Iraq: Are Sunni Arabs of Kirkuk Province Turning on ISIL?

Ahmad Mohammed | Kirkuk | via Niqash.org

Sunni Muslim extremists continue to kidnap, execute and otherwise impose their authoritarian rule on locals in the areas they control, such as in southwestern Kirkuk. Slowly but surely though, local resistance against them is growing. Tribal leaders suggest an organized, salaried force is in development.

On the 12th day after the Sunni Muslim extremist group known as the Islamic State, or IS, took control of southwestern parts of the province of Kirkuk, some of their fighters paid a visit to the house of a local tribal leader.

IS group fighters looted and destroyed the home of Sheikh Anwar al-Assi in the village of Arumel, south west of Kirkuk city. They did so because the sheikh had refused to swear allegiance to them.

 The attack came despite the fact that al-Assi heads the Abid tribe in the area and that this tribe is one of the major Arab tribes here, and also has members in other parts of Iraq.

Al-Assi then left his village and went to Sulaymaniyah, inside the semi-autonomous region of Iraqi Kurdistan, which is controlled by the Iraqi Kurdish military – he had word that next the IS group planned to kill him.

“The IS group kidnaps and executes anyone who doesn’t cooperate with them as well as those they have doubts about,” al-Assi told NIQASH. “Those who don’t swear allegiance are accused of working for the government or of trying to form militias to fight against them – all grounds for execution, in the IS group’s opinion.”

“Lately fighters from the IS group have been kidnapping a lot of local people,” al-Assi says, adding that the fighters are becoming more and more violent and unjust. “Not even women have been spared. Fighters kidnapped four women from their homes in the Hawija district recently.”

This kind of behaviour is starting to get stronger reactions from local people. Currently the IS group control the centre of the Hawija district as well as five other Kirkuk neighbourhoods.

On June 31, IS fighters killed a woman in the Zab neighbourhood in Hawija because they said she had insulted the IS group. The woman was a housewife and had a son who used to serve in the Sunni Muslim militia known as the Awakening or Sahwa forces, that fought against Al Qaeda; her husband died in 2007.

“This kind of behaviour is creating resentment toward the IS group,” al-Assi explains. “even those who welcomed them at first are no longer happy with them. And there have been some incidents in Kirkuk that indicate how annoyed people are with the IS group.”

For example, on Sept. 4, one of the IS group’s distinctive black flags was set alight by an unknown person in an abandoned lot near Tal Ali village in western Kirkuk. After this a large number of IS fighters stormed the village and kidnapped 50 of the local men. Thankfully after two days, all of the men were released again.

And on Sept. 12, three tribal leaders from a clan that was part of the Abid tribe were killed by the IS group; they also kidnapped 20 people from within the Rashad district. The locals were kidnapped because the IS fighters said they were conspiring to form a militia to expel the IS group from their areas.

“Even individuals who were cooperating with the IS group when things began in June have started turning against them now,” Ahmed Askari, an Iraqi Kurdish member of Kirkuk’s provincial council and head of the security committee there, told NIQASH. “They have started contacting security forces in Kirkuk to inform on them and tell them where the IS group are located.”

Many locals are also fleeing the hell that is IS,” Askari added.

A source inside Kirkuk’s military says that they also have information from locals who feel they were manipulated by the IS group but who have now realized that IS fighters are committing violent acts and behaving badly. Many of these locals have also fled their homes.

There is also communication between the central government in Baghdad and the heads of tribes in Kirkuk about the formation of a properly organized armed force to fight the IS group in Kirkuk.

Al-Assi confirmed this, adding that the decision to form such a force is now pending government approval. But, he said, the approval should be sped up. “The delay in liberating these areas from the IS group is a continuous source of misery for the people who have to live under them, live with their mercy, their policies and their mistreatment,” al-Assi said.

Al-Assi outlines the plans for the formation of organised troops. The training, payment, arming and administration of any such force would be the responsibility of Baghdad. The tribes’ role will be to supply the troops with “trusted and honest” forces and to help them avoid infiltration by “armed groups or individuals acting in bad faith”.

Despite all of this though there have not apparently been any real, organized efforts against the IS group in Hawija yet. People are upset with them, says one local inside Hawija contacted by NIQASH, who could not be named for security reasons, but up until now, most acts of resistance have been limited and individual.

“There are rumours about tribal leaders setting up forces to fight the IS group but there is no organized resistance yet,” the local said.

Most organized resistance by locals against the IS group seems to be happening in the Ninawa province at the moment, where the IS stronghold, the city of Mosul, is also located.

Mirrored from Niqash.org

——

Related video added by Juan Cole:

A Sunni Tribe that fights ISIS

8 Responses

  1. Other than the nominal religious identity of the dudes of IS, and the advantages of telecommunications and really potent weapons like AKs, how are these creatures and their ascendancy any different in the effects on ordinary people than prior Hordes and occupiers? As in the “conquest of the Incas” or in the US proper, the treatment of a Native Americans or blacks in Jim Crow South? As just a couple of random examples from a very long catalog of human interactions?

    For the sake of ordinary people in Iraq and Syria, we can hope that this batch of violent opportunists gets disassociated soon. But it’s hardly a unique phenom. It is interesting that the abusive and repressive Gulf State feudalists who helped birth and feed the beast are now crying “existential threat to their own intended abuses… Reality sometimes trumps Narrative, when the dissonance gets too cognitive, despite the best efforts of Power.

  2. ISIS are not Sunni extremists. They are Wahhabi extremists, expressly anti-Sunni.

    • This is simply not true. They say they are Salafi Sunnis and the Wahhabi clergy reject them altogether.

        • Um, ok, I guess I thought “Wahhabi” was a derogatory term for Salafis, but otherwise these were mostly interchangeable terms. Looks like I was wrong.

        • Generally addressing everyone:
          Sunni radicals, fundamentalists, extremists, Islamist, militants, jihadists, descriptions do fit. Brainwashed sub-sect or not, they unfortunately do arise from certain Sunni groups. Most of ISIL identify as Salafists (some Sunni rebels who defected to them weren’t originally Salafi). Even among Salafists there are different opposing views (Jihadist, non-Jihadist) condemning ISIL, not just pro-Saud Wahhabis. Aside the brutality, had ISIL not proclaimed caliphate, condemners would’ve been less, including some regular Sunni rebel supporters.

          ISIL aren’t anti-Sunni. Only scorn against non-practising or ‘bad’ Sunnis according to their interpretation or takfir against other Sunni sub-sect groups like Sufis, accused as grave worshippers, etc (like anti-Shia views and other non-Sunni attacks). They identify with Sunnis there on sect background, no matter their hi-jack of Sunnism, which they come under.

          Most Salafi puritanical beliefs, with few exceptions, are shared by Wahhabis. The Wahhabis (or Saudis) promoted their ideology and militancy globally decades ago which had some Salafi influence. The Wahhabi label was common than Salafi then. Now some previously identified Wahhabis distance themselves from that label (even adopting Salafi), which became derogatory. It irks Salafists and even Sunnis (pro or anti Wahhabi) who’re accused of extreme views.

          These movements’ origins and history are complicated but quite alike despite some differences. Personally, I use them interchangeably (along with other local variations like in Pakistan, such as Deoband or Ahl-e-hadith, etc), despite their protests. There are enough ideological commonalities and it’d be like splitting hairs to describe the ideological militancies.

Comments are closed.