Egyptian Crowds in Tahrir Insist the Revolution will Continue

Perhaps 100,000 Egyptians came out on Wednesday in Tahrir Square in Cairo to mark the anniversary of the first massive protest that led to the overthrow of dictator Hosni Mubarak. There was also a huge crowd in Alexandria, Egypt’s second city.

But the gathering was not simply a commemoration. The revolutionary youth used the occasion to put more pressure on the Egyptian military to step down and go back to the barracks, handing power to the elected parliament and its speaker.

The leftist youth are not concerned that the civilian parliament is heavily dominated by right wing religious deputies from the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafi Nur Party. They will take their chances with the fundamentalists. They believe that nothing can be accomplished in the new Egypt unless military rule is ended.

Aljazeera English reports:

The established parties, such as the Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party and the secular, middle class Wafd Party, were also present in Tahrir Square. (There are typically five or six stages around the square, and orators take turns addressing the crowds, which gravitate to the most interesting speaker).

Revolutionary youth are vowing to set up tents and stay in the square, in preparation for more rallies on Thursday and Friday. The Muslim Brotherhood, in contrast, went home Wednesday night.

Al-Ahram reports that newly elected parliamentarian on the Wafd ticket, Muhammad Abd al-Alim Da’ud, addressed the crowd, saying that the revolution should continue and that the protesters should keep a close eye on their elected representatives and pressure them, and if they betray the ideals of the revolution, they should be unseated.

Da’ud was describing an almost Jeffersonian ideal of democracy, wherein there are constant revolutions or pressure from revolutionaries. The youth revolutionaries are almost being depicted as a check on arbitrary power beyond the Madisonian checks and balances offered by the traditional three branches of government (executive, legislative, judiciary). In addition to those three, street revolutionaries, in this view, should also supply checks and balances.

Given continued military rule, street protests are probably the only way to push it back. Despite gloom in the ranks of revolutionaries about how much continuity there is in Egypt from the Mubarak era, they have nevertheless had many victories this past 12 months, aside from deposing Mubarak. In July, a new round of demonstrations forced the military to put Mubarak on trial, along with other regime figures. And in anticipation of the big crowds of yesterday, the military finally did abolish the emergency decrees of 1981, which suspended key civil and human rights described in the Egyptian constitution. Although Field Marshal Muhammad Hussein Tantawi reserved the right to continue to treat harshly any “thugs,” in most cases civilians can now no longer be tried in military courts. This is a big victory.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Responses | Print |

4 Responses

  1. West supported Mubarak for thirty years.

    I wonder how much support the new General Tantawi has. How many billion Dollars carrot west has in front of him?

    In the Islamic world, especially in the Middle East democracy is just not in the best interest of the west.

  2. Only two comments on this moving subject? The moving finger, having written, moves on…

    Too bad there’s no analogue of “differential diagnosis” in geopolitics, where way too much of the thinking and posturing and pontificating seem most like how old Procrustes used to treat the people HE robbed. link to en.wikipedia.org

    “Jeffersonian democracy?” “Madisonian democracy?” Armed revolutionaries in the streets as a fourth perpetual branch of the Model of Government according to Western lights? None of the above models, forms, “ideals?”

    One might hope that something might happen here, other than laying down the “frames” into which various persuaders want to force what’s happening, which might be something else altogether than what’s allowed in the preconceived comfort food and shibboleths of one band or another, by hacking off any bits that stick out, or stretching things to fit (or stuffing conveniently shaped preconceptions into any gaps at the corners and edges, and doing a little or a lot of policy-wonk Photoshopping on the rest to make it “fit the model.”)

    Maybe what’s happening out of Tahrir Square is an aspirational revulsion for being forced onto a dead-end path to militarized parasitic kleptocracy, and a demand for what might be called “normalcy.” I don’t know, I’m sure, but the Pundits of Predestination sure as hell don’t know. And it’s too bad they are on stage as “opinion leaders,” when what’s needed is a little more clarity and honesty and a lot more transparency. Some large majority of nearly 7 billion humans pretty much wants to just live and let live, get along, make a decent life. as long as their tribal buttons aren’t covertly pushed and their demands are not manufactured into intolerable and unsustainable “wantsandgottahaves.” How you rein in the cancerous minority, I don’t know — maybe ask an Egyptian, or a “Syrian dissident,” or an Occupier?

    It’s a living process, “normalcy,” but it needs a spiritual-DNA framework if it’s going to grow with any vigor and direction. Especially given the load of toxins that’s already in the body, and those guys who are always ready to rack or amputate anyone who doesn’t “fit.”

Comments are closed.