Will the US side with Saudi or Qatar in the Great Gulf Civil War?

(By Omar Ali)

The Saudi
strategy of offering military support to the US while exporting Muslim
militancy and portraying itself as the protector of the two holiest sites in
the Islamic world has backfired for both Saudi Arabia and the US. 

are increasing in the Persian Gulf, with Qatar on one side, and Saudi Arabia,
Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) on the other. On March 5, the three
states recalled their ambassadors from Qatar, demanding that it honour a
previous agreement to end its support for the Muslim Brotherhood and
interference in their internal affairs.

Arabia might also impose blockades and sanctions, and close off its airspace to
Qatari planes. It has further demanded that Qatar shut down Al Jazeera and two prominent research
centres in Doha. The disagreement comes in the wake of other serious crises in
the GCC that have the potential to significantly realign geo-strategic alliances
within the region.

Saudi Arabia and the future of GCC

is a growing rift within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), not only between
Qatar and Saudi Arabia, but also between Saudi Arabia and the countries of
Kuwait and Oman. The disagreement with Oman surfaced last November when it
disagreed with Saudi Arabia over creating a union out of the GCC alliance.
Oman’s stance on the issue was a clear message that it regards the formation of
a union as a threat to its sovereignty. Also, leading up to the Geneva
agreement, since 2011, Oman has played host to secret negotiations between the
US and Iran. Saudi Arabia’s animosity towards Iran is no secret, so, from its
perspective, Oman – by declining to form a union with Saudi Arabia, keeping
warm relations with Iran and playing an active part in its rehabilitation – is
not only thwarting Saudi Arabia’s desire for regional hegemony but also
presenting it with a security risk.

regards to Kuwait, Saudi Arabia has had to contend with some serious opposition
mounted by its parliamentarians and civil society groups against a security
pact that it wants approved. The pact will unite the member states against any
external threat and allow for better coordination over issues of internal

non-ratification of the pact not only keeps Saudi Arabia from using the GCC to
manage regional dissent, but also resonates with Qatar. One Kuwaiti concern is
that the agreement requires member states to extradite their citizens upon the
request of other member states. This aspect of the agreement has direct bearing
on the dispute between Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia accuses the Qatari
government of meddling in its internal security affairs and giving refuge to
members of the Muslim Brotherhood – officially regarded as terrorists by Saudi

Saudi Arabia and Qatar: a history of disputation

between Qatar and Saudi Arabia must, therefore, be seen alongside other
regional disagreements. What must also be remembered, is the long history of
disputes between these neighbours. In 1913, Saudi King Abdul Aziz decided to
annex Qatar, and it was only two years later, under British pressure, that the
Saudi state recognized Qatar’s borders. Recent comments by Prince Bandar bin
Sultan, the head of the Saudi intelligence agency, display that Saudi disregard
for Qatar’s sovereignty is still active. According to him, Qatar is ‘nothing
but 300 people and a TV channel’. In 1992 Saudi Arabia sent its forces into
Qatar, and a few years later, in 1995, the Qatari government alleged that Saudi
Arabia was fomenting a coup in Qatar.

in turn, apparently harbours plans to split Saudi Arabia. In a leaked phone
conversation, from January 2011, Qatar’s then prime minister, Hammad bin
Jassim, claimed that Saudi Arabia could unravel at his hands, and that after
its king’s death, it would be partitioned and Qatar will seize the Qatif

Qatar between three poles of power

with the existence of the GCC under threat, and Saudi Arabia bullying Qatar
with its ultimatums, the Persian Gulf is likely to see a significant shift in
alliances. Since the region has three principal power poles; Iran, Saudi Arabia
and the US, the fallout between Saudi Arabia and Qatar will not only force
Qatar to find further reasons to side with Iran, but it could also encourage
the US to favour Qatar over Saudi Arabia, as a more stable military partner.

recent disagreement with Iran over Syria notwithstanding, the countries have
maintained good diplomatic relations, leading to the recent idea of developing
a free zone. They already share the world’s largest gas field, the South
Pars/North Dome gas field. Qatar has also kept its Shia population
significantly happier than Saudi Arabia. While not partners in the highest
echelons of power, Qatari Shias are sufficiently integrated, economically and
culturally, to not view their Qatari identity as a misfortune.

removes the thorny issue of sectarian differences that might have deterred them
from becoming friendlier. Also, Iran has been keen on finding a way of
dissociating Muslim Brotherhood type of Islamic republicanism from the
anti-Shia brand of Wahhabi Islam that Saudi Arabia promotes, and in Qatar it is
likely to find an able partner in achieving this end.

for Qatar-US relations, with US-Saudi ties likely to witness a downturn due to
future shale gas production in the US, and Qatar housing the US Central Command
at its al-Udeid Air Base, Qatar will grow in importance to the US as a regional

… as a US ally is already suffering and is complicated by its own policies.
The Saudi strategy of offering military support to the US while exporting
Muslim militancy and portraying itself as the protector of the two holiest
sites in the Islamic world has backfired for both Saudi Arabia and the US. For
the US, it led to the 9/11 catastrophe and the expensive wars thereafter, while
for Saudi Arabia, it gave rise to massive security threats, both internally and

on the other hand, with its smaller size/population and no pretensions to
religious leadership, represents a safer bet. Qatar has also managed Muslim
Brotherhood’s republicanism much better than Saudi Arabia. By supporting it in
Egypt, Libya and Tunisia (instead of treating it as a threat), not only has Qatar
minimized the chances of a republican critique of its own monarchical Islam,
but it has also made itself an indispensable supporter of Islamic populism.

the Muslim Brotherhood is in power or out of power, it knows that it can count
on Qatari support, and this goes a long way toward constructing a
people-friendly image for the Qatari regime. This is not to suggest that the US
will necessarily make a choice between Qatar and Saudi Arabia. However, in a
context where Saudi Arabia is increasingly indicating that it will take a path
independent of the US, the lattter might see Qatar as a more reliable ally.


deterioration in Saudi-Qatari relations threatens the viability of the GCC and
implies a realignment of alliances in the Persian Gulf. Saudi Arabia is giving
reasons to Qatar for siding with the Iranian and US poles of power in the
region, without presenting itself as a committed or useful ally to the US. This
will decrease its regional dominance by a significant measure. Can Saudi Arabia
reverse this trend? Most observers of the region wait with bated breath to see
its next course of action.

About the author

Omar Ali is a
researcher at the Afro-Middle East Centre in Johannesburg, South Africa. He
specializes in Middle Eastern politics, with a specific focus on the Gulf
Cooperative Council.

Mirrored from Open Democracy

Related video:

RT: S Arabia, UAE, Bahrain withdraw envoys from Qatar

3 Responses

  1. Tiny Qatar has three assets that worry Saudi Arabia. The first one is that it has huge wealth for its tiny population and does not need to rely on Saudi Arabia. The second and a more important asset is that it houses America’s main military base in the Persian Gulf region, thus it is indispensable to US military in the way that Saudi Arabia no longer is. Its third and the most important asset is what Bandar Bin Sultan contemptuously referred to as a TV channel. Al Jazeera television network, the first relatively free and independent television network in the whole Arab world, has emerged as a major vehicle for change in the region, exposing the weaknesses of many Arab regimes. It is a channel that is watched widely and mainly trusted by young Arab populations and it has opened a window to the outside world for those conservative societies. It can be argued that “Arab Spring” owed more to Al Jazeera than to any other factor.

    Despite disagreements with Iran over Syria, Qatar has kept a line of communication open with Iranian leaders and with its opposition to the Egyptian military junta it has also established close relations with Turkey. So it has regional backers much more populous and much more important than Saudi Arabia. For all those reasons, Saudi Arabia is bound to lose out in its fight against Qatar, and the US would do well to side with Qatar to reduce religious extremism emanating from Saudi Arabia and forcing some real change in that medieval kingdom.

  2. “Qatar is ruled by an emir who has been very adept at using Islamists, especially the Muslim Brotherhood, to promote his country’s interests and bolster his own domestic legitimacy. The success of this policy has materialised in the coming to power of Islamists in Tunisia and Egypt [for a period of time], and in Qatar’s ability to turn the Palestinian Islamist organisation Hamas away from Syria and Iran. The influence of Islamism within Qatari society and politics has been very limited, however, which highlights the pragmatic and instrumental use of this ideology and movement by the regime in Doha in the pursuit of regime survival.” “[I]t is certain that some members of the royal family are Islamist in orientation and deeply religious….[H]owever, these members of the family have been sidelined politically and are not allowed to manage the relationship with the Islamists. This illustrates the general observation that Qatar is ruled by non-ideologically driven policies, i.e. by pragmatic ones. This underscores that Qatar might one day abandon the Islamists and Islamism if the cost of patronising them become too burdensome.”
    link to detailedpoliticalquizzes.wordpress.com

Comments are closed.