Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Friday, March 10, 2006

Quran Quote of the Day on Peace

The fourth chapter of the Quran, "Women," addressed the early Muslim community in Medina during the 620s, at a time when they were being attacked by the powerful pagan Meccans, who were trying to wipe them out. The Quran repeatedly commands the Muslims to defend themselves from these Meccan infidels and polytheists, who worshipped star goddesses (think Venus) and refused to permit the new monotheistic teachings of Muhammad. The Quran objects on spiritual grounds to the Meccans' polytheism, but it was only when the Meccans tried to ethnically cleanse the Muslims that it commanded them to fight back.

But there were non-Muslim, including pagan, tribes with whom the Muslims had reached peace treaties, with whom they were not at war. So the question arises-- what if a new non-Muslim tribe shows up in the area? Are the Muslims to treat them as enemies or not? Remember that they are pagans, or at least non-Muslims, and entering the war zone of Western Arabia. This is what the Quran says about pursuing warfare in these ambiguous circumstances:


[4:90] Exempt those who join a people with whom you have concluded a peace treaty, and those who come to you with hearts unwilling to fight you, nor to fight their relatives. Had God willed, he could have placed them in power over you and they would have made war on you. Therefore, if they leave you alone, refrain from fighting you, and offer you peace, then God gives you no way to go against them.



(Cole translation, influenced by several existing ones, but done from the Arabic text.)

The Quran lays down in 4:90 the rules governing such a situation. Muslims are not to fight tribes under these conditions:

1. If the new tribe joins up with a tribe in the area with which the Muslims are at peace, then the Muslims are to act peacefully toward the new one.

2. If the new tribe shows up in the region and lets the Muslims know that they have no desire to attack Medinah or the Muslims, then the Muslims are to act peacefully toward it. Some of these tribes may be related to the Muslim tribes of Medina, and that may be one reason they are inclined to peace. The inclination must be returned under these circumstances.

The Quran reminds the Muslims that they benefit from peace with the peaceful. If they had to fight all the tribes in Arabia, they might well be conquered. Returning peaceful intentions in kind is a sort of "social intelligence" that allowed Muslims to focus on the real threat, the profound hatred for them of the Meccans, while living at peace with the neutral Arabs.

The default in the Quran is therefore not aggressive warfare, something the book repeatedly condemns. Warfare is permitted in self-defense. But the default is to be at peace with those who are at peace with you.

3 Comments:

At 10:21 AM, Blogger Rich C said...

Dr. Cole,

Thanks very much for posting you translations of key parts of Quran. I've recently been reading the work of Sam Harris whose End of Faith made a bit of a splash a few years ago. I don't know if you're familiar with his work, but Harris is an atheist who - while he rails against all dogmas - focuses special attention in Islam. Harris argues that the Quran contains innumerable calls for violence against no-muslims and glorifys martydom. In his book in particular, he cites at least 10 pages worth of very martial-sounding text from the Quran and the Hadiths. One of Harris' arguments is that islamic beliefs contribute in a key way to jihadist violence, and that this contribution cannot be exused as a misreading of these texts (Quran & Hadiths). I share Harris' atheism, but I'm very skeptical about his take on Islam, or his interpretation of its role in contemporary jihadist armed struggle organizations, in part because he doesn't seem to speak Arabic. I wonder if you at some point might want to comment on his work (see www.samharris.org, he also posts on The Huffington Post).

 
At 5:04 PM, Blogger roozta said...

Thanks for pointing out this critical piece of information and putting things in the proper context. I've seen a lot people quote one or two lines from the Quran (which they probably got second hand) and make wide generalizations based on those without understanding the historical context of what was happening at the time.
Many people don't realize that fighting was completely forbidden for the very early Muslims. It was only later when it became clear that the powerful Meccan tribes wanted to wipe out the Muslims that they were allowed to fight back. Even then, as you point out there were restrictions in place; it was never a declaration of war on every non-Muslim.

 
At 10:17 PM, Blogger Sulayman said...

Thanks a lot, professor.

I really appreciate your defense of Islam against incorrect accusations. I'm always surprised how people pull strange verses out of nowhere (likely google) and then use it to judge all modern Muslims based on an english out-of-context interpretation. This post, the last one, and the "Friedman Wrong about Muslims Again" are perhaps my favorite of your posts.

I think America won't have a decent understanding of the Middle East until we wipe out these simple incorrect assumptions and prejudices. I appreciate your writings, and look forward to your editorials.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home