Israeli forces suppress protests marking Balfour Declaration centenary

Ma’an News Agency | – –

BETHLEHEM (Ma’an) — Clashes erupted between Palestinians and Israeli forces in Bethlehem city on Wednesday following a march commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration, the 1917 document which supported establishing a Jewish state on what would become British Mandate Palestine, and paved the what for the to the establishment of Israel.


Palestinian protesters marched from the southern to northern ends of the city, until they reached Israel’s separation wall. Protesters set up an effigy of Arthur Balfour, the author of the declaration, beating and throwing shoes at the figure while burning a copy of the declaration.

Members of various Palestinian political factions had called for the march in protest of the 100 year anniversary of the declaration, and of recent comments by British Prime Minister Theresa May celebrating the centenary of the declaration.


Israeli forces quickly suppressed the protest, using live ammunition, rubber-coated steel bullets and tear gas, injuring one with a rubber-coated steel bullet in the foot, while several others suffered from severe tear gas inhalation.

Palestinians have viewed the declaration as paving the way for the creation of the state of Israel at the expense of the land’s original inhabitants.


The declaration was made before the British had wrested control of Palestine from the Ottoman Empire, and was not made public until several years after the World War I, in 1920.

By that time, Britain had been formally granted a mandate over Palestine by the League of Nations, and was struggling with its contradictory obligations of “rewarding” Arabs for their support during the war, while also fulfilling their pledge to create a Jewish state.

After World War II, British forces withdrew from Palestine, leaving it in the hands of the newly created United Nations, which favored partition, particularly as evidence slowly emerged of the vast scale of the Holocaust in Europe.


The decision led to the 1948 war between Arab nations, including Palestinians, and Jewish immigrants, ultimately resulting in the creation of the state of Israel and the expulsion of more than 700,000 Palestinians from their homes inside its borders, an event known as the Nakba among Palestinians.

Via Ma’an News Agency

3 Responses

  1. I’ve heard some mention on BBC World Service of the 100th anniversary (though not specifically about the clash reported above). So far, I haven’t seen or heard anything on US MSM. Lots about the terrorist in NYC, but not about what would prompt such terrorism (except, of course, that “they hate us because we are free.”)

    I learned only recently that the UK sought and received President Wilson’s approval before issuing the Declaration.

    “British officials asked President Wilson for his consent on the matter on two occasions – first on 3 September, when he replied the time was not ripe, and later on 6 October, when he agreed with the release of the declaration.[132]”
    link to

    • A search on Google News does now turn up a few references to Balfour in the US media, and also this informative piece from Israel,

      “Britain’s True Motivation Behind the Balfour Declaration:
      Why the British thought a vaguely worded statement would galvanize American Jewish support for World War I – and how it became the engine that led to the State of Israel

      Shlomo Avineri Nov 02, 2017 2:33 PM

      read more: link to

  2. “In his official report to the British Parliament on the [August] 1929 ‘disturbances [i.e., violent rioting],’ Sir Walter Shaw acknowledged that ‘there had been no recorded attacks of Jews by Arabs’ in the previous eight decades and ‘representatives of all parties’ had concurred ‘that before the [First World] War the Jews and Arabs lived side by side if not in amity, at least with tolerance.’ The aggravating factor, Shaw was forced to admit, was the 1917 Balfour Declaration, which promised British support for the creation of a Jewish homeland in Palestine, such that ‘the Arabs have come to see in the Jewish immigrant not only a menace to their livelihood but a possible overlord of the future.’” (Shaw’s findings were largely repeated in the 1936 Peel Commission’s conclusion.) link to

Comments are closed.