Iraqi Civil War leaves 22 Dead
Iraqi Islamic Party Charges US with Massacres
In the continuing Iraqi Horror Picture Show, police found 9 heads along a road at Hadid in Diyala on Tuesday, wrapped in plastic and stuffed in fruit cases.
Guerrillas also targeted a funeral procession in southeast Baghdad with a car bomb, killing 5 and wounding 18.
In central Baghdad, guerrillas tried to hit a US military convoy with a roadside bomb, near the Allawi bus station. Instead, they killed a woman and wounded a child.
Guerrillas fired three mortar rounds at the Iraqi Interior Ministry, which they have hit before. Instead, the shells landed at the Nadha bus station, leaving two civilians dead and 7 wounded.
Guerrillas also assassinated a Baghdad district council member, Thu`ban Abdul Kadhim, and his two bodyguards in the Jihad district of the capital.
Reuters also mentions two other incidents:
"BAGHDAD - A man and his wife were gunned down in the western Furat district, medical sources said. . .
BAGHDAD - A roadside bomb killed one woman in Baghdad. Two people, including a teenage girl, were later killed when police who had sealed off the area opened fire when their car failed to stop despite warnings, witnesses said."
The dead woman has been mentioned twice, but subtract one mention and the total above comes by my count to 22.
I continue to feel that we are getting only a small part of the picture of Iraqi violence. I was listening to NPR this afternoon in the car, and the report said that US troops had killed about 100 guerrillas in Ramadi during the past month. I think it fair to say that almost none of those deaths was reported in the media. And, a lot of assassinations and kidnappings must go unnoticed in the glare of the big bombings.
The Iraqi Islamic Party on Tuesday accused the United States military of having committed numerous massacres against innocent civilians, not only Haditha. Specifically, its spokesman, Omar al-Juburi, charged that:
' "On May 13, US forces launched an air assault on a civilian car in Latifiyah and killed six people inside the car," Juburi told reporters.
"On the same day the US forces attacked with aircraft the house of a civilian, Saadun Mohsen Hassan, and killed seven of his family members."
Juburi said US forces carried out another air strike the next day on the house of Sheikh Yassin Saleh Shallal in the town of Yusifiyah "killing 13 people, including women and children." '
I am afraid that if we started counting all the innocent civilians killed by US airstrikes on Iraqi towns and cities as murders, the number would be very large indeed.
The significance of these charges is that they are coming from the Iraqi Islamic Party, a group that has been mostly willing to cooperate with the US. Indeed, al-Zaman says that they handed the file to US Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad. The IIP forms the core of the Iraqi Accord Front, the Sunni religious coalition that holds 44 seats in parliament. A vice president, a vice premier, 4 cabinet members, and the speaker of the house all belong to this coalition. So these charges are originating not with hard liners or radicals outside the new system, but with persons who are de facto allies of the United States. If this is how a key element of the Iraqi Accord Front feels about the US, relations between Washington and parts of the new government it so trumpeted are obviously very shaky.
Al-Zaman reports that the Sunni Arabs of Basra are mostly forced to stay at home, going out only when absolutely necessary, for fear of being assassinated or kidnapped. They are virtual prisoners in their homes.
The assassinations are ongoing, despite new security steps of the al-Maliki government. The day before yesterday, a Sunni Arab was killed in the middle of Basra. Sunni Arabs also pray at home rather than going to mosque, for fear they would be targeted or captured. Sunni Arab government employees have begun staying home and missing work in ever greater numbers.
The state of emergency declared by PM al-Maliki has not brought security. A wave of assassinations, mostly aimed at Sunni Arabs, has swept Basra.
The Arab League is preparing to send a commission to Basra, at the request of the Sunni Arabs. (Arab League member states have as their citizens mostly Sunni Arabs.)
Meanwhile, al-Zaman says, hundreds of British troops have spread through Basra neighborhoods, arresting persons on its list, who belong to the Mahdi Army or Iraqi military intelligence. (The latter in Basra was presumably mostly recruited from the Badr Corps paramilitary of the [hard line Shiite] Supreme Council).
US troops risk brain injury by returning to duty with even mild concussions.
This communique from the Baath Party on June 1 will be completely ignored by the public and even by Iraq analysts. But in my view it probably issues from the circle of Izzat Duri or his successor, the likely spider at the center of the guerrilla web. It is much more important than anything Abu Musab al-Zarqawi says.
Most Iraqis are poor. Those that aren't don't let on about their wealth. Or else.
An Iraq War veteran has called for Fox pundit Bill O'Reilly to apologize for mistakenly asserting that US troops massacred German POWs at Malmedy (it was rather the other way around). O'Reilly speaks a lot in public and one inevitably makes mistakes occasionally. But he really should have just apologized for this howler. Fox doctored the transcript sent to Lexus Nexus, substituting "Normandy" for "Malmedy," referring to the US reprisals for the German atrocity.


10 Comments:
I came across this reporting on Iraq from nearly 50 years ago, which may or may not provide some perspective on today's Iraq. If schoolboy George Bush had been assigned to write a report on the country for his sixth-grade class, this no doubt would have been a source.
From an article in the October 1958 National Geographic by Jean and Franc Shor:
There is an ominous air about a country on the eve of revolution. My wife Jean and I spent three months in Iraq early this year, and we felt it everywhere. . . .
In country villages the radios in public squares were almost always tuned to Radio Cairo and its litany of hate for the West. In Baghdad crowds complained when we tried to take pictures anywhere but in the most modern sections of the city. And too many people with whom we talked echoed the pat phrases of anti-Western propaganda.
We had to discharge one interpreter because he began each day with a recital of that morning’s tirade from Gamal Abdel Nasser’s transmitter. . .
Iraq is, of course, undergoing a tremendous political upheaval. . . .
Iraq’s basic problem has little to do with politics; it is as old as the story of man’s struggle against nature. It is the problem of water; how to put it to the best possible use. And now, in the 20th century, another fluid has seeped into the equation.
Oil, which has brought the Near East vividly into the spotlight of world affairs, is making it possible for Iraq to take giant strides in its age-old struggle with water. This is one place where oil and water mix. As our plane swept northward from Basra toward Baghdad, my Iraqi seatmate pointed through the window. . .
“Oil is a fine thing . . but you can’t plant it. Water is far more important. Most natural resources are replaceable. . . .But once you take the oil out of the ground, it is gone forever. . . .We’re using the revenue from our petroleum to create replaceable resources. Seventy percent of our oil revenue – and that might amount to $200 million this year – is turned over to a government organization called the Development Board. The board invests in long-term projects which will keep our economy sound long after the last drop of oil has been drained from the earth.” . . .
Unrest flared in July into the revolution which cost young King Faisal and Prime Minister Nuri al Said their lives, and resulted in the establishment of a provisional republic. . .
Jean and I had our own experiences with the deep dissatisfaction the Arab population of Iraq feels with its economic lot. Nearly everyone, we found, was enormously self-conscious about the country’s backward aspects and determined that Iraq should be presented to the world in its most modern light. . . .
This intense nationalism does not center upon devotion to Iraq as a country, but upon the Arab heritage of its citizens. Almost without exception, the people we talked with considered themselves Arabs, and regarded their Iraqi citizenship as incidental. We never encountered actual anti-American emotions: Rather there seemed to be a distrust of the Western World’s approach to the Arab people.
Our first surprise was the discovery that Iraq, which we had pictured as a desert country, has never suffered from a shortage of water, although some of its people have. The problem is rather one of control and distribution. The two great rivers, the Tigris and the Euphrates, run the length of the California-size country, and even in dry years they carry billions of tons of water from the mountainous north to the Persian Gulf. . . .
The present population of Iraq is about 6 ½ million; experts believe that with proper utilization of land and water the country could support more than 20 million people. . . .
In our air-conditioned Semiramis Hotel room we packed for our homeward flight. I came upon a postcard showing the Eternal Fires ablaze near Kirkuk.
“Want to keep this?” I asked, tossing it to Jean.
“I think I will,” she responded. “Reminds me of Iraq – and of this whole area. When you look at this, you realize what a lot of highly inflammable matter lies just below the surface; waiting for something to set it off.”
Actually, a separate transcription service organization did O'Reilly's transcripts, so his supporters could legitimately claim O'Reilly wasn't lying. However, once Olbermann called foul on it, either the service or Fox News altered the website to reflect the actual words used, "Malmedy."
Who is the real target of the recent "state of emergency" in Basra?
Professor Cole's report that British forces are targeting Sadrists is crucial information, if not particularly suprising. It may raise questions, however, about the state of the political alliance between PM Maliki and the Sadrists, no?
The idea that British forces are also targeting SCIRI's Badr Brigades would be much more surprising. Back in the days when SCIRI controlled the Basra Provincial Council (until ousted by Fadhila in the January 2005 elections), the British never seemed to mind Badr Brigade control of the streets--even when in meant harsh Islamic moral codes were imposed.
FYI: I've been trying to make some sense of the politics of the Basra "state of emergency" over at profcutler.com
I'm surprised you are being so easy on Bill O'Reilly... very surprised. This guy is worse than every other right-wing authoritative b.s. artist because people actually believe what he says, and he lies....constantly! He never retracts his statements when he openly lies and this time will be no different. His behavior is consistently outrageous and I feel that should be pointed out rather than an excuse made that he talks a lot in public.
Most Iraqis are poor. Those that aren't don't let on about their wealth. Or else.
If I recall correctly, after botched raids or instances of wrongful death, American forces would sometimes provide quick remuneration to victim's families. The sum, and the very prominent way it was acquired, would simply attract much unwanted attention. I imagine the moment the American's departed the survivor's windfall would be rapidly extorted by the first group on the scene with guns - adding insult to injury you might say.
Iraq seems to be just exponentially unfortunate for those unlucky enough to be resident during the continuing crisis.
A few courts martial and oxymoronic "battle ethics" courses may salve US conscience, but not change what actually happens.
Counterinsurgency correlates with civilian carnage, no matter what. The correlation his higher where there are potent religious and cultural cleavages. Fatigue, drugs, or ethics training have at most a secondary impact.
Soldiers that face a hidden guerrilla foe cannot survive by giving the benefit of doubt to every face on the block. There is not even a handy "profile" to screen suspects, since nearly anyone is a potential hazard. There is probably no "clean" way to assault a suspected safe house.
Point-blank execution of ostensible civilians is not supported by any law or official doctrine. Yet civilians are the "sea" which supports the insurgent "fish." We can comfortably denounce such events from afar. However, think of losing comrades day after day to IEDs or sniper fire in a strange place where the civilian witnesses are unhelpful, deceptive, or hostile. You yourself might be the next to be maimed or killed. To be blameless, must the soldiers put up with this indefinitely, Christ-like, and never crack? Perhaps hypothetically, but in reality many will fail and respond in rage.
With all the ghoulish carnage that Iraqis are commiting against each other, it seems churlish to hold some outnumbered and naive outsiders to a higher standard. This is not to excuse the US atrocities, but to put them in context.
The real responsibility lies at the top: a failed mission and a doomed strategy. Unfortunately, the people at the top remained protected by the myths of a sacred war on terror and military chivalry, plus the public's stubborn misunderstanding of where things are going. People have a Stephen Ambrose image of warfare they don't want to discard. There is also a sorry lack of attractive alternative strategies. Critics say the US should just get out ASAP, but with no inkling of the electoral disgrace and recrimination that will fall on the party that makes this decision, whether that of the Decider or his practical clone (Hillary). Voters do not reward candor or remorse.
I have two comments on this.
Firstly, The Independent has reported extremely high death rates in Iraq this year. See for example here.
Secondly Le Monde Diplo has a fascinating article on the evolution of Iraq's resistance.
In the continuing Iraqi Horror Picture Show, police found 9 heads along a road at Hadid in Diyala on Tuesday, wrapped in plastic and stuffed in fruit cases.
With the murderous rampages of "ordinary" US armed forces at Lisgah and Haditha, the tip of the iceburg, in the news is it so far-out to imagine that the daily murder toll in Iraq is wrought in large part by death sqauds on the US payroll, a la El Salvador option?
Afterall it's the same gang of murderers and war criminals in power in the present US regime, Rumsfeld, Negroponte, et al, as was in charge during the regime that brutally murdered thousands by proxy in Nicaragua, Honduras and El Salvador.
The reporting on Countdown which I read yesterday indicated that the Malmedy story was not a mistake at all. Rather, there is a bizarre Conservative myth about how the Nazi massacre was really an invention of Jewish-American US military leadership to smear the poor German soldiers, and it was Senator Joe McCarthy in the early 1950s who tried but failed to expose the truth. Like I said, bizarre.
Point-blank execution of ostensible civilians is not supported by any law or official doctrine. Yet civilians are the "sea" which supports the insurgent "fish." We can comfortably denounce such events from afar. However, think of losing comrades day after day to IEDs or sniper fire in a strange place where the civilian witnesses are unhelpful, deceptive, or hostile. You yourself might be the next to be maimed or killed. To be blameless, must the soldiers put up with this indefinitely, Christ-like, and never crack? Perhaps hypothetically, but in reality many will fail and respond in rage.
If you were speaking of the Palestinians and of their responses to losing comrades every day to Israeli assassinations and sniper fire then you'd be a target of denunciation by Thomas Freidman's "Truth squads" at the State Department, John Koch.
I just read an interview with Friedman done by Amy Goodman at Democracy Now! wherein Friedman restates Pipes' dream :
"After every major terrorist incident the excuse makers come out to tell us why imperialism, Zionism, colonialism or Iraq explains why the terrorists acted. These excuse makers are just one notch less despicable than the terrorists and also deserve to be exposed. Every quarter the State Department should identify the top 10 hate mongers, excuse makers and truth tellers in the world."
But of course you're safe. You are not insisting that the US/Israeli Axis' acts in the Middle East over the past four or five decades have consequences. You are instead "excusing" the acts of Americans in response to acts of Iraqis in response to acts of Americans at the behest of the neocons.
I think mentioning Jesus Christ in the same sentence as the Xtian soldiers run amok in Iraqi is just a bit beyond the pale?
Post a Comment
<< Home