Bin Laden Urges Jihad in Sudan
In another reminder that George W. Bush has still not caught the man responsible for September 11, while he has mired tends of thousands of US troops in an unrelated Iraq quagmire, the murderous lunatic Usamah Bin Laden spoke again on Sunday. I don't know how Bush lives with himself. He has squandered 5 years of unparalleled power and opportunities, and has nothing to show for it but national bankruptcy and national humiliation.
Former US diplomat John Brown is eloquent on Bush's failures at Tomdispatch.com.
Bin Laden [Ar.], in a new videotape played on Aljaazeera, called on holy warriors and their supporters in the Sudan and neighboring areas, including the Arabian peninsula, to prepare to conduct a long-term war against “the Crusader thieves in Western Sudan.” (I.e. Bin Laden expects that US or European troops will intervene, perhaps under a UN banner, in the Darfur conflict. He urged them to become knowledgeable on western Sudanese tribes. He warned that Western powers intended to exploit “some of the disputes among the tribesmen, and to provok war among them that eats both the green and the dessicated, in preparation for the sending of Crusader forces to occupy the region and to steal its petroleum und the cover of preserving order there.
The mass killer said that his goal is to defend Islam and its people, not to prop up the Sudanese government. He said that the Sudan crisis is taking place in the framework of “a continuing Crusader and Zionist war against the Muslims.”
In fact, of course, regional separatism on the part of the Muslim Darfur people has been met with attacks by Arabic-speaking black Africans insistent on keeping the region part of Sudan, ruleed from Khartoum. Tens of thousands have been perished or been displaced by the conflict, which has nothing that I can discern to do with the United States or Israel, except that they have condemned the killing. There is no petroleum to my knowledge in Darfur.
Bin Laden also denounced the treaty that ended the civil war with the largely Christian and animist southern Sudanese, saying that it promised them too much autonomy from Khartoum.
He said the US had adopted an old British imperial plan for the division of the Sudan, and that the British had divided the Sudan from Egypt. (I think actually that the Sudan has the territory it does because it was a British colony and that was what the British wanted in it. They could have divided it easily when they ruled it. As for division from Egypt, you'd have to talk to Sudanese nationalists about that; I recollect that they weren't eager to be ruled from Cairo. Modern Egypt only began conquering the Sudan in 1822, and never ruled it with any firmness before the British took both in the 1880s, so it isn't as if Sudan has always been part of Arab, Muslim Egypt or anything).
Bin Laden also maintained that the siege mounted against the Hamas government in Palestine once it won the recent elections proves that there is a "Crusader, Zionist war" against the Muslims. He notes that Ayman al-Zawahiri had counseled Hamas from getting involved in the political process.
Actually, what all this proves is that the United States and Israel allowed Hamas to run in the Palestinian elections, and to win them. That's a war? And now all they ask is that Hamas renounce terrorism and recognize the parties with which it will have to negotiate, which its leaders refuse to do. (One has to admit, though, that letting Hamas win and then punishing it in various ways hasn't been the most productive way to proceed).
Hamas quickly moved to distance istself from Bin Laden's pronouncements, saying that they were his personal interpretation, and Hamas had its own. The Palestinian movement constantly has to attempt to keep outsiders from hitching a ride on their popularity in the Muslim world, most often for purposes extraneous to the true welfare of the Palestinian people. They won't let Bin Laden coopt them.
Bin Laden has survived, and he is still taunting the US, and still attempting to polarize Muslims and Westerners. His tapes have far more influence and resonance than Americans realize. He needs to be caught and silenced, and US and Israeli actions that needlessly alienate the Muslims need to cease, as well. Otherwise, our world is willy nilly being seduced by the inferno of hatred at the core of al-Qaeda and its Christian and Jewish counterparts.

|
18 Comments:
Singing from the Same Sheet
How convenient that that blast from the past, the greatest Bush-booster of all time, Osama-you-can't-find-me-if-
you-don't-look-for-me bin Laden, picks up, as if on Rovian cue, the long-term war theme, the main meme of the Defense (speaking loosely) Department, the Long War. They hope.
No bake sales needed to raise funds for DOD equipment while this particular micro-threat is out there with recording equipment within reach.
I'm not sure why you call Bin Laden a lunatic. He seems eminently sane to me, at least in his public persona. He's pursuing his goals in a completely thought-through and effective strategy. For a very small price, certainly less than a dozen cruise missiles, and a single attack on several buildings well chosen and less losses (only some dozens of his own forces), and less collateral damage even than our own many cruise missile strikes (only some 3000 civilians dead on 9/11), he's got everything he wanted, multiple civil wars, a humiliated giant, and a set of circumstances that might well result in liberating his home country, which seems to be his aim. Even if he is eventually caught, and I assume he will be, eventually, perhaps at a time of his own choosing, his own martyrdom will further his cause. That's the way I see it and mostly from information from your own blog, and tell me where I'm wrong. His stroke of 9/11, however he manufactured it, was a military act of genius, or it would be so considered had it been done by, say, Churchill. Hard to imagine a single act that would so marry physical violence (minimal when you measure it against what it's set in motion), the contemporary technological situation (jet planes with their fuel and the high buildings) with symbolic precision, and a psyching out of his enemy, understanding our cultural mindset, the psychology of both our people and our leaders, and finally sheer luck (he couldn't have planned it as well as it turned out). It was brilliant, not cowardly, and looked at from a military standpoint (i.e. how 'wars' are fought), simply nonpareil in the annals of warfare and nationhood. Tell me the specific act in history that equals it. "Fanatic' maybe but not 'lunatic', certainly 'murderous' and horrible but then what would you call several of our leaders? They're not insane, simply misguided, acting on some very basic human emotions/thoughts/patterns of behavior. The basic instincts behind all war and national violence are part of our evolutionary heritage and remain to be addressed. Calling them 'lunatic' simply doesn't seem to me adequate, even misleading, and, dare I say it, not well-informed. But, as I say, tell me where I'm wrong.
Hi...
You mentioned something that I want to ask about: the MSM reports that one of the parties to the Sudan conflict are Arabs - but this is wrong isn't? Aren't they Arabic speaking Africans, as u mentioned in this piece, not ethnically Arab? How could they get is so wrong?
M
Do you really believe that this end-stage renal patient, Usama, is still alive? What has concinved you that this tape is authentic despite previous audio and video tapes that have been unsuccessfully liked to Bin Laden?
This is a purely academic question I am asking, since the mythologizing of Al Queda has far overshadowed the logistical significance of this group.
Then perhaps Osama is just a prop and Sept. 11 was simply a manufactured event designed to perpetuate endless conflict. Only to be posed when Bushes political card houses come tumbling down as with the CIA firing, Rove waiting for an indictment, poll numbers, fear itself, etc. I thought we already knew that, many do.
The brutal cold fact about Darfur is the slaughter of non combatants. The causes, players, alliances and history still seem murky, however. We hear that Christians and animists are chief among the victims, and then we hear that by a huge majority the dead are Muslims. We hear oil has little to do with it, then we hear it may have much to do with it. [See this post at TheOilDrum http://www.theoildrum.com/story/2006/4/15/184447/733 and Kristoff's op-ed on Sunday bringing in Chinese and oil.]
So though I wish it didn't take clarity to stop the slaughter, getting a firmer grip on the players and the reasons might help to know where best to scream.
Then perhaps Osama is just a prop and Sept. 11 was simply a manufactured event designed to perpetuate endless conflict. Only to be posed when Bushes political card houses come tumbling down as with the CIA firing, Rove waiting for an indictment, poll numbers, fear itself, etc. I thought we already knew that, many do.
Then perhaps Osama is just a prop and Sept. 11 was simply a manufactured event designed to perpetuate endless conflict. Only to be posed when Bushes political card houses come tumbling down as with the CIA firing, Rove waiting for an indictment, poll numbers, fear itself, etc. I thought we already knew that, many do.
The deal of the 21st century - Bin Laden empowers Bush and Bush empowers Bin Laden.
9/11 gave a weak mediocre president a just cause, a sympathetic and supportive public, and a bi-partisan mandate for action. We all know now that he caught the ball and ran in the wrong direction.
Empowered by 9/11 Bush was free to make one blunder after another without fear of accountability. No number of follow-on terrorist attacks could possibly do the damage to the US that has been done by the post 9/11 Bush adminstration and its supporters in congress. I'm sure Bin Laden knows that.
And it works both ways. 9/11 should have replaced any positive respect Bin Laden might have had with disgust. He rightfully earned his public enemy #1 label. But by invading Iraq, and cultivating the notion of war to the finish between the West and radical Islam, Bush empowered Bin Laden. When you are under attack by the most heavily armed nation in the world, you take any leader you can get. Does Bush know or care about this?
To my understanding, it is an audio tape, and I have difficulty in accepting it as authentic. Call me a conspiracy nut, but I find it a bit odd that the only current video of Bin Laden arrived on the eve of the 04 election, with him quoting Michael Moore! If he was truly capable of making a video then, why haven't we seen more of him?
I would guess that this is actually a desparate psyops ploy to try to lure eager would be jihadists away from the Iraqi combat zone to a place where they won't be confronting U.S. troops.
1. It is possible to be a fiendishly clever lunatic. Bin Laden declared war on the United States, he and his buddies. Obvious delusions of grandeur. It is an audiotape. I heard it on Aljazeera. I just misspoke.
The Darfur conflict is among Black African Muslims. It is not just an ethnic struggle, it is about regional separatism. Most American copy writer tag lines on it are wrong or misleading.
I'm skeptical, too.
UBL is angry with Khartoum so he is going to fight any future UN mission there?
Do you have the text of this message? Any decent chance it is a forgery, produced by parties with US sympathies, who want American citizens to think UBL is behind the mess in Sudan, so that they will want to continue America's wars by invading there?
Sudan was one of the original five or six countries constantly mentioned by the Bush administration.
Here is a complicated looking linguistic map.
For example, it is obvious that the "famous" (i.e. oft mentioned by Bush, Cheney and Ledeen) Zawahiri-Zarqawi letter is obviously a fraud.
What better way to get Americans into a war in Sudan other than putting UBL there?
For example, UBL talks about oil in Sudan, but there is no oil in the Darfur region, or at least no oil concessions.
The obvious perpetrators of such a fraud would be ardently Christian Americans in the intelligence industry, governmental or ex-governmental.
On Bin Laden's tape
In the whole, Bin Laden’s recent message looks like a perfectly crafted vicious anti-Western PR operation which, as usual, takes full advantage of the global context.
To begin with, recently the UN and international justice have suffered quite a number of heavy blows to their authority. Here is just a brief list:
-- The whole situation in Iraq.
-- I’d remind the infamous Oil for Food scandal.
-- Current nuclear controversy with Iran. Iranians were as compliant with NPT as it gets, but now, not surprisingly, Ahmadinejad clearly and explicitly threatens to quit it.
-- As a result of US/Israeli policy of isolating Hamas, UN does not really function as a diplomatic tool to manage the I/P conflict and ME crisis.
-- Circumstances of Milosevic’s death were highly damaging for the UN reputation.
So, as far as crisis in Sudan is concerned, normally, UN should take care of it. However, with all of the above in mind, it is hard to imagine how this can be done in any practical terms.
Now Bin Laden takes advantage of the perils of Al-Queda’s arch-foes and proclaims that any international involvement in this region is a "Zionist Crusade" - in more neutral terminology this can be translated as islamophobic enterprise.
What is worse, Al-Queda intellectuals forgot more about situation in Sudan than neocons ever knew. So, they outline concrete accusations against the US which must strongly resonate both in Sudan and in the Muslim world in general.
Apparently, in the Palestinian part of its recent message, Al-Queda takes advantage of the Israeli threat to reoccupy Gaza. What happens is that Al-Queda, as all competent observers of I/P, understands perfectly well that, unlike spineless Fatah, Hamas will not wink. Quite on the contrary, Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other radical Palestinian factions can be fully expected to go on escalating the conflict.
In case of possible reoccupation, there is no way that they will cooperate, so Israelis will have to enforce the direct military rule – as before Oslo. To make things worse, with Western aid to PA currently suspended, there will be no more “deluxe occupation”. Can the West help Palestinians directly through Israel? This will look exactly like situation in Iraq with its stalled reconstruction!
In this dead-end situation, all Bin Laden has to do to get closer to the mainstream Muslim opinion is to express general solidarity wihh Hamas - which is exactly what he does. The conclusion is, now it must be clear that over-optimistic assessments of Bin Laden’s last message as an act of desperation are just cheesy PR, they have very little to do with actual situation.
I heard the audiotape of Bin Laden, and personally I don't have any doubt that it is the old terrorist himself.
He is saying that the Khartoum/ Darfur struggle is splitting Muslims and that the West will try to take advantage of that to break up the Sudan and dominate it and its resources. It is classic al-Qaeda thinking.
One person sees the Darfur conflict as one about land. The advance of the desert forces herders to move and they take over farm land. These are the observations of Lester Brown, author of 60 books about the environment and founder of the Earth Policy Institute as well as other organizational work.
He puts Sudan in the context of the possible environmental collapse of the globe. Something new in the last few decades are failed states. For example, Somolia does not have a government, just a bunch of tribes.
To clarify your position on this tape as being authentic, I would ask you one further question.
In 2002, scientitsts from the Dalle Molle Institute for Perceptual Artificial Intelligence in Switzerland were 95% certain that an audiotape attrubuted to Usama was a forgery.
This begs the question of the authenticity of other tapes alleged to be from Bin Laden.
Putting aside the content of the tape for a moment, as ideological continuity from 'the base' could easily be maintained, what differences have you noted from this most recent audio tape and that of the questionable one in 2002?
“There is no petroleum to my knowledge in Darfur”
Juan: You might want to do a bit of research, and reconsider this point.
Actually there would seem to be quite a bit, (Google: Darfur oil ), and people corporations and countries appear to be fighting over it. In south and west Darfur definitely, and the oil/gas bearing geologic formation extends northwesterly into Chad, generally following the border region between south Sudan (with oil lease sectors the area of Texas) and border areas near Chad, Central African Republic and Cameroon along the Doba basin http://www.unitedreef.com/oil.htm and the Central African Rift geologic formation.
Exxon Mobil has a big oil/gas deal signed with Chad, but most of the big 5 US/British OilCo’s have been kept out of the new rich (ultra-light sweet crude) south/west Sudan crude leases http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/ZYG409A.html . See also this: Tactical Use of Genocide in Sudan and the Five Lakes Region
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=GER20060217&articleId=1994
Post a Comment
<< Home