The Final Breakup of Iraq? Barzani calls for Kurdistan Referendum

By Juan Cole | (Informed Comment) | – –

The president of the Kurdistan Regional Government, Masoud Barzani, has called for an immediate non-binding referendum in Iraqi Kurdistan over whether its people want to secede from Iraq and form an independent Kurdish state.

Serok__President_Barzani__2012_09_27_h11m14s15__VR

A delegation from the KRG visited Baghdad yesterday, as well, headed by Barzani’s son.

Rudaw satellite television reported, according to BBC Monitoring,

“1.0130 Iraqi PM Haydar al-Abadi tells Kurdistan Region delegation headed by PM Nechirvan Barzani that there is no enough funds to assist the region in financial crisis; Abadi does not approve referendum in Kurdistan Region on independency; Abadi has asked the delegation for assisting Iraqi government in the liberation process of Nineveh Governorate.”

So the Baghdad government immediately said no to this referendum. But it could not offer any funds to Iraqi Kurdistan (because of the collapse of oil prices), and pleaded for the help of the Peshmerga in liberating Mosul from Daesh. No wonder Barzani feels in a strong position a the moment!

In summer of 2014, after Daesh (ISIS, ISIL) took Mosul and detached northern and western Iraq from the rule of the Shiite-dominated government in Baghdad, Kurdistan Regional Government head Masoud Barzani called for a referendum “within 6 months” on the independence of Kurdistan. His argument was that his region no longer had a border with Iraq proper, only with Daesh, and that since Iraq de facto lay in pieces, the Kurds’ own aspirations may as well be achieved.

US President Barack Obama appears to have prevailed on Barzani to put away those plans for a referendum, in return for US air support in the struggle of the Peshmerga (the Kurdistan national guard) against Daesh. We haven’t heard much about the referendum until Tuesday.

It may be that Barzani now feels strong enough to buck the US (which is inclined to defend the national interest of allies in Baghdad and Ankara despite Washington’s close working relationship with the KRG). The US and Baghdad need the Peshmerga for the planned offensive against Daesh in Mosul later this year or early next, and perhaps Barzani is counting on being cut slack for that reason.

Turkey is extremely threatened by the specter of Kurdish nationalism and separatism, since it has a large Kurdish population of its own in eastern Anatolia and could be dismembered by a South Sudan scenario. Iran is also worried about Kurdish separatism, since it has its own province of Kurdistan, where some 4 million people live. Damascus is too weak to do anything about it, but it too would be opposed to an independent Kurdistan. Syrian Kurds in any case say they want a loose federal state in Syria where their Rojava or Kurdish super-province would have substantial states rights.

Barzani said Tuesday that now is the time for such a referendum: “The time has come and the conditions are appropriate now for the Kurdish people to take a decision via referendum regarding its future.” He added, “The referendum does not mean announcing the establishment of a state, but rather means that we would know the will and opinion of the people regarding independence. The Kurdish political leadership must implement the will of the people at the right tie and under the appropriate conditions.”

Al-Hayat points out that in recent years Iraqi Kurdistan has attempted to reinforce its semi-autonomy from the national Iraqi government via an oil pipeline through Turkey through which it can export petroleum independently of Baghdad.

Barzani said, “If the Kurdish people wait until someone else comes to offer them the right to self-determination, as a bestowal on them, then independence will never be achieved.”

Rudaw news agency reports his further remarks:

“It is clear to all that this region and Kurdistan in particular was divided without regard to the will of its indigenous people which in turn led to a hundred years of troubles, war, denial and instability. . . Those who caused this division know very well what a big mistake they made, but they are not ready to admit their political failure of the last one hundred years . . . It is not fair to discard the rights of the Kurdish people for political reasons or to appease others. Would they allow themselves to stop the rights of their own people? Kurdistan has every geographic, historic and human factor just as Scotland, Catalonia, Quebec and others do. The same way people in those places have the right to decide their future the Kurds too have that right and this is not open to argument.”

Al-Hayat says that Barzani’s critics are charging that his call for a referendum is a stunt whereby he is seeking to unite the very divided Kurds behind him. Barzani’s term as president actually ended last year, but no new elections have been held and he continues to cling to power.

12 Responses

  1. Iraq fractured and breaking into parts, ISIS thriving over there, secular violence, people unable to get employment, refugees, suicide bombs, Iraq in utter chaos, worse than when Saddam Hussein was the dictator….congratulations to Bush/Cheney and the neocons. Mission accomplished.

    • Bush/Cheney’s mission was to get reelected to second term – check.
      Neocons’ mission was to destroy an Israeli adversary – check.

  2. pretty hard to disagree with the quoted statement. iraq will not heal until it is broken up and the borders reconfigured. just let it happen already.

  3. Kurds are the largest stateless ‘minority’ in the world, with colonial era borders dividing their majority region between Turkey, Iraq, Syria and Iran. Certainly the Kurds do and have had a right of self-determination. However the forces in play point to bad luck in its achievement at present; the USA will give lip service to the ‘territorial integrity’ of Iraq to appease Baghdad and Ankara, even as it will exploit the Kurds in cynical geopolitical machinations on behalf of western multinationals with an eye (in the same moment) to poke Iran with a sharp stick (if only out of habit.)

    And, of course, there is always some sort of mafia-like involvement, in this case the KRG’s behind the scenes deal with Daesh and Exxon-Mobil where Islamic State oil has been laundered via the pipelines to Turkey in return for certain ‘security’ assurance for the pipelines themselves.

    In the land of ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend’ .. there is always a stage set for a backstabbing next scene –

  4. Couple of points-

    -I don’t think Ankara is actually threatened by Barzani and clan anymore. They KRG has Turkish trainers and troops on its soil, sells oil to and does a lot of business with Turkey. Declaring ‘independence’ would actually tie them more closely to Ankara, as if they are hostile to Baghdad they would be totally dependent on Ankara to market their oil. This is not a move the AKP will oppose, if anything the contrary. The PKK and Turkey have gone back to war, but if anything Barzani is more hostile to the PKK-YPG than Turkey, he isn’t Erdogan’s enemy.

    -This is a non-binding referendum, made while demanding cash. The KRG has been hit hard by low oil prices, Peshmerga and teachers are unpaid, services are falling apart. I suspect this is more about trying to squeeze Baghdad for money than a statement of Kurdish nationalism. Even if it fails to raise cash I suspect it is a bluff that will be allowed to quietly fade away.

    • You are quite correct. In fact, Erdogan (there’s nothing else in Ankara) is playing Good Kurd Bad Kurd, and Barzani is cooperating because his faction is not close with PKK/PYD. Recall a while back that Ankara did all it could to block Kurdish support for PYD in Raqqa but was ok with the Pesh coming down to fight.
      Other factor: “It’s the oil, stupid.”

      • In fact, this article on Erdogan’s potential new Kurdish “allies” (ask Gul and Arinc how that works out) notes one who enjoys Barzani’s blessing.

  5. The ongoing Russia-Turkey tensions are possibly another contributing factor re: the timing of Barzani’s decision, I suspect

  6. Actually there have been signs that Ankara is willing to tolerate Kurdish independence. Recall there was a brief rapprochement between Ankara and the PKK; when that fell apart Irbil renounced the PKK and has tolerated Turkish attacks on their positions in Kurdistan. Turkey also allowed peshmerga to transit its territory to reach Kobani. Finally, Barzani would not do this if he didn’t think Turkey would tolerate it, because Kurdistan is landlocked and they need Turkey to export their oil and otherwise have access to the world. I suspect that Erdogan has come to see this as inevitable and is working with the KRG and a framework for co-existence.

Comments are closed.