60 Said Killed in NATO Bombing;
US Aid Monies May support Taliban Activities
Preliminary reports are saying that a NATO airstrike on an oil tanker earlier hijacked by guerrillas set off an enormous explosion as people had gathered around it. Some 60 are feared dead.
There has been a central and continuing debate about how the Taliban and other anti-government guerrilla groups in Afghanistan have been funded. Initially it was thought that they were involved in the drug trade, but it turns out that they probably don't manage to capture very much money from it (they are after all competing with corrupt government officials and criminal cartels). Then it was suggested that money is coming in from millionaire Muslim fundamentalists in the Gulf, from the United Arab Emirates & etc.
Now it turns out that we have met the enemy and he may well be us. Taliban are getting a cut of US government aid contracts in Afghanistan. Jean McKenzie of Global Post broke the story that the Taliban are getting a cut of US government aid contracts in Afghanistan. That story in turn prompted a congressional investigation that is generating more media on the question. The establishment of a substantial American press corps in Kabul and Islamabad is beginning to yield dividends for the US public in the form of investigative reporting that was infrequent earlier in the 2000s, in part because it is dangerous and in part because AfPak were not big emphases for the Bush administration.
CBS reports on the congressional hearings to find out if congress is authorizing money that goes to Taliban.
In turn, the State Department is now probing whether US Agency for International Development monies are making their way into guerrillas' hands.
End/ (Not Continued)

|
Facebook





3 Comments:
While the stupidity of U.S. politics and media will mean a domestic focus on the money, this is really an exposure of the underlying fallacy of the American and British war strategy in Afghanistan, i.e., the charade that the Taliban and war-lordism could be ultimately defeated through internationally-funded "nation building."
.
USAID appears to be rather dysfunctional and corrupt.
From the story you linked to on USAID money going to Taliban, I linked to several more stories about non-profit USAID implementing partners [they consider "contractor" to be a dirty word.]
Some of them charge 30% overhead for aid and development efforts. Some CEO's of these "non-profits" make more than stockbrokers.
Their "non-profit" status is questionable to me.
In Iraq, they inspect and evaluate their own work. Turns out that a $600 million jobs program that supposedly created 45,000 jobs may not have even created half that many. How does a job that pays $2,600 a year cost over $26,000 to create ?
How can the US Congress accuse Karzai of corruption, when their own agencies are getting away with this kind of monkey business ?
._._._.
The CBS News video report says that the Taliban skims 20% off the top of USAID road construction projects.
Well, most road construction projects in Afghanistan are actually done under contract to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
Is it the same, better or worse on Corps contracts ? Two were just awarded in the last 2 months for over $250 Million for roads in Paktika and Gido China.
,-,-,-,-,-,-,
How bad is it, if USAID money is getting into Taliban hands ?
How is this different than paying Sunnis in Anbar not to shoot at us ?
This is protection money to keep the construction contractors safe. Can't we do something so that it also pays to keep our soldiers safe ? Add a clause to the contract ?
.
Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri is still urging Pakistanis to support the "mujahideen," who he says stopped a Pakistani military attempt to capture key cities in Waziristan:
Al-Zawahiri: Pakistan Heading Down "Path of Doom"
Post a Comment
<< Home