ISIL kills 70 in bombing of Shiite Area, Damascus, in bid to derail Talks

By Juan Cole | (Informed Comment) | – –

Daesh (ISIS, ISIL) claimed responsibility Sunday for bomb attacks in the Syrian capital of Damascus that seem likely to have aimed at derailing the tentative talks in Geneva.

First, a Daesh agent set off a car bomb next to a bus transporting Shiite fighters for the regime of Bashar al-Assad, killing 25. Then, when people gathered to give medical and other help, two assailants set off their belt bombs, killing more dozens.

Some 60 persons were injured in the bombings, some critically.

Lady_zaynab_mosque

Syria has many ethnic groups and sects. Some 10% to 14% are Alawite Shiites, the group from which the upper echelons of the regime and the officer corps are drawn. There are also other sorts of Shiite or offshoots of Shiism, including Twelvers (the kind that predominates in Iran and Iraq), Druze and Ismailis. Add them all up and they come to as many as 18% of the population.

Shiites give special honor to the family of the Prophet Muhammad, and they often erect shrines over their tombs. Zaynab bint Ali (d. 681) was the granddaughter of the Prophet Muhammad. Her shrine is in a district of Damascus, and the neighborhoods around it are heavily Shiite. In the past decade the area, known colloquially as Sitt Zaynab, has attracted expatriate Shiite communities such as refugees from the Iraq War and Lebanese Shiites. Most of those residents have had to leave because of Syria’s civil war and because the hard line Salafi Jihadis (who are hyper-Sunni and typically despise Shiites) have targeted the neighborhood, as they did again yesterday. But some expatriate remain, including fighters of the Hizbullah party-militia of Lebanon and volunteers from south Iraq. It was the latter that Daesh was targeting.

Likely the bombings were intended to throw a wrench into the negotiations that opened Monday in Geneva between the rebels and the Syrian regime, by heightening sectarian passions.

The talks were in trouble for other reasons. The Saudis sent Syrian members of the High Negotiations Commission to Geneva, but appointed as their spokesman Muhammad Alloush, leader of the hard line Salafi Army of Islam (Jaysh al-Islam), which attacks the idea of democracy.

The Bashar al-Assad regime and its Russian backers see the Army of Islam as a terrorist group no different from Daesh or al-Qaeda, and refuse to negotiate with it.

UN special envoy Steffan de Mistura dealt with this problem by engaging in a kind of shuttle diplomacy, going to see the regime representatives, and then after a decent interval visiting the rebels.

The rebel side insisted that the regime fulfill its commitments and lift the siege on 45,000 residents of rebel-held areas. It is a war crime for Syria to starve civilian populations as part of the war effort. The rebels also have some civilians under siege, especially in Shiite areas.

—–

Related video:

Euronews: “Damascus blasts aimed at disrupting Syria peace talks – EU foreign policy chief”

Posted in Featured,Syria | 4 Responses | Print |

4 Responses

  1. I would suggest that the usual reason for military incidents by insurgents during talks is to make a show of bargaining strength, not to derail talks. If they wanted to derail talks they would simply not attend. Of course there are often factions less willing to talk, and such incidents raise the issue of the ability of their negotiators to implement any solution. But either way they are seen as stronger negotiators.

    Any talk during war is more bargain than discussion of principle, and its success depends upon the existence of mutually acceptable compromises. That may be difficult where the insurgency leaders lose power in peacetime. Also where the motives of the West are corrupt and contradictory. Neither really wants peace because their leaders have power only during conflict, but the US leaders must actually start and prolong wars to get re-elected, so they do represent the causes of war, but do not seek any solution.

  2. “The Bashar al-Assad regime and its Russian backers see the Army of Islam as a terrorist group no different from Daesh or al-Qaeda, and refuse to negotiate with it.”

    If one believes in human rights, then one needs to be deeply distressed by the likes of Army of Islam and Muhammad Alloush. It’s not about being a “regime” apologist or a Russian “backer,” just a simple acknowledgement that this group has committed pogroms.

    After nearly five years of strife in Syria and the forced population transfer of a quarter of the civilian population, negotiations with tangible objectives need to occur. However, if we refuse to acknowledge that these groups have committed war crimes, then there is little space to ameliorate the continued disintegration of Syria. Instead, we will continue to look the other way, when Saudi Arabia and Turkey funnel arms and financial support to these groups that commit pogroms.

  3. The Salafist do not need an excuse for blowing things up and destruction. From an old Buda statue in Afghanistan to ancient ruins of Iraq and Syria to the minority houses of worship throughout areas under their control nothing is left standing and a people wanting this for the future of their country or put their faith in political and social stewardship of their country by colonial west and cash and carry democracies will end up at the bottom of some sea or worst, in an European ghetto as a subhuman slave like Libyans, afghans .. and deservingly so.

Comments are closed.