It is Israel that abrogated Oslo Peace Accords, as Netanyahu Boasted

By Juan Cole | (Informed Comment) | – –

Mahmoud Abbas, president of Palestine, renounced the Oslo Peace accords Wednesday, on the grounds that Israel itself has long since reneged on every key provision in that agreement. Abbas said,

“Thus, we declare that as long as Israel refuses to commit to the agreements signed with us, which render us an authority without real powers, and as long as Israel refuses to cease settlement activities and to release of the fourth group of Palestinian prisoners in accordance with our agreements, they leave us no choice but to insist that we will not remain the only ones committed to the implementation of these agreements, while Israel continuously violates them. We, therefore, declare that we cannot continue to be bound by these agreements and that Israel must assume all of its responsibilities as an occupying power, because the status quo cannot continue and the decisions of the Palestinian Central Council last March are specific and binding.”

Reuters: “Palestinians “cannot continue to be bound” by Oslo Accords: Abbas”

As one might expect, the American press reported in its headlines that Abbas was tearing up the accords (NYT), that he had hurt his reputation (Chicago Tribune), that it didn’t matter what he did (The Atlantic), that his complaints about the ethnic cleansing of and Apartheid imposed on Palestinians were unreasonable (The Atlantic), etc., etc. Most of these headlines and articles are frankly dishonest, and a form of pro-Israel propaganda.

In return for recognizing Israel and making peace, the Palestine Liberation Organization was promised by Israel in the Oslo Accords of 1993 and 1995 that Israel would withdraw from the occupied West Bank in three phases, ending by 1999, that it would cease sending in Israeli colonists to steal Palestinian land, that it would release Palestinian political prisoners, that it would allow a corridor for Gaza-West Bank connections, and so forth.

The agreement implied that the newly created Palestine Authority (which Palestinians now prefer to call simply Palestine) would police Palestinians for Israel. That expectation is the only thing in the agreements to which Israel is still committed, and Abbas is threatening to stop serving Israel in this way.

The PLO web site lays out the main ways in which Israel has reneged on its treaty commitments:

“1. Israel Has Failed to End its Occupation

2. Israel Continues to Build and Expand Its Illegal Colonies

(“It doubled the number of settlers living in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. There are now approximately 400,000 . . . Confiscated more than 60,000 acres of Palestinian land for colony construction and related by-pass roads, uprooted 220,000 trees and demolished 690 homes in the West Bank alone . . .”)

3. Israel Fails to Withdraw from Palestinian Territories (. . . The Palestinian Authority has only full jurisdiction over 17.2 percent of the West Bank.”)

4. Israel Fails to Release Political Prisoners

5. Israel Fails to Open the Northern Safe Passage Route between the Gaza Strip and the West Bank and Closes the Southern Safe Passage Route

6. Israel Fails to Co-operate on Security Matters

7. Israel Uses Lethal Force

8. Israel Denies Palestinians Freedom of Movement

9. Israel Fails to Prosecute Israeli Settlers for Crimes Committed Against Palestinians”

Whose fault is all this. Unambiguously, it is that of the Israeli government. Entirely. It met none of its obligations.

Current Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu, an extremist and supremacist, virulently opposed the accords at the time and has done everything he could to destroy them, because he wants to annex the West Bank to Israel and expel its millions of Palestinians or keep them in a chattel-like state of statelessness.

Netanyahu was caught on video boasting about how he had derailed the accords, already in 2001, and his tenure as prime minister has allowed him to finish the job.

“Netanyahu: I Deceived the US to Destroy Oslo Accords. English Subtitles”

When you destroy a peace treaty and derail a peace process, guess what you get instead?

Netanyahu made it clear he thinks Americans are suckers he can easily manipulate. He has on more than one occasion attempted to entangle us in wars for his benefit. When civil war breaks out in the West Bank, he expects us to bear the costs of it. Because we’re suckers.

Shares 0

9 Responses

  1. The Israeli response is going to be predictable: Netanyahu will shout “Yippee” and claim that if the Oslo Accords are toast then Israel has no responsibility for the 17% of the West Bank that contains 80% of the Palestinians.

    He’ll then impose a blockade on them and treat them like Gaza.

    He’ll shout “Why not? We don’t owe them anything”.

    And…. He’ll be wrong. If the Oslo Accords are dust then things return to the status-quo-ante, precisely because the IDF is still the occupying power and, therefore, responsible for all the West Bank and all the people in the West Bank.

    After all, int’l law doesn’t define them as “protected persons” merely because the good burgars of Geneva have a keen sense of humour.

    • The peace agreements and process died when Bibi took power. Technically, Israel has for decades imposed a blockade on the west bank because it also controls access to Jordan through River Jordan. West bank does not have its own international airport. The peace process was a charade which the Israel used to expand settlements as PA clamped its people. Now Israel will have to police them. I can see an intifada on the horizon.

  2. Abbas’ timing may prove fortuitous if it gives Netanyahu enough to think about to deter him from initiating another cull while Putin is at work next door on Daesh; something that may well have crossed his one track mind.

    • Brooding more over this during the last hours, it occurred to me that if, as seems quite possible, Russia and Iran do succeed in driving Daesh and other insurgents from Syria, they will come to exceed US influence in the ME, and the Palestinians will likely be collateral beneficiaries.

  3. Left unsaid by Abbas but obvious to independent observers is US complicity in Israel’s crimes against international law and Palestinian humanity.

    • Also left unsaid is the fact that only the American veto in the UNSC stands in the way of the French Resolution. Sanctions against Israel based on that Resolution can end our travail. It’s not in the least complex. Neither are the equities involved. What is wrong with us!? Why can’t we face the fact that we Americans, as is the case with the Israeli people, are responsible for these gross injustices perpetrated against the Palestinians?

      Mr. Obama, bite the bullet. Lead us out of this purgatory! We are not responsible for the crimes of Czars and Nazi tyrants against Jews.

  4. The Oslo accords never were a plan for a Palestinian state. Were Palestinians going to police Palestinian airspace? Would they have control over water resources in Palestinian territory? In fact, the Israeli negotiators of 1993 were quite clear that they were talking about a Palestinian Bantustan, not a state, even if they didn’t called it a Bantustan. Rabin called it a state minus.

    It is true that Mahmoud Abbas and his boss went along with the state-minus plan. Maybe they were resigned to the Apartheid One State, they simply hoped for a less brutal one.

  5. Abbas’s underlying message was economic pressure. The dog and pony show (peace process) has had its day in the sun, and he got a green light to close shop. The Oslo Accord acts as a subsidy for Israel’s occupation; by sub-contracting the PA with EU/US funding.

Comments are closed.