Obama: Hating on Muslim-Americans makes you an ally of ISIL, & Unamerican

By Juan Cole | (Informed Comment) | – –

President Obama is clearly concerned about the direction of the country and the mainstreaming of anti-Muslim hate speech, especially in the context of impossible-to-prevent lone wolf attacks like that at Orlando. He launched his fiercest attack yet on Donald Trump and warned of a repeat of the worst moments of American history, when the Federal government targeted our fellow citizens.

Aspects of the speech made me uncomfortable. Obama seems to have bought the story that Omar Mateen, the alleged Orlando shooter, had become self-radicalized by the internet. I have long been suspicious of this discourse, and in any case I doubt Mateen learned much about radicalism from the internet. He didn’t even seem to know that Hizbullah is a fierce opponent of ISIL on the Syrian battlefield, and said he was a member of both. Even a little cursory reading on the internet would have allowed him to avoid this . . . faux pas. Instead, the evidence is that Mateen was himself a closeted gay man who frequented the Pulse club, and very possibly lost a lover, driving him over the edge. The invocation of ISIL was meaningless.

Obama, having accepted the radicalization narrative, went on to speak about how his administration is rolling the actual ISIL back in Iraq and Syria. He pointed out that ISIL has lost 50% of the territory it had in Iraq, and that it is about to lose Manbij in Syria, which will cut off the capital of the phony caliphate, al-Raqqa, from supplies and reinforcements coming in from Turkey.

All this is true. Daesh or ISIL is being rolled up and it is a little unlikely we’ll be talking about it a couple of years from now. But Muslim radicalism isn’t being rolled up, and it will just take on a different name and identity. GW Bush’s killing of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in 2006 did not destroy the budding Islamic State of Iraq. US or Iraqi military strike that dispatched ISI leader Abu Omar al-Baghdadi did not destroy the movement, then the Mesopotamian affiliate of al-Qaeda. Obama’s assassination of Usama Bin Laden had no effect on the holy warriors in Syria who idolized him. So killing Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (Ibrahim al-Samarrai) won’t end ISIL. It will just devolve back into a terrorist group from having been a puritanical state.

Obama also shows awareness that radicalism appealed to Syrian and Iraqi Sunni Arabs because they felt mistreated, humiliated and excluded by their governments. Obama expressed confidence about the Iraqi government, ruled by the Shiite fundamentalist Da`wa or Islamic Mission Party, will become more inclusive of Sunnis. What universe is he living in?

Then he pledged to continue to support the cessation of hostilities in Syria, which began amazingly well but has gradually fallen apart.

Obama’s faith in a post-Daesh political settlement in both Syria and Iraq seems so unlikely as to appear pollyannaish. More likely, some angry and humiliated Sunnis will keep on being excluded and keep on deploying the tactic of terror.

But Obama ended his speech by coming back to the domestic issues.

“We now have proposals from the presumptive Republican nominee for president of the United States to bar all Muslims from immigrating into America. And you hear language that singles out immigrants and suggests entire religious communities are complacent in violence.

Where does this stop? The Orlando killer, one of the San Bernardino killers, the Fort Hood killer — they were all U.S. citizens. Are we going to start treating all Muslim-Americans differently? Are we going to start subjecting them to special surveillance? Are we going to start discriminate them, because of their faith?

We heard these suggestions during the course of this campaign. Do Republican officials actually agree with this?

Because that’s not the America we want. It does not reflect our Democratic ideals. It won’t make us more safe, it will make us less safe, fueling ISIL’s notion that the West hates Muslims, making Muslims in this country and around the world feel like, no matter what they do, they’re going to be under suspicion and under attack.

It makes Muslim-Americans feel like their government is betraying them. It betrays the very values America stands for.

We have gone through moments in our history before when we acted out of fear, and we came to regret it. We have seen our government mistreat our fellow citizens, and it has been a shameful part of our history.

OBAMA: This is a country founded on basic freedoms, including freedom of religion. We don’t have religious tests here. Our founders, our Constitution, our Bill of Rights, are clear about that.

And if we ever abandon those values, we would not only make it a lot easier to radicalize people here and around the world, but we would have betrayed the very things we are trying to protect.

The pluralism and the openness, our rule of law, our civil liberties, the very things that make this country great. The very things that make us exceptional. And then the terrorists would have won and we cannot let that happen. I will not let that happen.

These are noble sentiments and Obama did the right thing in standing up to Trump over his hateful remarks against Muslims. He is right that the strategy of Daesh/ ISIL is to get Americans to mistreat Muslims and drive them into the arms of Daesh.

But when Obama kept saying that US counter-terrorism forces “know who they are fighting,” implying it is radical Muslim fundamentalism, he suggested that he doesn’t use the terminology ‘radical Islam’ purely for diplomatic reasons, not that the phrase is wrongheaded. (But it is wrong-headed: Islamic is like Judaic, it has the connotation of the good and ideal elements of the Islamic religion.)

Still, Obama is correct that it is un-American to single out people for special mistreatment based on their religion, or to blame 1.5 billion Muslims for the actions of one unstable man. And it is excellent that he spoke out. It is also a piece of irony, since the Trumpofascists had been implying or saying that you can’t be a good American if you or your parents were born abroad. The president has a loud megaphone, and he has put it to good use in standing up for the Bill of Rights. As he reminded us, undermining the Constitution to get at threats to the Constitution is a fool’s errand.


Related video:

The White House: ” President Obama Delivers a Statement to the Press”

16 Responses

  1. The still sitting president and Nobel prize laureate of 2009 should have a lower profile, really. He asks, “Where does this stop?” Obama has escalated a drone war to an extent nobody could ever imagine. He once joked, “Turns out, I’m really good at killing people.”
    link to huffingtonpost.com
    In a constitutional democracy that would have prompted prosecutor investigation. He should have asked himself, “Where does that stop?” Sad conclusion, that won’t stop, neither with Trump or Clinton, rather the opposite.

  2. Are we going to start treating all Muslim-Americans differently? Are we going to start subjecting them to special surveillance? Are we going to start discriminate them, because of their faith?

    Didn’t the FBI and all the alphabet soup agencies in “homeland security” down to local police departments practice exactly that on Obama’s watch?

    Apparently Obama apart from refusing to look backwards, does not look sideways either, but is only looking forward (to having a legacy cum library).

  3. Trump’s bad talk on Muslims is peanuts in comparison with our leaders’ very bad actions on Muslims.

  4. making millions of iraqi people refugees while destroying large cities “makes you an ally of isil” and sadly very american.

  5. “The invocation of ISIL was meaningless.” — If so, why’d he do it?! There had to be some intent there.

    • It is meaningless because were ISIL to be defeated tomorrow, we would still face the threat of radically-directed or inspired terrorism, either from abroad or at home. President Obama would have us believe that advances against ISIL equate to advances against terrorism. Such religious and ideologically inspired terrorism will not stop with the defeat of ISIL.

      Moreover, as others have pointed out in other threads, just because someone like Mateen was not conversant with all aspects of Islam–Sunni or shia–does not mean there is not a religious component motivating his actions. Many people act without fully understanding the religious principles that in whole or in part justify their actions, in their own minds at least.

      Mateen was clearly a very troubled man, but it would be folly to pawn his actions off as merely being a manifestation of nihilism or homophobia without any religious component driving them.

  6. One of the best speeches Obama has ever given. Hit the right tone, hit the right points. Of course, it won’t make a damned bit of difference to the wingnuts, but it frames the debate clearly.

    • Nor will it likely influence many Americans and others who have come to regard anything Barack Obama says with skepticism.

      • I’d be more generous. Obama’s not perfect but on the whole has done far more good than bad – and in the face of no shortage of obstacles.

  7. What American values were at work when we cheered the invasion of Iraq, then basically ignored the consequential destruction of the country. President Obama can order the destruction of any target, or person, in the Middle East (except any in Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, Israel, and Egypt) and most Americans, and 99% of our politicians would not bat an eye.

    Likewise no eye batting if Daesh, or some other activity blows up a market place , killing 50 shoppers.

    America has very strong positive values, but they end at the shore, where “don’t tread on me and my national interests” begin.

  8. All the slicing and dicing of the lone shooter Orlando Massacre is well and good. But it clouds the fact Trump and his ilk want to actively exclude brown-skin people and LGBT from their Trumpmania dream of a white male dominated racist Christian pseudo-theocracy.

    Media •••clown Donald Trump is a toon for a far more odious movement of extremism in our country.

    Our President is very correct in calling presumptive Republican nominee Trump out for his naive stupidity and anti-American treachery.

  9. Please spare us this moral sophistry, everyone knows who has turned a blind eye to daesh financing and if Russia had not expose the theft of Syrian oil and the illicit trade with Turkey, it will still be an ongoing.
    And if “mistreatment, humiliation and exclusion by their governments.” Was a license for terrorism, our very own allies in this fight would be in Syrian shoes. Would you explain to this American, what are These American values you are brandishing on and off and how they differ from universal human value. Maybe trump can use them to make America great again.

  10. He talks from some Norman Rockwell cloud cuckoo land that never existed off the covers of the Saturday Evening Post. A splash of fact based realism wouldn’t go amiss. But then I imagine he’s had enough by now, just coasting through his last months.

  11. As if Obama and Clinton’s foreign policy decisions in Libya, Syria did not fuel the growth and power of ISIS.

    Somehow Obama’s foreign policy decisions seem to mostly get a free pass on being dug into my corporate media outlets

  12. The war in the Middle East and terrorism are very complex issues. The President is not there to explain all the complexities, which 98% of the people either don’t care about or couldn’t understand. He has to simplify things in order to expose the dangerous aspects of Trump’s policies. The criticisms in the article and many of the posts here are rather nit picking and don’t understand how political speeches are supposed to work. This was a good political speech. It was not meant to be a tutorial on these complex subjects. Read some of the speeches of FDR before WWII, for example. His genius was in simplifying complex issues in order to mobilize the US populace, not explain all the ins and outs of international relations.

Comments are closed.