can't rule out the use of mercs unless he 1) commits to removing the US presence from Iraq OR 2) commits to re-instating the draft OR 3) lies.

The US military does not have the people to be able to do what this administration has been trying to do in Iraq and Afghanistan. They didn't have the people in 2002 and they don't have the numbers now. The only way to keep the US presence in Iraq is through the continued use of mercs like Blackwater (which is part of the reason why they're still there even after the Iraqis have demanded that they be gone multiple times - logistically the US can't stop using them without leaving Iraq.)

The volunteer US military was not built for this kind of adventure, and it certainly wasn't built for Rumsfeld's theories on how to wage war "on the cheap". That's why the mercs are needed and why they aren't going anywhere until the US itself is gone as well.

 
At 7:28 PM, Blogger workshop said...

Here's the money line in your column:

" Even Democratic Presidential candidate Barak Obama has refused to rule out the deployment of private security companies in Iraq."

Neither 'major' party offers a meaningful and plausible way forward in Iraq.

 
At 8:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The US does it because :
They need the training so when they come back to Amerika they be ready.
jo6pac
How Sad

 
At 11:30 PM, Anonymous John Francis Lee said...

Does it really matter to the Iraqis if they dispossessed, humiliated, and murdered by the hired thugs of Blackwater or the impressed helots of the regular US armed forces.

That we have allowed "our" government to enslave, for that's what 'stop loss' is, our 'volunteer' army in pursuit of its criminal aggression while enriching an overarching class, of American-Taleban Uebermen is another stain on our "democracy".

I am heartened to see more disillusionment with BO, the $215,000,000 Corporate Man.

I am especially encouraged that it's been allowed to be posted.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home