Bombers hit Karbala Pilgrims for Third Straight Day
Bombers struck at Shiite pilgrims for the third straight day on Sunday, killing as many as six new victims. This despite extensive security measures in the holy city of Karbala.
The city was divided into eight districts, with checkpoints and body searches. Teams of female inspectors checked women for bombs. US and Iraqi aircraft did continual aerial surveillance. This according to the Arabic press.
AFP also reports that in Baghdad's Jadid district, Iraqi forces arrested the head of an Awakening Council for involvement in terrorism and conducted a raid on guerrillas so that 250 displaced persons could return to the neighborhood.
My guess is that this translates that at least some members of the Sunni Awakening Council had earlier been involved in ethnically cleansing Shiites, and that the al-Maliki government is now cracking down on it so that some Shiite families can safely return. The US views the Awakening Councils as valuable anti-al-Qaeda paramilitaries willing to take American money to fight the Qutbist vigilantes.
The Justice Department is going to probe the notorious Nisur Square shooting by Blackwater security guards last September in Baghdad that left 17 civilians dead, and for which, in the aftermath, there did not seem to be any real security justification.
There have reportedly been serious tensions between the Kurdish Peshmerga paramilitary in Diyala Province and the Iraqi army. There are conflicting reports on whether the Peshmerga will withdraw. The Kurdistan Regional Government claims the northern part of Diyala for itself because of its Kurdish population, though the province as a whole has an Arab majority.
Mark Kukis of Time explains why Iraq is still oil poor.
The majority of Britain's 4,000 combat troops in southern Iraq will be withdrawn by next May. Along with the loss of 2,000 Georgian troops in Wasit Province, these withdrawals will affect the drawn-down of US troops originally planned for this year.
Abu Muqawamah on fixing the Iraqi elections: "On Dr. iRack's recent Iraq voyage, many U.S. commanders, coalition officials, and Iraqis expressed growing concerns that the "Powers That Be" (Dawa, ISCI, the IIP, PUK, and KDP) will use their monopoly on official power--including their dominance of governors, provincial councils, and the Iraqi Security forces--to tilt the provincial elections in their favor against the "Powers That Aren't" (the Sadrists, Awakening groups, independents, and secularists). This is problematic since the entire goal of the elections is to co-opt the latter into the political process, and, by giving them a stake in the system and peaceful means of sharing power, help solidify the security gains from the surge."
Obama interview in Stars and Stripes.
Labels: Iraq

|
8 Comments:
If the US doesn't get an extension to the UN mandate and no SOFA and must then leave by 1 JAN 2009, then why do the Brits get to stay longer as they're governed by the same mandate?
Kurdistan is two regions in reality. Talabani in Sulaymania and Barazani in Arbil (Dukok has a tiny population and is mainly under Arbil's control.)
There are two ministries for each of: Peshmerga; Finance; and Interior in Kurdistan, but the others are unified.
It seems that Talabani is trying the Peshmerga = Iraqi Army yarn, while Barazani has agreed to withdraw as part of his new, comical, charm offensive.
Re: tensions between the Iraqi Army and the Kurdish Peshmerga in Diyala
I work for an NGO that operates in Diyala province - and the only reason why Khanaqin is relatively safe is because peshmerga forces control the area. The Kurdish forces have not conducted ethnic cleansing or put pressure on Arabs living in Khanaqin to leave - as has happened in Kirkuk. So far, ethnic conflict has not occurred between Kurds and Arabs in Khanaqin. (In fact we employ an Arab professional in Khanaqin who has not been subjected to any discrimination or threat, and we serve Arab IDPs in the town.)
Maliki is working to assert central control. This is not playing well with the Kurds, and may spark a backlash in Khanaqin, which until now has been a relatively tolerant and safe town -particularly compared to the horror that is the rest of Diyala province.
Areas that contain a large majority of Kurds (such as Khanaqin) should probably be incorporated into the KRG even at the risk of redrawing provincial boundaries. These boundaries have already been redrawn -the current boundaries of Dohuk and Ninevah were redrawn, for example.
Kirkuk city is another matter, and requires careful negotiation. But it seems to me very foolish and probably unworkable to ask the peshmerga to withdraw from Khanaqin, given that Kurds are a supermajority, given that there is minimal if any coercion against other enthicities, and given that the town is safe enought for foreigners such as me to actually visit without armed guards.
I'm hoping the Maliki government leaves well enough alone. I'm not going to be traveling to Khanaqin if the people manning the checkpoints are Sahwa partisans or Arab troops of unknown affiliation or loyalty, versus the Kurdish forces that have kept the area relatively secure so far.
"Qutbist"?
Happy days.
I was less than convinced by Abu Muqawama's piece. It was just a repeat of a lot of stuff coming out since June which is trying to point up divisions in Iraq. This PTB vs PTA material. I think it is because the principal informants are Americans in the Green Zone.
I have no doubt that some kind of PTB vs PTA struggle is taking place; it always does. The issue is its relative importance.
You have to remember that the Americans in the Green Zone are desperately trying to divert attention from the fact that they are losing on the SOFA negotiations. Trying to create divisions among the Iraqis. This story is entirely on that line.
Stars and Stripes link:
http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=56694
"These boundaries have already been redrawn -the current boundaries of Dohuk and Ninevah were redrawn, for example. "
They were redrawn under military occupation ... so the redraw will be undone after the occupation ends.
"given that Kurds are a supermajority"
They are a super majority now after coercion and military intervention of the peshmerga which has gone unchallenged and was supported by the Americans because of their treason.
"and given that the town is safe enought for foreigners such as me to actually visit without armed guards. "
Really you want the Iraqi's to redraw their maps based on how safe it would make you ? Wouldn't it be easier for you to leave ?
And what NGO works in Iraq ? Are you a christian charity foundation or what ?
Arab world sees usa's response to Georgia - Russia crisis as hypocritical
The US president should be 'too ashamed to speak about the occupation of any country, he is already occupying one,' one observer says.
Post a Comment
<< Home