Did White House interfere with FBI Probe of Russia Ties?

By Nika Knight, staff writer | ( Commondreams.org ) | – –

Brazen attempt at political interference provokes comparisons to Watergate

White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus attempted to interfere with an FBI investigation into the White House, CNN reported Thursday. (Photo: Getty)

White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus contacted the FBI and asked them to deny reports that the Trump campaign was in contact with Russian intelligence agents before the November election, CNN reported Thursday, citing multiple U.S. officials who asked to remain anonymous.

Such a request would mark a stark breach of protocol put in place to ensure that FBI investigations remain free of political interference.

As Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), a member of the House Judiciary Committee, told the Guardian: “The White House is simply not permitted to pressure the FBI to make public statements about a pending investigation of the president and his advisers.”

The Guardian explained the protocol reportedly violated by Trump’s White House:

A 2009 memo from the then attorney general Eric Holder says the Justice Department should advise the White House on pending criminal or civil investigations “only when it is important for the performance of the president’s duties and appropriate from a law enforcement perspective.” …

The New York Timesstory on communications between Trump campaign aides and Russian officials was published on February 14. Soon thereafter, “White House officials had sought the help of the bureau and other agencies investigating the Russia matter to say that the reports were wrong and that there had been no contacts, the officials said,” CNN reported.

The brazen attempt to interfere with an active investigation reminded some of President Richard Nixon’s Watergate scandal, during which Nixon tried to use the CIA to quash the FBI investigation of the Watergate burglary.

The outrageous breach of protocol has fueled calls for Priebus’ resignation.

“This is plainly a White House that has no compunction about asking the federal law enforcement apparatus to run its errands, and to operate as barroom bouncers on call whenever the jefe feels inconvenienced,” wrote Esquire‘s Charles P. Pierce. “At least Nixon hired his own investigators when he got pissed at newspaper leaks. These clowns tried to turn the FBI into the Plumbers. It’s going to get really crowded in D.C. parking garages pretty soon.”

“Where will transgressions end?” tweeted Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) co-founder Norm Eisen:

Meanwhile, the only public response President Donald Trump has had to the story thus far is to take to Twitter and attack the FBI: “The FBI is totally unable to stop the national security ‘leakers’ that have permeated our government for a long time,” Trump tweeted.

In fact, it seems that instead of an independent investigation into the reports of ties between Trump aides and Russian officials, the American public may only see an investigation into “low-life leakers” conducted by a billionaire Trump ally, as Common Dreams reported.

Via Commondreams.org

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

———

Related video added by Juan Cole:

The Young Turks: “Trump Administration Told FBI To Back Off Russia?”

Shares 0

4 Responses

  1. It seems increasingly obvious that Trump knows there is information out there that will sink him. And he may actually believe that distracting people with one half-baked headline-grabbing measure after another, constantly attacking the press, and above all his projectile lying, will mask the situation and keep him safely in office until he is rescued by events (fire, anyone?).

    If that works, the American people shouldn’t be surprised, having taken their eyes off the ball for so many years.

  2. Remember that similar tactics worked very well for Hitler. One doesn’t need the approval of reasoning citizens to corrupt a democracy. To convert the US into an authoritarian state may only require the support of authoritarian followers.

  3. Facts break regarding POTUS and illegal ties to Russia during the Presidential campaign.

    link to nytimes.com

    During the embarrassing bat•••• crazy press conference on Feb. 16th the new POTUS deriding all reports on his aides’ ties to Russia as “a ruse” and “fake” while conceding that the cascade of leaks on the subject was real. He said he had fired his former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, because “he didn’t tell his our vice-president properly” about his calls with the Russian ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, but he insisted that there was nothing improper about making the calls.

    At which point Reince Priebus directs Comey.

    link to theguardian.com

    Then the Denial

    link to theguardian.com

    And accidental admission of guilt.

    link to theguardian.com

Comments are closed.