Mourning Rally Biggest Demonstration Since Monday in Tehran;
Khamenei to Address Nation
Thursday's march in Tehran was just enormous, several hundred thousand strong. AFP writes, "Many in the huge crowd walked silently and lit black candles as night fell. Others wore green wristbands or ribbons and carried flowers as they filed into Imam Khomeini Square, a large plaza in the heart of the capital named for the founder of the Islamic Revolution, witnesses said." The marchers wore black to show their mourning for the dozen reformers killed by security forces on Monday. Mir-Hosain Mousavi, whom the crowd has adopted as their leader, addressed them briefly.
BBC has video of the gargantuan "mourning day of protest".
And here is a slide show.
See also the eyewitness account in the next posting.
AFP estimated the size of the demonstration as similar to the one on Monday. Some reporters thought a million people came out on Monday, though I prefer to be conservative on crowds, since it is easy to overestimate their size. Several hundred thousand, perhaps half a million, would be impressive enough. Such massive numbers of discontented urbanites tell you that change may well be in the air. The 2006 demonstration by an estimated 500,000 people in Los Angeles against immigration restrictions on Latinos (a la Tom Tancredo et al.) was in retrospect a harbinger of big trouble for the Republican Party in national US politics.
Back to Iran. AFP says, ' "The demonstrators marched silently until they reached the central square, where some chanted "Death to the dictator!" a witness said. Another said protesters also warned the government: "We will not get exhausted and we will come every day." '
The clerical hierarchy is itself increasingly split. It might have been expected that disgraced Grand Ayatollah Husayn Ali Montazeri, now under house arrest, would issue a letter in support of the protests. (Montazeri was once heir apparent to Imam Ruhollah Khomeini but his criticisms of regime practices and of clerical dictatorship led to his marginalization and ultimately arrest.) But former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani is alleged to be trying to drum up support for Mousavi among senior clerics in the holy city of Qom. There are persistent rumors that reformist Ayatollah Yusuf Sani'i has given legal rulings that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is not president of Iran.
The protesters hope that President Obama will maintain his relative silence on the movement, lest he unintentionally tar them with the brush of imperialist stooges.
The regime, surely fearing a popular revolution of the sort that toppled the shah in 1978-79, is using carrots and sticks to try to deal with an unpredictable situation. So far, however, both inducements and crackdowns have been a pittance. Several hundred protest leaders have been arrested, but when you've got hundreds of thousands out in the streets every day, a few hundred arrests don't mean much and clearly aren't intimidating anyone. In fact, they backfire by angering the protesters and ensuring they return the next day. The arrest of ailing former foreign minister Ibrahim Yazdi at his hospital was particularly cruel. Some rumors have it that the regime was forced to release him back to the hospital, so poor is his health.
Babak Rahimi, in Tehran, sees the situation as being as unpredictable as that of fall 1978 when it was not apparent whether the shah would survive or the regime would fall.
The regime announced two new steps in response on Thursday. The Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei will deliver the Friday Prayer Sermon later today, and is rumored to be planning to call for an end to protests and to threaten a harsh crackdown if he is not obeyed.
Aljazeera English has a good report today on the conflict between Khamenei and his former backer, Rafsanjani.
At the same time, all four presidential contenders have been invited to a meeting on Saturday with the Guardianship Council, which has been asked to reexamine ballot boxes for signs of fraud. The regime seems to think that the protests are occurring because the alleged losers are stirring them up. In fact, the crowds are way out ahead of the leaders. The things you hear about how Khamenei plans to deal with this crisis are so far not very promising. Ultimately, I think a compromise is being demanded of him, like a complete ballot recount or a new presidential election, that he cannot grant without so weakening his authority that he may lose it anyway. In such a game, he may think he has a better chance maintaining the regime by offering limited concessions coupled with a crack down on the stubborn. He may or may not be right about that.
Aljazeera English on Iran's citizen journalists.
A long, detailed, eyewitness account of the crisis from a perceptive reformist is here..
End/ (Not Continued)

|
9 Comments:
If push came to shove, I think the people would push back harder. This regime as others, think they can decapitate and intimidate the opposition. So far they have held back their big guns. If the pull them out, there will be a general insurrection, including a great deal of fire, shooting and death, but short lived. The regime will fall or the military will step in. Either way, the islamic state will be crippled. I have great hopes. This uprising was unlooked for. In the past, the middle class has tamely retired to their shopping malls and sattelite TV. I am glad to finaly see some backbone. What emerges from can't be as bad as what currently exists. Iran has too much capacity, history and brain power to let this go to waste.
The government of the Islamic Republic of Iran is complex mix of democracy and theocracy. There are 6 major bodies in the government. The President, Assembly of Experts, and Parliament are directly elected. The Cabinet is chosen by the President and approved by the parliament. The Supreme Leader is appointed by the Assembly of Experts and removable by the same. The Guardian Council is composed of 12 members, 6 of which are appointed by the Supreme Leader and six appointed by the Head of the Judiciary that are approved by parliament. The Assembly of Experts and Guardian Council effectively ensure that clerics maintain a grip on power, since those two bodies, together, have veto power on all candidates and all legislation.
In my opinion, the protests in Iran come from an alliance of two camps. There are the reformers, who want to maintain the current constitutional government, but want it modified. There are also those who would like to change the whole system, bringing an end to the theocratic elements in the government. While the current system could be modified to make it secular, this would probably take many years, and my suspicion is that many do not want to wait that long. I think this latter camp wants revolution, not reform.
According to Forbes, Ayatollah Rafsanjani is one of the richest men in Iran. Additionally he is the Chairman of the Assembly of Experts. I have no doubt he is in a power struggle with the Supreme Leader Khamenei and his proxy Ahmadinejad. However, he stands to lose all of his power, and potentially most of his wealth if there was a revolution. I can see him using the current situation to increase his power, but I seriously doubt he will jeopardize his power to help a revolution.
Many of us who are hoping for a good outcome in Iran hear cautions against an adverse reaction to any US action, or word from Obama. That reasonable caution usually either hopes or assumes that we can somehow escape the perception that the US could, would and/or is meddling.
Consider the location of our armies, in shooting wars that include ops against what we declare to be IRG/Quds proxies. Our nuclear fleets operate up to (and historically inside) Iranian waters, while our powerful diplomatic machine tries to set conditions for increased economic attacks on their country. Before the smoke cleared in Gaza, Likud hawks were 'elected' to replace Olmert in the 'bomb Iran' debate. That stuff all looms large, seen thru Iranian field glasses.
I see a broad domestic US lack of curiosity re whether we kept hands off the election and protests.That assumption should be questioned here. Whatever actions this or the last admin took, the opposite perception prevails abroad. A benign 'hands off' America is laughably absurd to Iran government supporters, who are numerous, vocal. They are backed by a lethal national security state which IS being threatened, at home and abroad.
Khameini made good use of US containment ops on his borders, and the peculiar US-Israel-Georgia initiative, in a mass pep rally, held in the face of Tehran U. God bless CSPAN for carrying it live, in toto. The supremo-for-life had them jumping to their feet, chanting and saluting, without breaking a sweat himself. It was instructive in how to sell the big lie. And it must have been frightening for the student opposition, with their campus occupied by mobilized zealots and Khameini's security team.
May Allah have mercy on the prisoners and their families. The revolutionary guard has tortured grand ayatollahs and shot prime ministers. One whack on the skull is all it takes to kill the likes of Steve Biko.
The political system in Iran is, what(?): Byzantine, convoluted, obscure. The Council of Guardians selects the Supreme Commander who selects the Council of Guardians. Perhaps the people want change.
Look guys, the Shah is dead. He's not coming back. The CIA, well, CIA coups mostly fail. Success is accidental. George Tenet was CIA chief. So was the man who fathered W. I rest my case.
Perhaps the silent marches should continue. Nothing scarier to a bunch of old men than a few million of their most productive citizens marching in silent determination.
Theocracies do not work. It does not work in Israel. It does not work in Alabama. It did not work in Hitler's Germany (Mein Fuhrer as infallible). Kim Jung is ill.
Perhaps the people should have more say in selecting their guardians.
Khamenei has basically repeated what he has been saying before, but more menacingly.
He has virtually done a Bush: "bring'em on" and "handful of dead-enders" etc. But Bush was fully in charge, and Khamenei isn't. He threw down the gauntlet at Rafsanjani et al, as well as many millions of hostile Iranians.
The other (reformists) camp must now decide how to respond. It seems to me that capitulation is out of the question: they would lose their big chance, and the protesters may well ignore them and carry on regardless.
If confrontation is inevitable, then the downfall of Khamenei is the most likely outcome. True, the IRGC are on his side, but they can easily flip. In fact they helped the US in Bosnia and still have good channels. They are more of a mafia now rather than a militia.
I was very struck by that there were absolutely no women that I could see in the bussed in crowd of Nejad supporters for Khameini's speech.
I think the regime is doomed.
Muslim women have power, even when it is invisible to fundamentalists.
You really need to move more quickly. Why nothing on the speech? Khameini is going for broke, he is going to force a bloody confrontation.
Rafsanjani could have an alternative answer: Team up with Ahmadinejad if he can get his support to dump Khamenei:
http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2009/06/time-four-endgames-on-iran-misses-no-5.html
Today, in his speech, Khamenei I think made clear this is ultimately about a showdown between him and Rafsanjani, anyway, beyond the presidential election:
http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2009/06/khamenei-charges-rafsanjani-corruption.html
Why do you call Montazeri "disgraced" ? It carries such negative connotations, when he was removed as successor because he stood up on principle, even to his friend and teacher.
You should be much more careful with your use of words.
Post a Comment
<< Home