Why no Eclipse Denialists? The Same Science predicts Global Heating

By Juan Cole | (Informed Comment) | – –

Eminent physicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson’s tweet pointing out that there are no eclipse denialists the way there are dedicated climate change denialists went viral:

It is worth exploring this point today, when an eclipse will cast a shadow across a large swathe of America. Let’s review why we are confident in making this prediction:

Shannon Schmoll, Director, Abrams Planetarium, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, writes at The Conversation:

Solar eclipses happen when our view of the sun is blocked by the moon. When the moon lines up between the sun and Earth, the moon will cast a shadow onto Earth. This is what we on the ground observe as a solar eclipse.

We know when they’ll happen because over centuries astronomers have measured very precisely the motions of the Earth, moon and sun, including their orbital shapes, how the orbits precess and other parameters. With those data about the moon – and similar information about the Earth’s orbit around the sun – we can make mathematical models of their movements in relation to each other. Using those equations, we can calculate tables of data that can predict what we will see on Earth, depending on location, during an eclipse as well as when they will happen and how long they last. (The next major solar eclipses over the U.S. will be in 2023 and 2024.)

Note that Professor Schmoll says that predicting eclipses involves making mathematical models.

The same thing is true of climate change.

But Exxon-Mobil and the Koch brothers and other oil, gas and coal interests worth billions of dollars are paying people to muddy the waters. Maybe the earth isn’t warming. It is. Maybe it is because of sunspots or tree-pollution rather than from people setting coal on fire. It isn’t.

In fact, we are all climate criminals and saboteurs. The US is putting 5.4 billion metric tons of CO2 into the atmosphere every year. Year in, year out. We should be rapidly reducing our carbon footprint. We aren’t. You’re endangering your grandchildren. If you own a house and can afford to put up solar panels but haven’t, I urge you to do it. If you can bike or use public transportation, or can afford an electric car, do those things. I have solar panels and my average electricity bill this summer has been $14 a month. I bike around town in the good weather, which is good for my health, saves money on gas, and produces no CO2. We can all do things to reduce our carbon footprint. Even just eating less beef would make a huge difference.

Global heating is caused by spewing poisonous carbon dioxide and methane gases into the earth’s atmosphere. The main source of CO2 and methane emissions since 1750 has been human industrial and agricultural activity. The invention of the steam engine and the decision to fuel it by burning coal, and then later on the invention of the internal combustion engine and the decision to fuel it with petroleum, were fateful for the amount of carbon in the atmosphere. The atmosphere had roughly 260 to 270 parts per million of CO2 for thousands of years before 1750. That number is now 405 ppm of CO2, which has never before been the case during the short time, 150,000 years or so, that Homo Sapiens Sapiens (i.e. you and I) have existed on earth. Never in history have the parts per million of CO2 nearly doubled in only two and a half centuries. In geological time, volcano eruptions were the main reason for rising carbon dioxide, but it took millions of years of such volcanic activity to put that much CO2 up there.

Carbon dioxide and methane are greenhouse gases. The sun rays that strike the earth from the sun heat it up. Usually much of that heat radiates away back into space. Greenhouse gases keep more of the heat on earth and do not allow as much to radiate away. You want some greenhouse effect, or you would get a very cold world like Mars, which has such a thin atmosphere that it can’t retain much of the sun’s heat at all. But if you get too much of a greenhouse effect, you get a hellhole like Venus, where lead melts and runs in streams on the surface. The earth isn’t in any danger of becoming Venus. It is in danger of losing all its surface ice, losing 1/3 of the land mass to sea level rise, and experiencing Frankenstein severe weather– stronger hurricanes, long-term droughts, storm surges, etc.

We know that more CO2 and methane in the atmosphere will cause the average surface temperature of the earth to rise through exactly the same mathematical modeling that lets us predict eclipses.

That the world is on average heating up isn’t in doubt. Most of the records for hottest year since data began being systematically collected in 1880 have been set in the past 15 years. Older people like me have seen the heating with our own eyes.

The only question is whether we go up on average 4 degrees F. or 15 degrees F. Hint: 4 degrees F. will be more pleasant.

There isn’t any doubt about all this, any more than there is doubt that the moon will block out the sun for millions of Americans later this afternoon.


Related video:

Great American Eclipse 2017: How to safely view a solar eclipse, according to NASA – TomoNews

7 Responses

  1. We all hoped Trump would be a harmless glitch in the American experience but sneering at climate change is only one symptom of Trumps lackadaisical attitude towards potential cataclysmic dangers lurking.

    You must read Michal Lewis’s Vanity Fair article in which he explains how Trump putting Rick Perry in a position formerly held by a nuclear physicist is like giving a child a loaded gun that could kill us all.

    link to vanityfair.com

  2. Corey Courtney Sanford

    My fav was someone asking a “flat earther” how to explain the eclipse (they have a YouTube video for everything) and the guy was all “uh I’ll have to get back to you.”

    • The shadow of the moon can fall upon the sun as seen from the surface of a flat earth in the same way it can be from a round earth.

  3. Taking bets: Trump interprets Solar Eclipse as a divine blessing on his presidency. “Obama never had this kind of support.” Pence chimes in.”Praise Jesus. He loves Republicans.”

  4. Yes, the deniers are indeed odd.

    They happily listen to scientists when predictions tell them things they want to know, like where to dig for oil or when the tides will provide the best surfing or the days to not go sailing because a tropical storm is expected.

    But the moment that science might threaten their business interests, then they denounce reports created by scientific method as being unreliable and “fake”.

    • Premise: God placed “us” on this planet to conquer it and live as gluttons in His name.

      Corollary: Scientists exist only to discovery those facts necessary for this endeavor, not to tell us why we’re thus committing suicide.

Comments are closed.