Iran calls for Nuclear Disarmament by US, Israel, World

By Juan Cole | (Informed Comment) | —

At a summit on Monday, Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif turned the tables on the countries demanding that Iran keep its nuclear program for solely civilian, electricity generation. Zarif called for all countries to give up nuclear weapons, including Israel and the US. Iran does not have a nuclear bomb and gives no signs of trying to develop one.

The speech is a welcome reminder of how topsy-turvy Washington discourse on Iran is. Iran is viewed suspiciously as going for broke to get an atomic bomb, when there is no evidence for an Iranian nuclear weapons program. That the US has a massive nuclear arsenal is not mentioned. That the only nuclear-armed country in the Middle East is Israel is not mentioned. That George W. Bush was alarmed that an Israeli PM brandished the threat of a nuclear strike against Iraq is not mentioned. That Israel is not inspected by the International Atomic Energy Agency but Iran is, is not mentioned. That Western countries have actively connived to give Israel a nuclear weapons capability and to improve it is not mentioned. So US politicians constantly warn that if Iran gets a bomb it will kick of a nuclear arms race in the region, ignoring the fact that Israel has a bomb, which has already driven such a race (it was why Iraq in the 1980s sought bomb-making capabilities).

Zarif spoke on behalf of the Group of the Non-Aligned States Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons at the 2015 NPT Review Conference in New York, saying that the NPT is the essential framework for the whole world and that a complete disarmament should be the end game. He said,

“The nuclear-weapon-States have not made progress in eliminating their nuclear weapons. The role of nuclear weapons in security policies of the nuclear-weapon-States has not diminished. Some nuclear weapons States are modernizing their nuclear arsenals and planning research on new nuclear warheads, others have announced their intention to develop new delivery vehicles for nuclear weapons.”

Zarif went on to point to the power imbalance between the nuclear states and the non-nuclear states, and the failure of the former to provide credible security guarantees to the latter:

“The non-nuclear-weapons States Parties have not yet received unequivocal and legally binding security assurances. The transfer of nuclear technology continues to face impediments inconsistent with the Treaty, and no progress has been made to achieve universal adherence to the Treaty in the Middle East; to give but a few examples of the lack of implementation of the 1995, 2000 and 2010 agreements.”

Cole: It should be noted that the 2003 US invasion of Iraq was the invasion by a secure, nuclear-armed state of a poor, weak insecure non-nuclear state. What better incentive could there be for poor weak states to try to get a bomb as soon as possible?

Zarif went on to complain about violations of the spirit of the NPT by the nuclear-armed states:

” The improvement of existing nuclear weapons and the development of new types of nuclear weapons violate the commitments undertaken by the nuclear-weapon States at the time of the conclusion of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty… We call upon the nuclear-weapon States to immediately cease their plans to further invest in modernizing and extending the life span of their nuclear weapons and related facilities.”

He also complained about nuclear-armed states threatening to use their atomic bombs on others:

“We firmly believe that any use or threat of use of nuclear weapons would be a crime against humanity and a violation of the principles of the Charter of the United Nations and international law, in particular international humanitarian law. In this regard, we strongly call for the complete exclusion of the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons from military doctrines.”

As for the peaceful use of nuclear energy, Zarif added:

“We underline the right of all States parties to participate in the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. We strongly reject, and call for the immediate removal of, any restrictions or limitations posed on the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, including restrictions on exports to other States parties of nuclear material, equipment and technology for peaceful purposes.”

Zarif conveyed the Non-Aligned Movement’s unease with Israel being the only nuclear-armed country in the Middle East and with continued Western technology transfers to that country’s nuclear weapons programs:

“The Heads of State or Government of the Non-Aligned Movement, in their Tehran Summit Declaration of 2012, reiterated their support for the establishment of a zone free of nuclear weapons and all other weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East and as a priority step to this end, reaffirmed the need for the speedy establishment of a NWFZ in the Middle East. They also called upon all parties concerned to take urgent and practical steps for the establishment of such a zone and, pending its establishment, demanded that Israel, the only one in the region that has neither joined the NPT nor declared its intention to do so, to renounce possession of nuclear weapons, to accede to the NPT without precondition and further delay, to place promptly all its nuclear facilities under IAEA full-scope safeguards and to conduct its nuclear related activities in conformity with the non-proliferation regime. They expressed great concern over the acquisition of nuclear capability by Israel which poses a serious and continuing threat to the security of neighboring and other States, and condemned Israel for continuing to develop and stockpile nuclear arsenals. They also called for the total and complete prohibition of the transfer of all nuclear-related equipment, information, material and facilities, resources or devices and the extension of assistance in the nuclear related scientific or technological fields to Israel.”

The Non-Aligned Movement is right that the Middle East needs to be a nuclear weapons-free zone. It is too unstable a region to stockpile atomic bombs there!


Related video added by Juan Cole:

CCTV News: ” Iranian nuclear chief hopeful of deal with West”

9 Responses

  1. What Mr. Zarif is suggesting is a no brainier, but then we must consider the world we are living in. All the countries of the world possessing nukes should escalate down to zero. After that, how about these same countries help the refugees gain food and shelter? People should take precedence over corporations.

  2. I spent most of my working life in the Mid-East and North Africa: Jordan/Palestine (love that country), Libya under Qadaffi (no comment) and Saudi Arabia (ditto). I agree with Zarif. Nobody in the Mid-East wants nuclear weapons as the indiscrimate slaughter of civilians is contrary to the teachings of the Holy Quran.

  3. I’m not sure what to make of your suggestion that having a few nukes would protect a country agaisnt the USA.

    What country would commit nuclear escalation with the USA in order to avoid a (mere) “conventional” war (even a “conventional” obliteration)?

    • The idea is if you are a country with a few nuclear weapons, then the U.S. will not dare to do a “shock ‘n’ awe,” on somebody lest the country might retaliate with a nuke. The theory of nukes is that they are deterrents. The notion is that “mutual assured destruction” will prevent an attack, because a counterattack would be mutual destruction. So far it has seemingly worked for N. Korea.

    • pabelmont, you may be right that in reality even a nuclear country attacked by USA wouldn’t use their nukes, but there is no way the US government can be sure about that in advance. They will have to take the loss of several cities into account as price for the war, and that makes it a lot less attractive.

      Assuming USA already have boots on the ground in the hostile country, a nuclear retaliation without killing their own soldiers might be difficult too.

  4. The flaw in Foreign Minister Zarif’s comments is that he has overlooked the fact that the United States and Israel are exceptional and have the right to be hypocrites. That right is ordained in the case of the United States being the greatest military power because of its massive armaments and despite its leadership in its war department. Israel has its aforesaid right because its lobby owns the White House and Congress.

    • You got it dead right, bill. I am so thankful Mohammad Zaria spoke these words, even though the masses of the USA will never know about this.

  5. I couldn’t agree more with the commentators above, and the irony that New York Times and WP don’t consider that as worth commenting upon. In fact they don’t even publish the letters written regarding that issue. As far as the Iran and Saudi Arabia and Islam is concerned, they use Qur’an only as much as Jews use Torah and it’s teachings! All these kings make mockery of Islam and are trying to protect their kingdoms.

Comments are closed.