Informed Comment Homepage

Thoughts on the Middle East, History and Religion

Header Right

Donate

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Email
  • RSS
  • Featured
  • US politics
  • Middle East
  • Environment
  • US Foreign Policy
  • Energy
  • Economy
  • Politics
  • About
  • Archives
  • Submissions

© 2023 Informed Comment

  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Islam

In the Muslim Scriptures, making Peace takes Precedence (re: Juan’s new Book)

Juan Cole 10/29/2018

Tweet1
Share663
Reddit
Email
664 Shares

The chapter of The Cow in the Qur’an, 2:224, says,

    “Do not render your oaths in God’s name an obstacle to being pious and godfearing, or to making peace among people. Truly God is All-Hearing, Omniscient.”

As with many Qur’an verses, the exact issue here is not clear, since the Prophet Muhammad recited the Muslim holy book, the Qur’an, in the context of the society of his time–a context that wasn’t always reliably recorded by later generations.

But it seems fairly obvious that Believers in Muhammad’s mission around 623 CE, after they and the Prophet had emigrated to Medina from Mecca under pressure from militant pagans, were excusing themselves from certain moral obligations on the grounds that they had made a vow, in which they had invoked God.

The Qur’an is instructing them that their ethical duty is to principle, not to an arbitrary oath.

And the higher ethical calling is to be a peace-maker among the sometimes fractious clans of the western Arabia city of Medina. The verb for “peace-making” can also mean to do good or to reform, but here since it is followed by the prepositional phrase “among the people,” it sees clear to me that it bears the sense in context of “to make peace.”

I discuss many such passages and incidents in my new book,


    Muhammad: Prophet of Peace amid the Clash of Empires, just out

    *Now* available for order at Barnes and Noble

    And Nicola’s Books in Ann Arbor

    And Hachette

    And Amazon

The Qur’an is not discounting the power of an oath that contained the name of God. It does, however, seem to say that if the pledge of an individual is getting in the way of peace-making, it should be set aside in favor of working to achieve social harmony.

I’m just speculating here, but it is possible that members of a clan had taken an oath never to work with members of another clan whom they believed to have treated them unfairly. Later Muslim sources, at least, maintain that Medina was full of clan feuds. The Qur’an is prioritizing peace-making above such past vows, even if they were made invoking the name of God himself.

Despite its lack of context in the Qur’an itself, we can conclude from the verse that it places peace-making at the pinnacle of ethical virtues and wants to ensure that lesser obligations never interfere with people making peace.

Filed Under: Islam, Qur'an

About the Author

Juan Cole is the founder and chief editor of Informed Comment. He is Richard P. Mitchell Professor of History at the University of Michigan He is author of, among many other books, Muhammad: Prophet of Peace amid the Clash of Empires and The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam. Follow him on Twitter at @jricole or the Informed Comment Facebook Page

Primary Sidebar

STAY INFORMED

Join our newsletter and have sharp analysis delivered to your inbox every day.

Twitter

Follow Juan Cole @jricole or Informed Comment @infcomment on Twitter

Facebook



Sign up for our newsletter

Informed Comment © 2023 All Rights Reserved

Posting....