Informed Comment Homepage

Thoughts on the Middle East, History and Religion

Header Right

Donate

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Email
  • RSS
  • Featured
  • US politics
  • Middle East
  • Environment
  • US Foreign Policy
  • Energy
  • Economy
  • Politics
  • About
  • Archives
  • Submissions

© 2023 Informed Comment

  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Uncategorized

Beirut Bombing Kills Communist

Juan Cole 06/21/2005

Tweet
Share
Reddit
Email
0 Shares

Beirut Bombing Kills Communist Opposition Leader

The victory in Sunday’s polling of the anti-Syrian faction in Lebanese politics has not led to social peace. The coalition of Saad Hariri won in the north in part by having Sunni clerics mount their pulpits in mosques and play on sectarian feelings to defeat Maronite General Michele Aoun’s supporters and other pro-Syrian figures. Ironically, the Syrians originally gerrymandered the north in 2000 so as to give an advantage to the Sunnis over the Christians. In this election, Hariri’s Sunni supporters were anti-Syrian and many of the Christian candidates were pro-Syrian.

Among the primary demands of the victorious parties is the removal of pro-Syrian President Emile Lahoud. This aim will be difficult to accomplish, since the opposition has a small majority in parliament and it is not even clear how a president, as opposed to a prime minister, could be removed.

The first major event of the new regime was the assassination of Georges Hawi, a former secretary-general of the Communist Party of Lebanon, who had thrown in with the anti-Syrian opposition. His is the fourth high-profile assassination by bombing in the past year. Many Lebanese believe that Syrian intelligence and/or pro-Syrian President Emile Lahoud is behind the assassinations. Gen. Aoun, despite having earlier fought Syria, has defended Lahoud from such charges, saying that they are unfounded. Aoun has about 20 seats for his list in parliament.

The US analysts who called the anti-Syrian movement of last spring, in the wake of the assassination of former prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri, a “Cedar Revolution” or an “Arab Spring” profoundly misread the situation. While it is true that the Syrians had outworn their welcome for most Lebanese, and could be induced to withdraw their troops, Lebanon remains deeply divided, unlike post-election Ukraine, e.g. The Shiite parties, Hizbullah and Amal, support President Lahoud, as does Aoun and his list. Minority factions among the Sunnis and Druze do, as well. But most Sunnis turned against Syria with Hariri’s assassination, and the majority of Druze follow Waleed Jumblatt, who has also come out against Lahoud.

The question is therefore whether a drive to remove the president on the part of Hariri and his allies will so polarize Lebanon as to bring back the social violence of the Civil War years. Hawi’s killing on Tuesday is not a promising omen in that regard.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About the Author

Juan Cole is the founder and chief editor of Informed Comment. He is Richard P. Mitchell Professor of History at the University of Michigan He is author of, among many other books, Muhammad: Prophet of Peace amid the Clash of Empires and The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam. Follow him on Twitter at @jricole or the Informed Comment Facebook Page

Primary Sidebar

STAY INFORMED

Join our newsletter and have sharp analysis delivered to your inbox every day.

Twitter

Follow Juan Cole @jricole or Informed Comment @infcomment on Twitter

Facebook



Sign up for our newsletter

Informed Comment © 2023 All Rights Reserved

Posting....