Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Thursday, June 08, 2006

Zarqawi Killed in Baquba

Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki announced Thursday morning that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi had been killed, along with 7 aides, in a US airstrike. [Early press reports incorrecting reported the death came in a gun battle with US and Iraqi troops at Baqubah].

Zarqawi had been a significant leader of the Salafi Jihadi radical strain of Islamist volunteers in Iraq, and had succeeded in spreading his ideas to local Iraqis in places like Ramadi. He engaged in grandstanding when he renamed his group "al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia," even though he had early been critical of al-Qaeda and had a long rivalry with it. For background, see the Zarqawi file.

There is no evidence of operational links between his Salafi Jihadis in Iraq and the real al-Qaeda; it was just a sort of branding that suited everyone, including the US. Official US spokesmen have all along over-estimated his importance. Leaders are significant and not always easily replaced. But Zarqawi has in my view has been less important than local Iraqi leaders and groups. I don't expect the guerrilla war to subside any time soon.

Baqubah is dangerous not because of Zarqawi but because it is a mixed Sunni-Shiite and Kurdish area that had Baath military installations and arms depots, and enough Sunni Arabs from the old regime know about them to work them against rising Shiite and Kurdish dominance.

On the other hand, there have been persistent reports of a split between the main arm of the guerrilla resistance, the Sunni Arab Iraqis, and Zarqawi's group.

Al-Hayat reports today [Ar.] that groups in Fallujah have launched attacks on Zarqawi followers there after the latter attacked the al-Husain Mosque in the Askari quarter two days ago, destroying the tomb of the founder of the mosque within it. (Salafis influenced by Saudi Wahhabism despise attendance at saints tombs, insisting on a Protestant-like elimination of all intermediaries between human beings and God. Many Islamists in Fallujah are actually Sufis, who value saints in the way rural Catholics do.) An attempt by the radical Salafis to destroy the mosque (on the grounds that it had been tainted with polytheism) was stopped by the "1920 Revolution Brigades," a local ex-Baathist group. There was a running gun battle between the two.

Zarqawi's group had also tried two days ago to attack a Fallujah police station, but they were repulsed by local tribal youth. The battle left two cars burned and 4 dead from the tribe of Al-Bu `Isa.

25 Comments:

At 3:28 PM, Blogger ent lord said...

Just as observation, the BBC is reporting that he and his aides were killed by an American air strike at a safe house as part of a joint American/Iraqi operation. CNN was showing footage of armed civilians (militiamen?) walking around a ruined building, picking up odd bits of clothing and bedding. CNN reports that Iraqi leaders within Al Qaeda in Iraq turned him over to the Americans, while a streamer mentions that information from Jordanian intellegence helped. There was also a discussion of whether senior aides captured earlier last month might be the source of the information on Imus, I think.
A quick glance at Fox News shows he is described as a "Palestinian" so it looks as if the usual confusion that passes for news is still going strong.

 
At 3:39 PM, Blogger Cutler said...

For a discussion of Zarqawi as the ideological "mirror image" of Washington's Neocons/Right Zionists, see my recent post HERE

 
At 3:48 PM, Blogger fahrender said...

just a long overdue thanks to you, professor, for you much needed knowledge and expertise in helping us understand iraq and many other aspects of arab/middle eastern politics and culture.

 
At 4:02 PM, Blogger Marsha said...

So you're suggesting that perhaps someone "dropped a dime" on Al-Zarqawi's location - which is what made the air strike possible?

 
At 4:33 PM, Blogger Dr Victorino de la Vega said...

Striking resemblance with Latin America’s most “subversive” revolutionary Ernesto “Che” Guevara…
Pervasiveness of the proverbial Semitic-Arabian-Iberian “ethnic traits” threatening the integrity of our beloved Western civilization?
Common use of the advanced mortuary toileting techniques in vogue at the CIA?

Allah and Huntington only know…

 
At 4:47 PM, Blogger Evelyn said...

Back in March 2004: Iraq militants claim al-Zarqawi is dead. Which report are we meant to believe?

 
At 4:51 PM, Blogger cc said...

The lead sentence is inaccurate -- all news reports say he was killed by an air raid, not in gunfire as Juan's blog says. Also there is inconsistency about Zarqawi's association with Al-Qaeda: an article in the Syndey newspaper says he swore allegience to Osama Bin Laden in 1989, whereas Juan's blog indicates that Al-Qaeda was merely an opportune self-designation for Zarqawi.

 
At 4:54 PM, Blogger Zac said...

This is a 4 point play (basketball) in a game where we are down by 28.

 
At 5:15 PM, Blogger Evelyn said...

Kurt Nimmo, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi Dead Again

 
At 5:16 PM, Blogger son_of_babylon said...

Dear Professor Cole:

do you have any comments as to why the americans didnt try to take zarqawi alive? based, on news reports, they had the place surrounded by special-ops. wouldnt it have been far more humiliating to have that terrorist alive and in chains?

son of babylon

 
At 5:31 PM, Blogger Eric Jergensen said...

With that kind of emnity between Zarqawi and other resistance factions, it makes me wonder if one of those factions got even by turning him in to the occupation forces.

 
At 6:40 PM, Blogger GD said...

Needless to say I broadly concurr with your analysis on the importance of al-Zarqawi.

However what I found deeply disturbing with his death is that as with the president Saddam Hussein capture (which is even worse) journalists present at the press conference actually applauded and cheered. And then they turn around and talk of their innocence being ex-partes, etc... Say what ?

I take note that innocent iraqis were once again killed by the so-called smart bombs.

Anyway to be clear the boogeyman is dead. Good-riddance. Could it be they need to create an Iranian boogeyman now ?

 
At 8:09 PM, Blogger buermann said...

"Official US spokesmen have all along over-estimated his importance."

I don't think that description quite does justice to the WaPo report from last April:

"The documents state that the U.S. campaign aims to turn Iraqis against Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a Jordanian, by playing on their perceived dislike of foreigners. U.S. authorities claim some success with that effort, noting that some tribal Iraqi insurgents have attacked Zarqawi loyalists.

"For the past two years, U.S. military leaders have been using Iraqi media and other outlets in Baghdad to publicize Zarqawi's role in the insurgency. The documents explicitly list the "U.S. Home Audience" as one of the targets of a broader propaganda campaign.
"

He was a prop.

 
At 9:31 PM, Blogger beervolcano said...

If we didn't invent Zarqawi, we would have to.

He has fulfilled his role. Now we are done with him. Will Osama be caught this October or October 2008?

Something tells me 2008. It would be the perfect ending to the most disastrous time since WWII. Starts with 9/11 right after taking office. Ends with "catching" OBL, the evil perpetrator.

 
At 12:09 AM, Blogger Dr. Rudy Kastner said...

It's a good think that after 3+ years the public finally got 'definitive proof' that Zarqawi actually did exist. There he was on video several months ago showing the world how evil and dangerous he was. While watching this video of him shooting a gun and using bad words it was obvious the Bush Administration's characterization was right on....this guy was super-duper dangerous. Then 'BOOM'!!! Victory!!! Proof of his death was provided right away in the form of a nice portrait of his face. Thankfully his face held up well after being blasted by two precision guided 500 pound bombs. Needless to say the face in that portriat was obviously Zarqawi! Then after some reassuring words from our fearless warrior President....all was right with the world.

The Zarqawi show ends today! Move along citizens...nothing more to see here. What's next on the agenda? 'Massive stockpiles of WMD finely found in Baghdad!'....'insurgency is finally in its last throes!'....'authentic Niger/Iran docs!'......'Iran is in fact encouraging massive illegal immigration from Mexico into the US'...... and 'Leo Strauss' belief in the virtuous 'noble lie' was actually a lie!'

Is it wrong to be this cynical about any 'heroic' accomplishments this Administration lays claim too? Absolutely not!

Let's not forget Ron Suskind's encounter with a White House aide as reported in the New York Times in 2004:

"The aide said that guys like me were ''in what we call the reality-based community,'' which he defined as people who ''believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.'' I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,'' he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."

 
At 12:31 AM, Blogger Pedro said...

Both BBC and the Guardian report that a child (BBC) / young person (Guardian) was killed along with Zarqawi. In your post you only mention 7 aides. I think someone (the press?) is trying to "embelish" the report of Zarqawi's death. I think it would be worthwile to try to find out the truth.

Because if true, I ask: was it "worthwile"? Is the murder of a child ever "worthwhile"?... Why use bombs instead of trying to arrest him like the US troops did with Saddam? Why is it that the military (not just US) just don't care about dead children?...

 
At 5:15 AM, Blogger Voice of Blue Light said...

Dear Juan: Thank you for all you do!!
A question..don't you find it remarkable how well Mr. Zarqawi's corpse survived the two 500 lb bombs that were dropped on his house?
Is he some sort of saint whose corpse will remain undefiled?
Or what lies do you think we are being told now?
It is so fortunate that the American press has had something else to focus on than the atrocities committed by US troops.
Judgement day is going to be a busy one for all of these murderers!

 
At 5:38 AM, Blogger Abhinav Aima said...

The Killing of Zarqawi, in my opinion, might very well slow down the bombings against Iraqi Shiite and therefore bring the country back from the edge of civil war... But this will NOT stop the insurgency against the foreign troops, which is waged by Iraqi Sunni groups who form over 90% of the insurgents...

In fact, the killing of Zarqawi might very well make it easier for Shiite militia to join hands with the Sunni insurgents in order to oust the foreign troops, as has been demanded by Shite leader Muqtada al-Sadr, but rejected by the larger Shiite group SCIRI and its Al-Badr Brigades...

And to respond to Pedro - Are you sure the child was not a terrorist? Because, you know, these people are born that way...

Humour me.

 
At 5:56 AM, Blogger Jolly Roger said...

Zarqawi has a historical counterpart here in America.

"Quantrill's Raiders" were indiscriminate murderers, and their raids ultimately inflamed the locals to act against them. Ultimately, though, they meant absolutely nothing strategically. Nor will the wiping of Zarqawi, although it is good that he will no longer be able to just kill, kill, kill.

 
At 7:46 AM, Blogger mechmorph said...

A week ago, al-Zarqawi was the biggest, baddest threat to the United States in Iraq, according to all the media. Today, his importance has been exaggerated, supposedly. By whom? Now you're telling us that he wasn't even really al-Qaida, even though he was appointed by bin Laden. One gets the sense that the reality is liberals can't bear to give the Bush administration credit for anything positive.

 
At 7:58 AM, Blogger Giordano said...

The Z killing:
either
1)A distraction, from something else. Soon?
Or:
2)
The USA believes that we believe their story that Z was important. And therefore the USA believes that we will be tremendously impressed.

If W's ratings fail to rise, then either 1) or USA is delusional about its own propoganda.

 
At 9:31 AM, Blogger Q said...

Overture from Iran.

I'm seeing more and more signs that Iran was behind this outing, and the other 17 raids that occurred lately. Fits right in as a "confidence building measure" normally preceding negotiations.

Also makes sense that Rumsfeld wasn't exactly "jumping for joy" at this news. This may mean a defeat for the Iran-war hawks.

I'm not sure Zarqawi was ever on Iran's payroll. But it's hard not to believe Iranian intelligence didn't keep tabs on him after his numerous travels through Iran.

In addition, his anti-Sheite rhetoric had become a liability in the past year or so.

Perhaps Iran just "cleaned up" again...

 
At 4:24 PM, Blogger Rick said...

I have to agree with Dr Kastner, for years Zarqawi made tapes that never showed his face. Then a week before his death, we see a video that shows his face, we drop two 500 lb bombs on a house and his corpse (which is now identifiable) is somehow spared for display to the world.
It's no wonder there are so many conspiracy theories out there, there are way too many holes in the story.

 
At 6:58 PM, Blogger HARRY said...

Ask the people he beheaded if he was real or a plant or a figment of our imagination. It must be a sad life to be a liberal.

 
At 4:46 PM, Blogger Rick said...

Yes, it is so hard to be a liberal. Always questioning, always thinking. It must be so easy to be a conservative where every thing is black and white and someone is always there to tell you which it is. It must be such an easy life, never to have to think for yourself.
PS Harry, since i don't talk to ghosts, maybe you could ask those that were beheaded yourself if it was really Zarqawi?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home