Gainesville, Florida (Special to Informed Comment) — With the Trump administration rolling back essential health insurance protections and rejecting a national, single-payer health insurance program, America’s race to the bottom continues full steam ahead for millions of Americans with pre-existing health conditions. The Administration will now amend the Biden-era rule that limited the duration of short-term plans to no more than four months, and says it will not enforce the current rule, including the time restrictions and new consumer notification requirements, in the interim. It is refusing to enforce a Biden-era rule limiting junk short-term health plans that are notorious for charging more or denying coverage altogether for people with conditions like asthma, diabetes, and cancer.
“At a time when the health care system is already in crisis, Donald Trump is launching another attack on people with pre-existing conditions. Short-term junk plans are allowed to deny coverage, drop people when they get sick, and exclude life-saving coverage such as prescription drugs and hospital care, leaving families with sky-high bills and nowhere else to turn. This is a direct attack on Americans with pre-existing conditions, putting their health and financial security at serious risk. It seems the President has forgotten the 2018 midterm election.”
In service to the health insurance industry, junk plans always prioritize profit over people. While they may deliver some small, short-sighted, fleeting economic benefits, the long-term costs —to individuals, families, communities— are far greater because lifesaving health care services are threatened for those who need them the most.
Building on other efforts to further sabotage and undermine quality health care insurance for all, President Donald Trump and the GOP had previously proposed very similar “association health insurance plans” that let small businesses band together and insure themselves or buy insurance as a group. Association health plans have a bad track record over the past 10 years, with dozens of court cases and enforcement actions by federal and state officials. Many turned into criminal cases involving fraud, embezzlement, diversion of premiums and mismanagement, leaving employers and employees with millions of dollars in unpaid medical bills.
Just like the latest proposed “STLDI” plans, Trump’s previous association health plans were not required to provide essential health benefits like mental health, substance abuse treatment and drug coverage, and claim they are exempt from all state insurance laws under Trump’s executive order. When toxic plans like this are approved, it’s clear that our health-insurance system is broken. Like a cracked pipe, money gushes into our health-care system but steadily leaks out. Money is siphoned into the advertising budgets of private-profit insurance companies and the army of corporate bureaucrats working to deny claims. Even more dollars are soaked up by the pockets of insurance CEOs who have collectively earned $9.8 billion since the Affordable Care Act was passed in 2010. Nearly a third of all of our health-care dollars go to something other than health care.
Another example is the deceptive appeal of Trump’s profitable “copper catastrophic” plans. They are stunningly inadequate plans that have very low premiums because their actuarial value is only a pathetic 50 percent, giving the illusion of health insurance coverage. They cover an average of about half of health-care costs. In 2017, the deductible for these plans was $7,150. These plans will work great if you never get sick or have an accident.
Offering only deteriorating financial protection, especially those with larger deductibles, this downward trend can produce severe adverse consequences for the physical, mental and financial health of the insured. Because of the spartan nature of the newly proposed STLDI catastrophic plans, the adverse consequences can be anticipated to be even more severe.
1). Short Term Limited Duration Insurance (STLDI) plans systematically discriminate against individuals with pre-existing conditions, and against women.
2). These plans offer bare bones coverage, including major coverage limitations that are not always clear in marketing materials, making it difficult for consumers to know what they are buying.
3). STLDI plans offer wholly inadequate protection against catastrophic medical costs.
4). Some STLDI plans impose draconian coverage limitations even for illnesses, injuries, and conditions arising after a consumer purchases a policy.
5). On average, less than half of the premium dollars collected from consumers are spent on medical care.
6). STLDI plans engage in heavy-handed back end tactics to avoid paying medical claims that do arise.
Photo by Jonathan Borba: https://www.pexels.com/photo/man-wearing-blue-scrub-suit-and-mask-sitting-on-bench-3279197/
b). By eliminating waste and corporate profiteering in health care, the bill would save hundreds of billions annually that could be invested in actual health care, resulting in better, more equitable health outcomes.
c). By covering everyone without the copays, deductibles, and insurance networks that deter care and drive medical debt, M4A would achieve universal and comprehensive coverage, while assuring real choice of physician, mental health / health professional and hospital.
d). By eliminating profiteering and wasteful insurance bureaucracy (plus the administrative costs that bureaucracy inflicts on healthcare providers), it would — according to the Congressional Budget Office — free up $400 billion annually in funds that could pay for the cost of such coverage expansions and improvements.
e). Medicare-for-All could also effect a much needed shift in the ownership of care away from increasingly dominant private corporations to public ownership by Americans and their communities.