Does Fracking give you Cancer?

By Tom Giesen | (Informed Comment) | – –

Alarming and world-shaking new findings have emerged about the dangers of waste water from hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”). Researchers have assessed the potential health impact on human cells of back water from fracked oil and gas wells in upstate New York. The result? Human test tissues develop cancer when exposed to the toxic brew of chemicals in the water waste of fracking.

US fossil fuel companies have been ecstatic over shale gas fields like the Marcellus Formation that stretches from upstate New York into Pennsylvania and West Virginia in the Appalachian Basin. Lucrative natural gas is being extracted with the relatively new technology of fracking, i.e. pumping water underground under enormous pressure to break up shale rocks, releasing the gas.

Samples of waste water were taken from five Marcellus Formation mines, and caused malignancies in human bronchial cells. Barium and strontium (both highly toxic) were among the most abundant metals in these fracked water samples and the same toxic metals were found to be elevated in the test cells after long-term (6 week) treatment. The human cells were treated for 6 weeks with flow back waters. The experiment was designed to test whether the interaction of the flow back water causes tumors. The exposure produced human cell colony formation, i.e. a malignancy, thus validating the premise of the this study.

The same results were obtained from an animal study. Five out of six mice injected with cells transformed from flow back water treatments developed tumors (some as quickly as 3 months), while the mice injected with control clones did not form tumors after 6 months. These results show that exposure to Marcellus fracking flow-back water transforms normal human bronchial epithelial cells into cancerous tissues.

The Marcellus shale area is home today to at least 6,742 gas wells, virtually all of which are fracked. Each well may have multiple laterals, fracked separately. Each instance of fracking uses (on average) 5.5 million gallons of water, plus undisclosed additives. If each Marcellus well is fracked only once, the total water usage is 18.5 billion gallons, all polluted by a variety of noxious substances. Of the 18.5 billion gallons, 30-70% returns to the surface. If 50% returns to the surface, that brings up 9.25 billion gallons of polluted, toxic, carcinogenic water – and that is just in the area of the Marcellus formation developed to date.

The polluted flow-back water ends up lots of different places: some is disposed of via wells, some is trucked off to remote sites and dumped; some leaks from impoundments; some is dumped in creeks, rivers or on nearby land. In other words, the polluted water is spread over a wide area and has varied fates. This wide area in which the water is disposed of, and the variety of places it is disposed of, makes dealing with this pollution extremely difficult.

The toxic pollution law prior to the 2005 Energy Policy Act contained language that prohibited most pollution (via the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, etc.), but the oil and gas industry sheltered itself from liability with amendments, in the form of the 2005 Energy Policy Act, that permit varied and widespread pollution.

Those amendments added two exclusions to the definition of underground injection: “(i) the underground injection of natural gas for purposes of storage; and (ii) the underground injection of fluids or propping agents (other than diesel fuels) pursuant to hydraulic fracturing operations related to oil, gas, or geothermal production activities.” In other words, the “injection of fluids or propping agents” in hydraulic fracturing is completely unregulated – anything goes. This provision became known to its critics as the “Halliburton loophole” named after the oil-services firm Halliburton.

The hugely profitable US oil and gas industries have a very dark side, which hides the extreme consequences of drilling, hydraulic fracturing, and producing oil and natural gas. Fracking fossil fuels puts dangerous greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. But now a new danger is being signaled. If the experimental results described above can be replicated at other mines in the Marcellus Formation, and at other shale gas fracking sites, it will change our views of dangers posed by a major byproduct of fracking, the cancer-causing brew it leaves behind in our wells and aquifers.


Related video added by Juan Cole:

The Richard Fowler Show: “Carcinogens from Fracking Found in Texas Water”

2 Responses

  1. Fracking is a political problem. While it is a good thing to reduce burning of coal for electric power generation, it has been almost exclusively displaced by gas fired generation, not by renewables. Without this massive shift increasing natural gas consumption, the fracking industry would have collapsed because of low prices — as it is, natural gas remains near historic lows.

    Very soon the US will begin exporting liquefied natural gas and that will increase prices considerably. LNG export facilities are nearing completion. The US will become the third-largest EXPORTER of LNG. It will be “Springtime in America” for the frackers, and consumers will pay far more to heat their houses.

    Had their been a massive shift towards renewable energy this would not be happening. We can thank the Obama Administration policies for its enthusiastic encouragement of fracking and ignoring the pollution associated with it because of the “all of the above” energy policy.

  2. Fracking significantly depletes surface water supplies magnifying drought effects brought on by human-generated climate destruction, Surface water depletion forces local municipalities and agriculture to acquire water from ANY source – often sources far less potable. A single average injection well requires hundreds of thousands of gallons of fluid in the drilling process. Deep wells in Texas and Oklahoma required MILLIONS OF GALLONS in drilling. Since hydraulic fracturing commenced in the U.S. over 10 trillion gallons of fluid (SURFACE WATER) has been irretrievably poisoned and vanished in the process.

    Fracking, especially when conducted over major aquifers in Oklahoma and Texas, is flagrantly contaminating these aquifers with substances and constituents foreign to the natural contents of aquifers. There are well over 500 ingredients contained in fracking fluid and most are highly toxic, some radioactive and many of the ingredients are held as company/industry secrets.

    Aquifers intercepted by hydraulic fracturing are being enlisted for the enormous pressure within the aquifers themselves to augment the fracking process. In Oklahoma and now, Texas, recent earthquake swarms occur at the very same depth as the aquifers being contaminated. Some of the earthquakes have reached 5+ on the Richter Scale. At 3 to 5 miles down these earthquakes produce nuclear bomb forces in energy release. According to the USGS there are no earthquake faults in these regions to cause the quakes.

    The water contained in aquifers is one of the most important sources of water on our planet: More than 30 percent of our liquid freshwater comes directly from underground aquifers.

    Ingesting petroleum hydrocarbons in even minute amounts is a known carcinogen and is extremely well documented.

    In time, the fossil fuel industry will lose their media immunity over the facts about fracking. FRACKING INDEED CAUSES CANCERS! The CRIMINAL ACT of contaminating our underground aquifers will finally be identified.

    Until such a time, cancer outbreaks will become obvious near the more densely populated areas like Denton, Texas where local residents tried to ban fracking. Only to have the Texas State Legislature and Governor Abbott sign into law, a law banning the banning of Texas. This law prohibits Texas cities and towns from imposing local ordinances to protect themselves from fracking and harmful oil/natural gas activities. This law is in flagrant disregard of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S Constitution, public safety and reality.

    And laws like the Texas law are spreading (like) cancer within our country.

Comments are closed.