Congress kills Privacy, Lets Corporations Sell your Browser History

By Ernesto Falcon | (Electronic Frontier Foundation) | – –

Putting the interests of Internet providers over Internet users, Congress today voted to erase landmark broadband privacy protections. If the bill is signed into law, companies like Cox, Comcast, Time Warner, AT&T, and Verizon will have free rein to hijack your searches, sell your data, and hammer you with unwanted advertisements. Worst yet, consumers will now have to pay a privacy tax by relying on VPNs to safeguard their information. That is a poor substitute for legal protections.

Make no mistake, by a vote of 215 to 205 a slim majority of the House of Representatives have decided to give our personal information to an already highly profitable cable and telephone industry so that they can increase their profits with our data. The vote broke along party lines, with Republicans voting yes, although 15 Republicans broke ranks to vote against the repeal with the Democrats.

Should President Donald Trump sign S.J. Res. 34 into law, big Internet providers will be given new powers to harvest your personal information in extraordinarily creepy ways. They will watch your every action online and create highly personalized and sensitive profiles for the highest bidder. All without your consent. This breaks with the decades long legal tradition that your communications provider is never allowed to monetize your personal information without asking for your permission first. This will harm our cybersecurity as these companies become giant repositories of personal data. It won’t be long before the government begins demanding access to the treasure trove of private information Internet providers will collect and store.

While today is extremely disappointing, there is still tomorrow. Without a doubt Internet providers (with the exception of the small providers who stood with us) will engage in egregious practices, and we are committed to mobilizing the public to push back. EFF will continue the fight to restore our privacy rights on all fronts. We will fight to restore your privacy rights in the courts, in the states, in Washington, D.C., and with technology. We are prepared for the long haul of pushing a future Congress to reverse course and once again side with the public.

Via Electronic Frontier Foundation

[Ed. note: Everyone should now be using a Virtual Private Network, which can be installed on your browser very easily. Contrary to what some have alleged, I don’t find that it slows down browsing at all. If you don’t use a VPN now, you may as well publish a public daily list on the web of the sites you visited. Universities often offer VPNs to anyone associated with them, including alumni. Here are PC Mag’s recommendations.

For anything very private or sensitive, or if you live under a brutal dictatorship, you should be using the Tor browser. ]


Related video added by Juan Cole:

Newsy: “Trump to decide future of internet user data”

3 Responses

  1. Thanks for the link to PC mag. Even with it, researching this subject, picking a product, and using it properly looks complicated. Another gift from the Republicans. It must be nice to have an employer who takes care of such things.

  2. Thank you for link to PCmag it is indeed helpful. However, you should have listed some VPNs here as well.

    Secondly, @boomer VPN doesn’t need to be complicated if you just know the basic purpose of using it. take for instance link to the service provides you with huge pool of IPs that you can use to cloak your presence on the internet. It also offers 256bit encryption that encrypts all your online activities including your chat, discussions, browsing activity, online transaction data, and finally it also offers multilogins with a single account so that you dont need to buy multiple vpn ids for every device in your home.

  3. When the internet was young, it had the essential characteristics of a “free market”, i.e. numerous, fragmented users and suppliers. Now, large corporations have captured and consolidated key market segments, allowing them to set up “our way or the highway” market conditions which mainly benefit their shareholders. These quasi-monopolists can lobby our legislators and co-opt govt. regulators. Households and small enterprises remain disorganized and fragmented, thus lacking collective bargaining power needed to assert their collective interests.

Comments are closed.