Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

Silverman: Drought, Agriculture, and Social Problems in Iraq

Adam L. Silverman, PhD, writes in a guest op-ed for IC:

The crippling sandstorms in Iraq, which disrupted the trip to that country of Vice President Joe Biden last weekend, underline the challenges confronting Iraq in the wake of two years of drought. The dry spell and poor policy choices have also, of course, badly affected agriculture. While deployed in Iraq, my teammates and I were stationed in a primarily agricultural area and we spent a lot of time, pre-mission and during the mission, studying agricultural issues in order to support our brigade’s economic and reconstruction initiatives. From that primary and secondary source research we learned that a significant issue for Iraq’s ongoing development is the lack of an active agricultural sector. While this is part of the larger problem with drought in the region, as well as food disruptions that got a fair amount of press coverage in 2008, the Iraqi problem set goes beyond the issue of access to food.

There are four overlapping areas that need to be tracked regarding agricultural disruption in Iraq. The first is the regional dynamic: both Turkey and Iran, in an attempt to deal with the effects of the drought, are drawing down the water supplies that ultimately run into Iraq, further depleting the water available for Iraqi usage. This is a problem of regional politics and stability. If Iraq is deprived of its fair share of water, it creates a new set of grievances that are ripe for exploitation and can further destabilize the region. While the US, the Iraqis, and their neighbors have invested a lot of time into the resolution of this problem, failure to settle it quickly, effectively, and definitively could have negative repercussions.

The second set of issues has to do with the actual physical terrain of Iraq. A great deal of Iraq’s breadbasket, where agriculture was essentially invented, is notable for two things: 1) a high saline content in the soil that is pushed down, locked in, and reduced through regular, repeated, and rotated planting of crops and 2) the use of canal and sluice irrigation – akin to the acequias of the Southwestern US and of Spain. The low river levels because of the drought makes it that much harder to get water into the irrigation canals, which in turn affects the ability to plant crops and mitigate the salinity issue. For each planting cycle that is missed because of lack of available water, the salinity levels increase, meaning that once water becomes available for planting it will take several years of planting “throw away” crops before anything can be produced that is usable. Additionally, the ongoing soil erosion leads to further desertification and increased heat and dust storms, which has a measurable negative impact on the quality of life of the Iraqis.

The third major issue is economic. Since the amount of water available is limited, placing a real limit on the amount of agricultural product that can be produced by the Iraqis, fruits, vegetables, and fish have to be imported. In our interviews with the Iraqi population of our Operating Environment (OE) we were repeatedly told that not only are the local produce and fish superior in taste, but that much of these food stuffs now have to be imported from Iran. Given that many Iraqis, both Shii and Sunni, accurately recognize that the Government of Iraq is being run by exile or domestic based political movements that were established, supported, or funded by Iran, the reliance on food imported from Iran also enhances the common Iraqi boogeyman: that the Iranians are trying to control everything. This is the Iraqi equivalent of the black helicopter fear for some Americans – it is used to explain away bad things that have no readily identifiable explanation.

The final issue, an outgrowth of the predictable economic concerns of higher food prices and lack of income is the human impact. The disruption to Iraq’s agricultural sector is also a major cause of disruption to the community and communal life of Iraq. Moreover, the lack of these traditional forms of employment, especially in the districts and provinces that ring Baghdad, contributed to the flight of individuals to the large cities, or even the smaller towns. This in turn overwhelmed the almost nonexistent social services. The influx of large numbers of Iraqis seeking employment, or just sheltering with more well off family members, is a major contributing factor to the political violence in Iraq. As is so often the case people moved to the more populous areas looking for work, but there was none. Or they fled violence in the cities and established themselves on largely empty land in more rural economic areas. In both cases this created Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) issues that exacerbated existing grievances, especially along sectarian lines.

Additionally, the displaced are more likely to seek any form of income and therefore become biographically available for recruitment to commit negative acts. Essentially the agricultural crisis has created an artificial life course for terrorism and political violence in Iraq. Large numbers of unemployed men, especially young men, many nursing resentments, are willing to take money to feed and house themselves and their families to build or emplace improvised explosive devices. It is from the same pool of desperate young men that the politically or religiously dogmatic interest entrepreneurs recruit their suicide bombers. One of the key solutions to the political violence problem in Iraq is to get the agricultural sector functioning again. By doing so it would function like a pressure release valve, drawing people from the cities and towns back to their villages, settlements, and farms, reducing the available pool of individuals for recruitment, reducing the potential for political violence over property and resources, and increasing the potential for the alleviation of the economic crisis in Iraq.

A key dilemma is that in order to fix the agricultural problem you have to fix the water problem, which is contingent on fixing the power problem – you can not pump water through the canal system without consistent electrical power generation. As a result of decisions made by the Coalition Provisional Authority and continued by the Iraqi Transition Assistance Office to leave rebuilding and renovation of the Iraqi power system to the Iraqis and the private sector over the next ten years, there is only so much that the US military and their civilian agency allies can do to alleviate the problem and the resulting societal pressure.

-
Adam L. Silverman, PhD is the Social Science Advisor for Strategic Communications and a Staff Social Scientist for the US Army Human Terrain System and was the Field Social Scientist and Socio-Cultural Advisor for the 2BCT/1AD assigned to Human Terrain Team Iraq 6 in 2008. The views expressed here are his alone and do not necessarily reflect those of the US Army’s Human Terrain System, the US Army’s Training and Doctrine Command, the 2BCT/1AD, and/or the US Army.

End/ (Not Continued)

7 Comments:

At 3:21 AM, Anonymous Alex_no said...

Juan, you really have to stop giving space to Silverman. Silverman is a fatally naive young man who worked in al-Mada'in, if I remember correctly, who offended a lot of people in my circles, by not bothering about trivia like knowing about Iraqi law.

Here, he has got some stuff, not too much, out of Western economic works. Iraqis have made "poor policy choices". This is what this piece is all about. I mean, it is not as though he is bothering about small points such as his army is occupying the country, and thus preventing proper economic development.

He is also quite wrong about agricultural development not having taken place. The agricultural sector in the area I work on has expanded vastly in the last years.

The basic agricultural problems in Iraq are:

1) The war and occupation. This is not what you might think, but rather the paralysing effect the occupation has had on local government, so no good policies can be applied.

2) The catastrophic decline in the levels of the Tigris and the Euphrates, half of what it was 20 years ago. This is not a question of this year's drought, but rather the long-term issue of the construction in Turkey of multiple dams on the two rivers, plus the Syrian one. There have been negotiations this year between Iraq and Turkey.

The rest of the problem is the unusual natural environment in southern and central Iraq, which Dr Silverman is now reading up on, and is giving us his reading notes on. Unfortunately, all he's reading is American, with its natural Orientalist superiority.

 
At 3:43 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
Certainly when plotting Human Terrain, one must consider the perceptions of those being charted ?

I was an infantryman for many years. I thought of the US Army as an institution designed to deter adversaries through our capacity to kill and destroy.
Now the good Doctor explains that the US Army is also a socially conscious and sensitive organization that wants to get to know the local population better so that the Army can better meet their needs.

......

I'm one of the "dead-enders" Rumsfeld griped about, unable to see all the good that the war achieved for the Iraqi people.
I cannot even bring myself to acknowledge the "success" of the Surge. What was it supposed to accomplish, and did it accomplish that, I ask those who tout its success.
Yes, I am also one of the few who says we lost the Iraq War. I look at what the war was supposed to accomplish, and not even Michael O'Hanlon can convince me that we accomplished those objectives.

The loss of the Iraq War was sealed in February 2003, before the first American tank crossed the border into Iraq. That's when the Huntsville office of the US Army Corps of Engineers awarded contracts (delivery orders, technically) to 4 EOD companies to take care of captured enemy munitions: ECC, PWT, one I can't remember, and Zapata Engineering.
The Contracting Officer authorized these companies to hire Mercenaries to protect their EOD technicians.
Within 30 days, these 4 companies had established a set of protocols for dealing with the hazards of driving through Iraqi villages:
pedal to the metal, and fire up anything that moves, as well as anything that doesn't move.

......

Iraqis don't distinguish between US soldiers and US contractors. To an Iraqi whose daughter was killed on one of these "thunder runs," we are all sadistic animals.
The mission was to topple Saddam and then win hearts and minds, but the second part was made impossible by the actions of those Mercenaries.

........

Dr. Silverman was operating on a military team, attached or opcon or otherwise affiliated with a Brigade Combat Team. I don't know what level of interaction he had with the local population, but I hope it was minimal.
If he was assessing the human terrain in order to advise soldiers or commanders, well, that's pretty smart.
But if he was part of a military unit that was "teaching" the local farmers how to farm, or "teaching" the local health care workers how to deliver health care, then he was helping contribute to the strategic loss in Iraq. In the same way, PRT's contribute to local tactical successes and a larger strategic loss.
Much better for US civilian organizations to be interacting with the local population in efforts to provide development or reconstruction aid.
Even better would be to have International Organizations or NGO's deliver the assistance.
Best would be to have Iraqis from the local community managing the effort (not as lackeys for a US Army-run effort.)

........


As you look at that human terrain, Dr. Silverman, do you note that the locals hate and fear and distrust the US military ?

and I'm just an avid student
.

 
At 6:01 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

As an Iraqi, this oped makes me sick. Dr Adam L. Silverman, presents the US occupation as the solution, when it is the problem:

1) The collapse of the Iraqi state in 2003 left it helpless in all its disputes with its neighbors, including water.

2) The Iraqi scum the US installed in the GreenZone is naturally inept and corrupt. The current Agriculture Minister is not only clueless, he is a sick man who stays at home or in hospital most of the time.

3) Iraq is packed with Agriculture graduates, including those with PhD from the finest western universities, who are unemployed selling cheap sigarettes on side-walks. We have an American social scientist, plus purely military US personnel goofing around to "solve" Iraq's problem instead of letting the Iraqi experts in.

4) The Iraqis have been dealing successfully with salinity for 5 thousand years, droughts and all. Now the sector has collapsed after the invasion of a crusading army with deep racial and religious hatred for the natives: does that tell you something?

 
At 10:23 AM, Blogger Helena Cobban said...

Silverman gives a rather one-sided view of he undoubted environmental crisis in Iraq when he fails to note the role played in provoking it by the power that has held Iraq under belligerent military occupation to use the technical term for this), for the past six years.

This article in Zaman (that Juan linked to yesterday) reported that "more than half the Green Belt that had been established since 1983 has now been destroyed [in recent years]."

 
At 1:17 PM, Anonymous lidia said...

"The mission was to topple Saddam and then win hearts and minds, but the second part was made impossible by the actions of those Mercenaries"

yes, sure, and USA army itself would be showered with sweets, right? As if USA army does not have a long and sordid history of dirty colonial wars (even BEFORE the USA itself was founded).

I bet that Vietnamese LOVED USA army (long before "Mercenaries")

One could expect more insight from "avid student"

 
At 12:07 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
Lidia,

if I understand you correctly, you question the capacity of the US Army to do good.

Having enlisted at the tail end of the Vietnam war, and later having served as an infantry officer, I have some perspective on this question.

Certainly the leadership cadre of the Army, consisting of the senior NCO's, senior officers and General officer corps, suffers from its share of amoral careerists, as I assume the institutions you have been associated with similarly suffer.

If it was only up to them (the amoral ones; there are others in the cadre who are good and honorable) the US Army would be likewise amoral, and evince no sign of conscience. Often, in times of war, it can appear that they have the upper hand.

As an example, consider how the 4th Infantry Division, under the command of then-Major General Ray Odierno, treated the civilian population of Salah ad-Din Governate in 2003. It is my understanding that the abuse of civilian non-combatants there met the definition of war crimes. He was subsequently promoted over better officers to 3 and then 4 stars, and the current Commander in Chief has not removed him, let alone charged him, for those apparent crimes.
The amorality of our military, and both Presidents, hurt me deeply.

But my US Army is better than a few bad apples at the top. This bad news is more than balanced by the good news. Many in that professional cadre care deeply about doing good. Many of them serve in the combat arms specifically to ensure conscience and accountability percolate down to the tip of the spear.
What's more, the junior enlisted and junior officers who are not careerists are overwhelmingly moral people who will refuse illegal orders and report violations of the Law of Land Warfare.

Part of the indoctrination in Basic Training, and at the service academies, is to condition soldiers to obey orders reflexively. But it turns out that American soldiers aren't so good at shedding their values and turning into monsters. If they were, there would be a lot less PTSD among combat vets.

If the Captains, Majors and Colonels, along with Platoon Sergeants, First Sergeants and Sergeants Major, saw Generals being held accountable for illegal or immoral acts, more of the careerist cadre would live out the values in our Declaration of Independence.
But even without leadership coming from the White House, there are plenty, more than a supermajority in the Army, who will not only do the right thing under pressure, but will demand that their leaders do, too.

the avid student opines
.

 
At 1:59 PM, Anonymous lidia said...

to the avid student

Thanks for your answer, but you got it wrong. I do NOT "question the capacity of the US Army to do good" USA army is an imperialist army and it could do "good" only to imperialism. I never said that all USA troops are criminals (not only because some of them got ill, but because others refuse to take part in war crimes). But the army as a body is a war crimes machine, pure and simple.

"The mission was to topple Saddam" - i.e. to commit a war crime - unprovoked war is a war crime (by Nuremberg judge -an American) It was enough to turn Iraqis against USA army in itself, and "then win hearts and minds" was a b...s..., the real "mission" was to grab oil, help Israel to bully the ME and do some unpleasant things to Russia, China and even EU.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home