Iraqi Government halts al-Anbar Campaign over Sectarian Fears, US Pressure

By Juan Cole | (Informed Comment) | – –

The Kuwaiti press (al-Siyasah) is alleging that the Iraqi government, under American pressure, has hit the pause button on its campaign to take al-Anbar Province back from Daesh (ISIS, ISIL). The report was also carried by in the United Arab Emirates.

A source in the Iraqi government said that there were three reasons for the halt in the week-old campaign, all of them stemming in part from American pressure.

First, the Iraqi army and its Shiite militia auxiliaries have staged 60 attacks on Falluja and Ramadi during the past weeks and not once were they able to break through Daesh lines. The Americans suggested that better coordination be set up between US and coalition air strikes and the Iraqi forces so that the latter could take full advantage of the air strikes. Apparently this past week the US views the Iraqi attacks as having been indiscriminate.

Second, the Iraqi government had suspended recruitment of Sunni tribesmen to a training program run by US troops at Base Progress in Habbaniya. The US is convinced that this step was taken to play down the Sunni role in the campaign to retake al-Anbar and to strengthen that of the Shiite militias.

Third, the Shiite militias had massed some 20,000 fighters outside the strongly Sunni city of Falluja, raising fears in the American command that if such a force took a Sunni city like that, it would provoke severe sectarian tensions that would weaken the campaign against Daesh and might even lead to the break-up of the national unity government of Haydar al-Abadi, who at the moment has Sunni political allies.

Although the Iraqi government had announced the beginning of the campaign 7 days ago, when he was in Baghdad this weekend, Gen. Martin Dempsey said that in his opinion the beginning of the al-Anbar campaign was a ways off.

One Arabic newspaper maintained that during his visit Dempsey advised the Iraqi government to withdraw Iranian military advisers from the al-Anbar campaign. He is alleged to have urged PM al-Abadi to depend more instead on Sunni tribal levies.

The Shiite militiamen are said by this source to have taken extremely high casualties over the past week with nothing to show for it.

I read these leaks to suggest that, as with the Tikrit campaign, the initial planning and strategy has been carried out by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, and it has failed because the Sunnis in Falluja and Ramadi simply won’t accept what they see as an Iranian, Shiite conquest. Also as with Tikrit, the Iraqi government half way through has had abruptly to turn to the United States to re-plan the assault because of Iranian failures and because of the sectarian issue.

Reading between the lines, I suspect that this campaign had been mainly spearheaded by the Shiite militias and their Iranian advisers, and perhaps the US has been unwilling to give them close air support in a sustained manner, insisting on working with the formal Iraqi army. To get the US aerial bombardment it needs to take down Daesh, the Iraqi government is going to have to bring Sunni forces into play in a much bigger way, to make the American side happier.

Related video: Juan Cole:

PressTV: “Iraqi forces pound ISIL positions around Ramadi”

8 Responses

  1. When Daesh is gone, al Qaeda is gone, Assad is gone, Iran has focused on domestic things, and the US did its last airstrike, what’s next? It seems our goal is to have a level playing field for the Sunnis and Shiites to have fight to the finish, without outside interference.

    • What’s next?? When did it become less than obvious? A very determined, multi-lateral ‘encouragement’ of Israel to get out of the West Bank and to end the blockade of Gaza on the basis of the Saudi Plan. The Caliphate fellows haven’t changed that. They’ve just provided encouragement for the United States and Europe to get it done without further nonsense from the guys whose G-d once described them as ‘stiff-necked’.

      Another way to look at it is to similarly encourage Israel to give up its dreams of a de facto empire in the region based on the threat of the use of force. It’s unrealistic, unsustainable and grossly conflicts with American and European interests. It conflicts with the fact that we are now there involuntarily and would dearly love to get out.

      We can’t be certain of the result, but it is likely to diminish radical ardor. Even ISIL boys entertain thoughts of home and hearth, victory parades, etc. After all, the first cause of instability in the region was the Zionist-European intrusion back at the turn of the 20th Century. And the second cause was the American intrusion in support of it after WW II.

  2. Wonder how much shia backlash there is going to be if the US insists on keeping Daesh around until a Saudi-loyal Sunni militia group can be assembled? It hardly seems in their best interest.

  3. 60 attacks in a week, no break through and now a pause. Wonder why? The high temps in Baghdad for the next ten days will be between 115-120 degrees. HUMAN BEINGS can NOT fight a life and death battle in that kind of heat. Come to Vegas in August and go for a run in the midday sun. 10-15 minutes TOPS. This was probably a big bluff. 20,000 Shiites, lots of artillery, planes etc. and see if ISIS withdraws from Ramadi.

    This pause will last until mid-September.

  4. The Sunni kings and potentates will never put together any kind of effort…the are incapable….it’s a fight between Iran and Isis …with Syria and Lebanon on the line ..Iraq is gone..split forever…

  5. The question that journalists ask is when Anbar will be retaken. Which is natural, given the repugnance of ISIS. But given the deep divisions among ISIS’ foes, the more relevant question is when Baghdad will be invaded.

Comments are closed.