Police Accountability more important than Bodycams

By Maria McFarland Sánchez-Moreno, Human Rights Watch

Yesterday’s grand jury decision in the Eric Garner case in New York City – the second in just over two weeks in which a grand jury in the United States failed to indict a white police officer in the killing of an unarmed African American – has raised important questions about one of the few concrete solutions that US officials (President Barack Obama and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, among them) have proposed for dealing with police brutality: the increased use of body cameras.

In theory, and with adequate protections in place for privacy rights, body cameras could provide a useful check on police abuse, though their effectiveness will depend on whether they operate independently of the officer wearing them.

But US and local officials should not treat them as a one-size-fits-all solution to police brutality. After all, Garner’s death in July – which the New York Medical Examiner ruled a homicide – was caught on video by a bystander. Given the prevalence of cell phones, police officers should assume that anything they do in public is likely to be caught on video, and if that was the case for the officer in the Garner case, it did not deter him from using an apparent chokehold, a tactic forbidden by the New York Police Department.

As with the Michael Brown case, it’s hard to assess the content of the Garner grand jury decision without more information. But it's understandable that many view the verdict as one more example of racial discrimination in the criminal justice system, and that the news set off a wave of (peaceful) protests throughout the city. Political leaders should take note. The protests are not just about these two cases: they’re about a criminal justice system in which police killings of people – and, the limited available data suggests, particularly young black men – are all too frequent and hardly ever prosecuted or sanctioned; a system that many African Americans feel, often with good reason, disproportionately targets them for arrest and prosecution.

President Obama has announced a task force to look at policing, though it’s not obvious that it will be looking at the deeper issues the protesters are raising. And Attorney General Eric Holder plans soon to issue an updated guidance to curb racial profiling in federal law enforcement, which – assuming it makes certain key improvements, and doesn’t include new loopholes – should help to address certain federal law enforcement abuses.

But until federal, state, and local governments all deal squarely with the larger problem of a criminal justice system warped by pervasive racial discrimination and impunity for police abuse – by, among other things, improving data collection on police brutality; reviewing and, where necessary, overhauling accountability mechanisms in cases involving police; and reforming police practices that result in abuse or that disproportionately burden African American communities – many of the speeches and proposals policymakers are making will ring hollow.

Mirrored from Human Rights Watch

—–

Related video added by Juan Cole:

CNN: “How effective are police body cameras?”

4 Responses

  1. No one bothers to vote for district attorneys and judges but people psychotic about crushing “those criminals”. The police work for the district attorneys, who along with those judges will protect policemen who go too far.

    There’s the mechanism of our problem. Do something about racist voters, or the media that trains them to believe that crime is much worse now than back in the “good old days” of the KKK, lynch mobs and police torture. Do something about the very institution of the district attorney. For God’s sake, do something about elected psychopath judges.

  2. Bodycams are a good way to see what happened from the wearer’s point of view. However, there also has to be accountability – if the bodycam shows the officer acted improperly, and the officer is not held accountable for what the bodycam recorded, they’re of little use.

    On a side note, if the officer turns off the bodycam just before the instance of claimed wrongdoing, the presumption should be that the officer is guilty.

  3. For insight into the problem of violence and lack of respect for individual rights characteristic of much of American policing, along with a chronicle of how the 4th amendment protections have been erased in practice, read Radley Balko’s “The Rise of the Warrior Cop”. Not something recent, the problems have been growing since Nixon was in office calling for “law and order” and have exploded with the “war on drugs”.

Comments are closed.