Informed Comment Homepage

Thoughts on the Middle East, History and Religion

Header Right

Donate

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Email
  • RSS
  • Featured
  • US politics
  • Middle East
  • Environment
  • US Foreign Policy
  • Energy
  • Economy
  • Politics
  • About
  • Archives
  • Submissions

© 2023 Informed Comment

  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Uncategorized

Militias Forbidden And Us Hypocrisy

Juan Cole 04/08/2004

Tweet
Share
Reddit
Email
0 Shares

Militias Forbidden? And US Hypocrisy

Coalition Provisional Authority spokesman Dan Senor, who has often attempted to peddle frankly false stories, was at it again on Wednesday. He said Muqtada al-Sadr was targeted because he maintained a militia.

Let’s see: In April of 2003, the US Department of Defense flew Ahmad Chalabi into Iraq with over a thousand of his militiamen, actually transporting them in US troop carriers. They brought a militia to Iraq.

The US had also made a political alliance with the Suprime Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, based in Tehran 1982-2003, the Badr Corps militia of which came back to Iraq from Iran, where it had been trained by the hardline Revolutionary Guards. Some 10,000 – 15,000 militiamen came back to Iraq. The US did make token efforts to disarm the Badr Corps, then gave up on the enterprise. The CPA appointed the leader of the Badr Corps to the Interim Governing Council.

The Shiite al-Da`wa Party has a paramilitary militia. It is a close ally of the US, and Ibrahim Jaafari, its leader, was appointed to the Interim Governing Council. The Iraqi Hizbullah leader Abdul Karim al-Muhammadawi has a militia of marsh Arabs, and he was appointed to the Interim Governing Council.

One might conclude that the US approved of private militias. It flew Chalabi’s into the country. It allied with SCIRI despite the latter’s militia. It appointed Da`wa leaders to the Interim Governing Council despite that organization’s militias. The Coalition have actively depended on Shiite militias to provide security to cities like Samawah and even parts of Basra.

So the message appears to be that you can have a large militia, but if you say you approve of the US and cooperate with it, you are not bothered and are even promoted onto the Interim Governing Council. Only if you have a militia but ask the US to withdraw from Iraq does your militia suddenly become illegal. Some Iraqis might conclude that the illegal act is criticizing the Americans, not maintaining a militia.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About the Author

Juan Cole is the founder and chief editor of Informed Comment. He is Richard P. Mitchell Professor of History at the University of Michigan He is author of, among many other books, Muhammad: Prophet of Peace amid the Clash of Empires and The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam. Follow him on Twitter at @jricole or the Informed Comment Facebook Page

Primary Sidebar

STAY INFORMED

Join our newsletter and have sharp analysis delivered to your inbox every day.

Twitter

Follow Juan Cole @jricole or Informed Comment @infcomment on Twitter

Facebook



Sign up for our newsletter

Informed Comment © 2023 All Rights Reserved

Posting....