Will Afghanistan Violence hurt McCain Campaign?
Afghan guerrillas used small arms fire to down a US helicopter south of Kabul. The crew was unharmed. More US & coalition troops were killed in Afghanistan in May and June than in Iraq.
Meanwhile, guerrillas used a roadside bomb to kill 5 Afghan troops in Logan, central Afghanistan. There was also a major firefight between the Afghan army and a group characterized as "Taliban" in Badghis in the northwest.
David Corn at Mother Jones asks if Afghanistan will explode as a campaign issue in the US, and whether that development will harm the prospects of John McCain, who has instead put his eggs in the Iraq basket. Barack Obama has argued that the US should have focused on al-Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan instead.
Things are not going well in Pakistan, either, where the new government is quickly squandering its credibility. There are questions about whether it is fighting or dealing with the Pakistani Taliban. The issue of the reinstatement of the Supreme Court remains unresolved, splitting the government.
And then there is the looming crisis in Turkey, where favorability ratings for the US in polls have fallen from nearly three fifths of the population to almost no one.
Aljazeera English on the struggle between secularism and Muslim-tinged politics in Turkey:


1 Comments:
ref : “More US & coalition troops were killed in Afghanistan in May and June than in Iraq.”
You will recall that there was a time when we described the AngloAmerican IRAQ Occupation troops as being caught in a "Whac-A-Mole" dynamic with guerrilla forces of various kinds in different parts of the country; ie., we'd whack them in one part of the country ~ only to have them pop up in another town or province...
...and it was damn frustrating. Finally, the Americans, stretched all too thinly for all intents and purposes shrank back into a defensive posture in Baghdad City (about the time that Shi'ite militants had ethnically over-run the place, "surge" or no "surge" strategy being altogether irrelevant, imho).
Anyhoo, the lessons learned from "Whac-A-Mole" = asymmetric warfare in IRAQ was that it takes a heluva lot of troops to be an omnipresent occupation force, and that in lieu of having the support of the native population: the only way to "win" this game is to refuse to play it.
in that regard, We have tended to separate ‘IRAQ’ from ‘AFGHANISTAN’, literally as well as militarily ~ when, indeed ~ they are for US and THEM quite the same Global War On Terror, n'est-ce pas? And as we could easily say that "operations in the Kurdish north" = Mosul are different than those in the Shi'ite south = Basra part of IRAQ, being different than, say the Tora Bora region between Afghanistan and Pakistan...
...iow, the point is: insofar as the U.S. military is concerned, "the deployment" is not just Baghdad, or IRAQ, it's Over There for the soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines in combat; and we should perhaps make more of an effort Over Here to aggregate metrics for THE WAR, apparent ~ just as we do/did for ‘World War II’; and we should think of it / report about it more globally, Professor.
Post a Comment
<< Home