( Middle East Monitor ) – Once again, the so-called “most moral army in the world” flexes its muscle, not against a military threat or armed combatants, but against a small humanitarian vessel brimming with conscience and compassion.
The Madleen carried no missiles, no drones, only sacks of rice, baby formula, and prosthetic limbs intended for Gaza’s war-wounded. Yet in the official Israeli narrative, this peaceful mission was cast as a “political provocation” and an “illegal operation.”
On board were a sitting Member of the European Parliament, internationally recognised environmental activists, respected journalists, and representatives of humanitarian organisations. Still, the Israeli navy intercepted the vessel in international waters, detained all on board, and severed their communication with the outside world, an act more reminiscent of medieval piracy than of a state that claims to uphold international law.
The question then arises: who is truly breaking the law? Is it the human rights defenders who sought to deliver aid to a population besieged, starved, and threatened with annihilation for over seventeen years? Or, is it the military force that violates freedom of navigation, obstructs humanitarian assistance, and imposes collective punishment on more than two million civilians?
According to international law and the basic principles of justice, the answer is clear. The blockade imposed on Gaza has been found to breach international humanitarian law, as confirmed by a United Nations fact-finding report following the Mavi Marmara incident. The International Committee of the Red Cross has described the blockade as a form of collective punishment, which is explicitly forbidden under the Fourth Geneva Convention. Furthermore, the deliberate starvation of civilians and obstruction of humanitarian relief, practices documented in Gaza, are classified as war crimes by the UN Human Rights Council.
Freedom of navigation is also enshrined in international law. The 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea affirms that the high seas are open to all states, and every state has the right to sail vessels under its flag freely. The interception of Madleen in international waters is a blatant violation of these rights and cannot be justified by any legal standard.
Providing humanitarian aid is not only morally necessary but legally mandated. The Fourth Geneva Convention obliges the free passage of food, medical supplies, and other essential aid to civilian populations. Arbitrary denial of such consignments constitutes a breach of humanitarian law. The Freedom Flotilla, therefore, is not a provocation, as Israel alleges, but a lawful and ethically grounded act of solidarity with a besieged people.
The Madleen was no warship. It was a floating declaration of conscience. On board were figures such as Greta Thunberg, the renowned environmental activist; Rima Hassan, the French-Palestinian Member of the European Parliament; and Omar Faiad, a journalist from Al Jazeera Mubasher. Their presence dismantles the Israeli narrative and reveals an occupation regime so threatened by peaceful solidarity that it responds with violence.
The history of breaking sieges to deliver aid is long and honourable. From Yemen and Sri Lanka to Kosovo, East Timor, and even Europe during the Second World War, civilian vessels have challenged blockades to bring relief to suffering populations. History remembers those who acted with courage and compassion, and condemns those who enforced inhumane restrictions.
What Israel deems “illegal” is, in truth, both legally justified and morally essential. What it labels “lawful” is, in reality, a continued crime against an already devastated people.
“Madleen,” Digital, Midjourney, 2025
Madleen is more than a ship. It is a symbol of resistance. A light in dark waters. Proof that global conscience, though battered, is not dead.
Legitimacy does not reside with those who extinguish life, it belongs to those who strive to protect and restore it.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor or Informed Comment.
Unless otherwise stated in the article above, this work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
© 2025 All Rights Reserved