The Great Battle for Aleppo

By Juan Cole | (Informed Comment) | – –

Jordan’s Arabic daily al-Dustour [Constitution] is reporting on what it calls ‘the Great Battle for Aleppo.’

Such a battle isn’t, ideally, supposed to be taking place, by the terms of the cessation of hostilities reached in late November. The rebels in East Aleppo (pop. 300,000) and surrounding areas should have ceased attacks, and the regime in West Aleppo (pop. 2 mn.) should have ceased artillery fire. Both should have prepared for new elections in which they could choose members of parliament to their liking.

The cessation of hostilities never included the radical al-Qaeda affiliate, the Nusra Front or Support Front. It kept attacking regime-held areas south of Aleppo, trying to cut supply lines to West Aleppo. Unfortunately, some of the US-backed Free Syrian Army remnants allied with al-Qaeda in these offensives. Russia used air power to hit back hard, sometimes striking not al-Qaeda but US-backed rebels. Those attacks led US Sec. of State John Kerry to warn a couple of weeks ago that the US was losing patience with Russian and Syrian regime attacks on Free Syrian Army units. But Russia complains that Kerry, despite his promises, has been unable to separate the FSA fighters from their al-Qaeda allies, so it is inevitable that some of the former would get hit in Russian airstrikes on the latter. Last week the Russians said it is they who are losing patience, with the failure of the US-backed ‘vetted’ groups to dissociate themselves from al-Qaeda and its offensives, which break the cease-fire.

These squabbles over details cannot hide a very big elephant in the room, which is that Russia and the Damascus regime of Bashar al-Assad want to take East Aleppo.

This move is not justified in any defensive way. Al-Qaeda isn’t big in East Aleppo, though some of the FSA units have gone pretty far in the fundamentalist direction and are considered terrorists by Moscow. This offensive is a naked power grab, and if it succeeds it could translate into more years of survival for al-Assad and his Baath government.

Al-Dustour says that Russian and Syrian fighter jets (apparently in tandem) have for the past few days been subjecting East Aleppo and the area immediately to its north to intensive aerial bombardment, in support of Syrian Arab Army troops of the regime who are attempting to surround the opposition brigades in the east of the city. The SAA is being helped by Lebanon’s Shiite Hizbullah militia, which has vowed to send more fighters to Aleppo.

The aerial bombardment of East Aleppo did not stop Saturday night at all and continued into Sunday morning. The Syrian observatory alleged that the Russian strikes have been aimed at a road in the north of the city which constitutes the last supply route into the east. The Syrian air force has been bombing East Aleppo itself. Some three dozen have been killed by this bombing, including civilians.

—–

Related video added by Juan Cole:

AFP from a couple of days ago: ” Syrian regime airstrikes kill at least four in Aleppo”

Posted in Featured,Syria | 4 Responses | Print |

4 Responses

  1. What you are ignoring, is that East Aleppo is legally still part of Syria.
    How would Americans react if a foreign-backed terrorist army was occupying some of our territory and launching attacks from it?

  2. Every day ISIS and Al Qaeda have to indoctrinate Syrian kids and every day those kids don’t have schools and community to teach otherwise leads to the growth in support for the extremists for the next generations. Juan’s statement opposing the Syrian government and its allies fighting to remove the extremists from East Aleppo, “This move is not justified in any defensive way,” it appears does not deal with the reality on the ground.

    These sectarian religious terrorists were supported by the US when they fought to overthrow the Afghan government in the 1980’s. They were the enemy only after the 9/11 attack on the US. The US unleashed them in Iraq and Libya. And now they are supported again by the US as they join the US/NATO in trying to overthrow the Syrian government so that the US can install military bases there, deny Russia its naval base and turn over control of Syrian oil and pipelines to the US-based fossil fuel giants. Were it not for the complicity, funding, fueling, weaponizing and cover the US and its reactionary allies provide, the terrorists would fade away. Is it not terrible that the last thing the US wants to see in the Middle East is democracy?

  3. Is it really “a naked power grab” for a sovereign government to try to take back one of its cities? Or perhaps you have decided that the regime must be changed?

Comments are closed.