Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Friday, July 21, 2006

Israelis Bomb Beirut, Baalbak Again
Tank Incursion in South
Massive Displacements, Humanitarian Crisis



"Israel's disproportionate use of force and collective punishment must stop."
- UN Secretary General Kofi Annan


[Red herring alert:Someone on the Web is questioning this quote or complaining that I didn't mention that Kofi also condemned Hizbullah. Oh for heaven's sakes. I used the quote as an epigraph. It is perfectly accurately quoted. If I had been doing a report on Annan, I would have quoted the whole passage. Using one of his phrases for an epigraph is perfectly legitimate. The quote is here.

The Daily Star reports,

' As The Daily Star went to press [Thursday night], three Israeli bombs fell on the southern suburbs of the capital and additional ordnance hit the northern city of Baalbek, leaving both areas ablaze. No casualty count was available.'


It also reports:

' Israel has opened a 60-kilometer front along the southern Lebanese border, from Naqoura to Majidiyeh, a Lebanese security source said on Thursday. "This front is to estimate Hizbullah's retaliation strength on the ground," the source said. "The fighting zone is inside Lebanese territory, which the UN itself has marked and which Israel agrees is Lebanese." Although up to now Israel has only hinted that it might undertake a full-scale invasion of Lebanon, on Thursday its tanks in fact attempted to cross the UN-demarcated Blue Line. According to a Hizbullah statement, Israeli troops met "fierce resistance from Hizbullah fighters as the Israelis crossed into Lebanon." An Israeli Army spokesperson said his troops were looking for "tunnels and weapons for the second day." '



South Beirut courtesy Daily Star

The tenement buildings of poor, Shiite, south Beirut lie in ruins, with hundreds of thousands of the poor made homeless as they fled relentless Israeli bombing of civilian neighborhoods. The Daily Star says:

' Dozens of buildings were demolished in Haret Hreik and Bir al-Abed in the southern suburbs, where 200,000 people formerly resided. In the midst of the rubble, a few residents dared to come back to their former homes and search for possessions to salvage. '


Hizbullah is the main political party in south Beirut and so of course had political offices there, which the Israelis have bombed. But they did so in complete disregard for civilian life, and what they bombed were not necessarily military targets. There is a difference between the Hizbullah paramilitary of some 5,000 fighters and the political party and its social service institutions-- which include hospitals, clinics and soup kitchens. Or did.

Meanwhile, Shiites of South Lebanon fled Israeli bombing of their villages, coming up north to Beirut, which lacks capacity to deal with these refugees.

The Associated Press reports:

As the death toll rose to 330 in Lebanon, as well as at least 32 Israelis, Lebanese streamed north into the capital and other regions, crowding into schools, relatives' homes or hotels. Taxi drivers in the south were charging up to $400 US a person for rides to Beirut - more than 40 times the usual price. In remote villages of the south, cut off by Isaraeli air strikes, residents made their way out over the mountains by foot. The price of food, medical supplies and gasoline rose by as much as 500 per cent in parts of Lebanon on Thursday as Israel's relentless bombardment destroyed roads, bridges and other supply routes. The World Food Program said estimates of basic food supplies ranged from one to three months. '


Not satisfied to have made 500,000 out of 3.8 million Lebanese homeless already, and to have chased over 100,000 out of their own country to Syria, AP says that on Thursday ' Israel warned hundreds of thousands of people to flee southern Lebanon "immediately . . ." '

The Orwellian world into which Olmert and his band of manic bombers have plunged ordinary Lebanese is illustrated by Liz Sly's report for the Trib:

' Thousands of Lebanese were trying to flee the south after Israeli warplanes dropped leaflets warning people to leave, stirring fears that an Israeli ground invasion was imminent. But hundreds of thousands more remain stranded in villages and towns across the south, unable to leave their homes because of the intensity of the sustained Israeli bombing campaign. United Nations and Lebanese officials warned of an impending humanitarian disaster unless food and medical supplies are allowed to reach the stricken area and called on Israel to establish a "humanitarian corridor" to allow aid to get through. '


So let's get this straight. The Israelis warn the small town Shiites of the south to flee their own homes and go hundreds of miles away (and live on what? in what?). But then they intensely bombing them, making it impossible for them to flee. The Lebanese have awoken to find themselves cockroaches.

I repeat, this is nothing less than an ethnic cleansing of the Shiites of southern Lebanon, an assault on an entire civilian population's way of life. Aside from ecology, it is no different from what Saddam Hussein did to the Marsh Arabs of southern Iraq, and the Israelis are doing it for exactly the same sorts of reasons that Saddam did.

The economy of downtown Beirut has been murdered by the Israelis.

An acquaintance passed this on;

' I've just heard from Christine . . . via text messaging . She is in the Bekaa valley in a bomb shelter and Israel is bombing the village where she is at the moment. She says they are bombing the Red Cross, food lorries, fire brigade, hospitals and emergency relief centres . . . She is very concerned about the lack of reporting by the international media about the details of this violence. '


As for Israel, Haaretz reports:

' There was a significant drop in the number of rockets launched against northern Israel, with an estimated 35-40 rockets hitting empty fields in the Galilee. IDF sources were hard pressed to explain the reason for the drop . . .

The air force carried out more than 150 sorties throughout Lebanon yesterday. Six launchers were destroyed and 16 Hezbollah bases as well as three arms storage facilities were bombed. The air assault destroyed 21 Hezbollah vehicles and included attacks on 100 bridges and roads throughout Lebanon.

In the upcoming days, the IDF plans to expand ground operations in southern Lebanon. Next week, more units will be moved to the North, which will enable broader operations against villages throughout the south. '


I don't think it is nice to carry out massive military "operations" against "villages." I am sure they meant to say "Hizbullah bases" or "missile emplacements." Or maybe they really do just mean "villages."

Professor Rashid Khalidi, Edward Said Professor of Arab Studies at Columbia University on the Lebanon crisis.

University of Akron geography professor Ghazi Falah is being detained by Israeli authorities without charges. This is outrageous.

Ghazieh Lebanon Blog.

Here is an individual effort to bring Israeli officials up on charges for war crimes in Lebanon.

More horrible, horrible pictures of the Israeli carnage against Lebanese civilians. I advise you not to click, but if you do, you are on your own.

USG summaries of Iraqi press for July 19:

' Al-Adalah publishes on page 2 a 400-word text of a statement by Abd-al-Aziz al-Hakim demanding the Iraqi government to cooperate with Arab and Muslim countries to stop the Israeli attacks against Lebanon. . .

Al-Bayyinah carries on page 1 a 250-word report citing Unified Iraqi Coalition member Baha al-A'raji [aide to Muqtada al-Sadr] commenting on the Israeli attacks against Lebanon, and criticizing the Arab League for failing to support the Arab people. . .

26 Comments:

At 4:58 AM, Blogger Abhinav Aima said...

The Guardian reports that Palestinian refugees in Lebanon are still stuck in their refugee camps in South Lebanon (near Tyre and Sidon) and also in southern Beirut areas (Sabra, Shatila, Bourj el Barajneh - which was hit by 23 tons of bombs on Wednesday)... According to The Guardian, Palestinians are very supportive of Hizbollah under these bombardments...

If Israel invades Lebanon all the way up to the Litani, I suspect that Palestinian militias will storm out of their camps and join up with Hizbollah... Is Israel prepared to bomb Palestinian refugee camps and give us another Sabra and Shatila?

 
At 7:46 AM, Blogger AlsoBobFromCT said...

I'd like to suggest that there is a legal case for the United States being made to pay for repairs to Lebanon's infrastructure. We provided the immature Israeli state with the aerial weaponry which they have used for malicious destruction, and we bear huge responsibility. I would like to see the foreign aid money we give to Israel diverted to Lebanon for the purpose of rebuilding.

 
At 10:03 AM, Blogger John Francis Lee said...

AlsoBobFromCT is right on!

Thanks for keeping the news coming Juan Cole. We'd never hear of any of this if we had to rely on the MSM.

 
At 10:09 AM, Blogger John Francis Lee said...

Abihinav Aima:
Is Israel prepared to bomb Palestinian refugee camps and give us another Sabra and Shatila?

Lebanon is George Bush's Sabra and Shatila. Just as Ariel Sharon opened the gates and looked the other way, so too George Bush has given the lunatic Israelis the "green light" for their destruction of the Lebanese government and the Lebanese nation.

I don't pay much attention to the Bush gossip, but I wonder now if he is drunk again? How else could this madness have taken place?

Drunk or sober he is a liar, a murderer, and a war criminal. He will be tried. He can run but he cannot hide.

 
At 10:38 AM, Blogger JNP said...

How our beloved earth can soak up so much blood and still put forth beautiful things each spring is something I do not understand.

Those pictures are awful.

 
At 10:39 AM, Blogger John Koch said...

Ethical objections to Israeli or Hezbollah actions seem a bit quixotic. The US Congress (including most Dems) have given total support to Israel. Arab American or Muslim Amverican voters have little importance in any districs. Even Lousisiana's Rep. Charles Boustany, a Lebanese American, voted in favor of Thursday's "support Israel" resolution. Pro-Israel voters are the only element of the electorate with with any views or attention to the subject. The rest either doen't care, have no clue, don't vote, or accept the story that pre-emptive bombing of any Arab habitation fits into the GWOT. After all, in 1945 the US fire bombed Tokyo and nuked two other cities in reprisal for a 1941 sinking of some military ships ad a remote Pacific base. Victory and revenge have little to do with parity or mercy.

If J. Goldberg's 2002 New Yorker articles on Hezbollah have any truth, most of S. Lebanon is replete with Hezbollah sympathizers. Any constabulary or pinpoint military interdiction of kidnappers or missile shooters is probably impossible.

The only issue of any decisive weight in the US is whether Israel's actions improve or worsen security. Is there any difference between now and the 1982 invasion of S. Lebanon? What was the net cost and benefit balance of that episode? Will a more limited incursion (bombing but only brief IDF troop presence) yield anything better? Will a UN buffer zone have any means to disarm or neutralize Hezbollah activity?

 
At 10:42 AM, Blogger Frebnedzo said...

Re :
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/2C488CEB-4576-4AA8-9178-83DF2D381FDA.htm

 
At 10:52 AM, Blogger Frebnedzo said...

re : 'ethnic cleansing' of Southern Lebanon. Lets say that the civilian population does move North. Lets say there is a ground war in Southern Lebanon between Israel and Hizballah. Such a ground war will have all the hallmarks of a Geneva Convention style "army-vs-army" war.

For Israel, this is a better situation as it using its HW superiority unconstrained by the bad PR of "too large / too fast" a civilian death toll (which will drive Israel to put a stop to its offensive with its objectives unclearly met, as with Qam(?) in Grapes of Wrath.

Hizballah has a fairly good hand in this scenario, as they are fighting a defensive war on familiar terrain. However, it is improved if the civilians stay and they can fight a guerilla war (legitimized as "resistance to occupation") where the Geneva Conventions against differentiating yourself from civilians (via uniforms, flags, etc) do not seem to apply.

Meanwhile, an okay interview with Indyck in Al-Jazeera.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/2C488CEB-4576-4AA8-9178-83DF2D381FDA.htm

 
At 1:58 PM, Blogger Eric said...

Concerning the effort to indict Israeli perpetrators of war crimes before the ICC:

Unfortunately, neither Israel nor Lebanon have ratified the Rome Statute, and at least one of the two would be required for the ICC's Prosecutor to take jurisdiction over actions in Lebanon.

(Israel signed but has not ratified...and if it keeps planning operations like this, it doesn't seem likely to do so in the near future.)

 
At 2:05 PM, Blogger MJS said...

On all sides the people suffer.

Thank you Prof. Cole for the good work that you perform.

+++

 
At 2:28 PM, Blogger InplainviewMonitor said...

Newt Gingrich on WW3

Slightly parahprasing Woody Allen, political revolution is like a shark: to live, it must move, otherwise, it suffocates and dies. This is exacly what happens now to the neoconservative global "democratic" revolution. In order to live, it must move forward whatever it takes, otherwise, it is all over. So, politically, now the GOP has sectarian war in Iraq on its hands. In addition, war in Lebanon is on the edge of full scale Israeli ground invasion, and it is quite clear that air attacks won't be enough. Internally, the GOP must take care of the midterm elections in November. It is very likely that, as usual, this will be done on the militarist basis.

Now it appears that recent neoconservative diplomatic offensive was fairly effective. According to Jim Lobe, autocratic Sunni rulers did exactly what the neocons expected from them - criticized Hizballah and Iran for the current situation in Lebanon. Competent observers starting from the Arabnews know the fatal consequences of this position: internal alienation between pro-Western Arab elites and fiercely anti-Israel masses, further antagonism between Sunnis and Shiites including Iraq, more support for Israeli offensive in Lebanon from G8 and UN - and further weakening of these international bodies because of their apparent impotence.

With all this in mind, recent text by Newt Gingrich on the coming WW3 is perfectly understandable. It would be terribly naive to expect him saying anything concrete about the ME situation, his job is to produce triumphalist neoconservative rhetoric with certain semantic variations. Now the shift is, we don't hear anything about winning GWOT, GSAVE or bringing "democracy" to the ME, WW3 and "crisis of civilization" is supposed to replace all these labels. One can also take Newt's WW3 as the latest version of his "contract with America". Another important fact about this text is the place where it is published. What matters is that it is not FrontPage Magazine where rants of this sort belong, but GU from all other places! This certainly means their support of the neoconservative course and their further shift to the far-right.

Behind the scenes, the neocons are not a single bit as stupid and delusional as their opponents may like to think. Under close examination, their ideological language is fairly sophisticated and perfectly capable to express changes in situation on the ground. Exactly like with their arch-foes Khomeinists and Sunni radicals, interpreting the neoconservative texts is a challenging and exciting job. Those who fail and think they are too smart for this stupid junk, have only themselves to blame for their misery.

 
At 3:52 PM, Blogger Frank Staheli said...

It's interesting to observe the two political camps: One looks at Israel and says they have no right to bomb southern Lebanon, and the other says that if Lebanon would get rid of a pack of bloodthirsty terrorists from their midst, then Israel wouldn't be forced to defend themselves all the time.

I subscribe to the views of the second camp, and so far, I have not seen anything that convinces me otherwise. Israel is perfectly justified to root out Hizballah (more aptly would they be named Hizbshaitan) from southern Lebanon, especially after granting the gigantic concession of the Gaza, which has done nothing more than give the Hizballah terrorists another lie to tell and a closer base of operations from which to attack, murder, and kidnap Palestinian Israelis.

It is extremely sad that the everyday Lebanese are caught in the middle of the fighting, but I cannot understand how anyone could put the blame for that on anyone except the Hizballah terrorists.

If I am missing something, please educate me.

 
At 4:00 PM, Blogger Arizoniana said...

While the rest of the world is preoccupied with an Israeli invasion of Lebanon, do you think anyone would notice if Turkey invaded Iraq? From the Radio Free Europe website:

>>Turkey has said it was taking steps this week to prepare for a cross-border incursion into northern Iraq to hunt down Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) fighters holed up in the Qandil Mountain range. The announcement came following a series of PKK attacks on Turkish troops in recent days that left more than a dozen soldiers dead.

The Turkish General Staff was asked to plan and prepare for a possible cross-border operation following antiterrorism board and ministerial council meetings earlier this week. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan confirmed on July 19 that preparations are under way, telling reporters in Ankara: "Authorized institutions and security forces are proceeding with their work. Whatever step needs to be taken will be taken according to the study."

Turkey has tried on several occasions in recent months to pressure the U.S. and Iraqi governments to take action against the PKK. The latest attempt appears to be based on an assumption that the U.S. position regarding cross-border operations has changed.

The United States maintains that any Turkish military operation could destabilize Iraqi Kurdistan. U.S. Ambassador to Ankara Ross Wilson told Turkey's NTV television on July 17 that the United States would oppose any unilateral action on Turkey's part.<<

 
At 4:52 PM, Blogger johnMccutchen said...

Bush Sees Mideast Strife as Step to Peace

 
At 8:32 PM, Blogger Tom Griffin said...

I thought I saw a report somewhere that Saddam Hussein had criticised Hezbollah.
Has anyone else seen this or got a reference for it?
It was an interesting sign of the pendulum swinging back to Sunnis good, Shi'ites bad, almost like the Orwellian Eastasia and Eurasia.
We're supposed to have forgotten that Saddam Hussein was once the frontline of Saudi/Western efforts to contain Shi'ite Iran.

 
At 10:30 PM, Blogger spaghetti happens said...

I fear that Americans, as a whole, will not change, will not give up our ways of isolation and genuflecting to the mindlessness of our entertainment culture until we have carnage like this in our own streets.

This is Rumsfeld's "flypaper theory", Phase 2, wherein it's the Israelis who are "fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here." If you missed Phase 1, just check the body counts in Iraq and consider how many of the dead are noncombatants.

If this is any indication of the monstrousness of the crimes that await us in the 21st Century, it's going to be a long, hard ride.

 
At 11:40 PM, Blogger John Francis Lee said...

Frank Staheli

'...especially after granting the gigantic concession of the Gaza...

It is extremely sad that the everyday Lebanese are caught in the middle of the fighting, but I cannot understand how anyone could put the blame for that on anyone except the Hizballah terrorists.

If you think Gaza is anything other than an Israeli Concentration Camp for the Palestinians you are ineducable, Frank.

It is more than "extremely sad" that innocent Lebanese are being slaughtered and their nation destroyed by the Israelis, it is state-sponsored terrorism and an unambiguous war crime.

Hizballah captured two Israeli soldiers to use in a prisoner swap to free those of its own held by Israel, as did the Palestinians in Gaza. Hizballah is not the state bombing innocents and destroying the state of Lebanon, Israel is, while the neocon government of the USofA looks on approvingly.

The neocon Republicrats have unambiguously crossed the line. Nothing will hold them back now, certainly not their evil twins, the "made men and women" of the Demoplican party.

It looks like a journey of horror and degradation for both the US and Israel on their way to their ultimate defeat. The Nazis fell, the Stalinists fell, and the US/Israeli/UK Axis of Evil will fall too. But it looks like they will murder as many as they can, break and burn as much as they can on their way down.

Make no mistake. This is our government. We are allowing this to happen. We are all war criminals now.

 
At 12:53 AM, Blogger Blue Photon said...

If I am missing something, please educate me

Why don’t you start by trying to comprehend what Professor Cole has been saying about the current situation in the Middle East? Reread his blogs for the last several weeks, and he explains very clearly why the situation is not as simplistic as you perceive it.

'...especially after granting the gigantic concession of the Gaza...

Concession? International law states that occupied territory can not be annexed by the conquering nation. Israel isn’t granting a “concession”. It is only doing what international law requires it to do.

 
At 3:54 AM, Blogger RHR said...

I believe that it is actually Cole here who is simplifying the situation by claiming that Israel is essentially slaughtering innicent civilians in Lebanon without any attempt at sparing civilian life. That is a blatantly misleading representation. It is very easy for us here thousands of miles away to say that Israel should not kill innocent civilians. That is a statement that we can make because we are not everyday needing to worry that some extremists across a border are constantly firing missiles and sending people into towns to detonate explosives in coffee shops. These people doing this integrate themselves into villages and communities, precisely so that Israel will have this problem, that if you go after the perpetrators, they will have to take some civilians with them. Therefore, it is not the Israelis that show disregard for human life, but rather the terrorists, and Hizbollah and the various Palestinian groups are prime examples of this.

Israel is not weakening Lebanon either, and this was never the plan. Most Lebanese do not want an armed Hizbollah. But the current government is too tied down by Hizbollah's ministers to take any action to disarm them. We can all agree that the only armed force in any democratic institution should be the government. Lebanon has failed at this because of the governments weakness, and there are many Lebanese who are praying that Israel is able to deliver a fatal blow to the militants, so that the Lebanese Army may enter the area, and assure security for citizens of both Israel and Lebanon.

 
At 11:05 AM, Blogger BadTux said...

If I am missing something, please educate me?

Okay. Here's the deal. Lebanon is a small country. They have no army worth the name, just a small border patrol armed with light weapons capable of taking on drug smugglers and not much else. They have no air force, just a few lightly-armed choppers for taking on said drug smugglers. They have no navy, just a few coast guard cutters (again for dealing with said smugglers). The Lebanese government hasn't fired a shot in anger against anybody since the end of their civil war in, what was it, 1991? Which is when their "armed forces" were basically re-formed as a small lightly armed police force with very little ability to take on anything larger than a few smugglers. This was done on purpose, BTW -- in the civil war, the military was used against fellow Lebanese until it disintegrated, so having a large military, as far as the Lebanese are concerned, is just asking for renewed oppression of the Lebanese people by whoever happens to currently hold the reins of the military.

Now, a small gang of armed criminals in the south of Lebanon kidnaps a couple of Israeli soldiers who were either inside Lebanon or damned close to the border. The Lebanese government doesn't have sufficient military power to take on this small gang (maybe 500 full-time fighters, but well armed by Syria and Iran). Let's see what the correct response is for the nation that has the second most-powerful military on the planet (behind the United States -- China and Russia may have more soldiers, but they don't have Israel's military technology):

a) Send in some Special Forces troops with air support, find the bastards who kidnapped your troops, and kill them.

OR:

b) Bomb civilian towns and neighborhoods into rubble, kill hundreds if not thousands of innocent civilians, destroy the commercial center of the Jordan-Syria-Lebanon triad (the port and airport of Beirut), and announce that this is all self defense because the government of Lebanon lacked the ability to take on large gangs of armed criminals due to lack of a military.

I'm sorry, but when does lack of a military justify bombing civilian hospitals (yes, at least one hospital has been bombed, I saw the pictures), civilian apartment buildings, airports, and sea ports?

Sure, sending in your troops to clean out the criminals is plenty justified, and I don't think anybody here would have a problem with that. If they'd just bombed the south of Lebanon in order to get the civilian population to flee so they could move in and finish off Hezbollah, I doubt anybody here would have a problem with that either, except for the most rabid Jew-haters for whom Israel can never do anything that isn't evil. But bombing the most peaceful city in the Middle East (Beirut) because they are TOO PEACEFUL, that is just sick, sick, sick. I'm sorry, it just can't be justified, period.

But hey, [sarcasm on] I suppose believing in peace is a crime in today's world, so it's perfectly justifiable to kill anybody who believes in peace. [/sarcasm off]

- BT

 
At 1:48 PM, Blogger Frank Staheli said...

Thank you RHR for your reasoned analysis. I think Mr. Cole does an excellent job of this as well. Some of his readers, however... ;-)

To John Francis Lee, you would do well to understand RHR's comments that Israel is not destroying Lebanon, and that "there are many Lebanese who are praying that Israel is able to deliver a fatal blow to the militants."

Of course Israel cannot be held to be perfectly moral in this fight as I have touched on in a recent post on Serving Iraq. But at least they are trying to minimize casualties, while the Hizballah, al Qaeda, and other terrorists couldn't care less about what casualties they inflict.

 
At 9:41 PM, Blogger John Francis Lee said...

Hi Frank,

Is RHR yourself under a different name? I should take him as an "authority" on this situation?

His analysis is "the devil made the Israelis do it". That one never got past Sister Aloyisius in kindergarten.

I'll refer you to BadTax. Or to Paul Craig Roberts

 
At 12:09 AM, Blogger Blue Photon said...

I believe that it is actually Cole here who is simplifying the situation by claiming that Israel is essentially slaughtering innicent civilians in Lebanon without any attempt at sparing civilian life.

Can you please give an example as to where Israel has tried to minimize civilian causalities in this conflict? By targeting hospitals, bridges, power stations, etc., the main objective of this military campaign is to punish Lebanese civilians.

we are not everyday needing to worry that some extremists across a border are constantly firing missiles

I agree with you 100% here. The Israelis deserve the right to live in peace; but the Palestinians and the Lebanese also deserve that same right as well. The Palestinians should be able to live and not worry about being executed without trial (i.e. targeted killings). Now, how do the Israelis know they are killing “terrorists” if they those people have never been charged in a court of law? Palestinians should be able to enjoy an afternoon at the beach without worrying about being blown to bits.

there are many Lebanese who are praying that Israel is able to deliver a fatal blow to the militants,

Again, please explain how targeting a hospital is delivering a blow to the militants?

But at least they [Israelis] are trying to minimize casualties,

Same question goes to the other poster as well. Please provide an example where Israel has tried to minimize civilian causalities. Your argument would be stronger if you would back up your statements with proof.

 
At 2:22 PM, Blogger cristo said...

The lebanese are ok with killers and thugs sending rockets into Israel but when Israel responds they cry and whine. Get Hezbollah out of the civilian areas or else expect Isreal to retaliate and you wont get much world sympathy.

 
At 6:08 PM, Blogger GAYEKOKIN said...

THE REAL BLAME FALLS ON ANNAN AND THE UN FOR NOT ENFORCING THE INTERNATIONAL BORDER WHEN ISRAEL LEFT LEBANON. FOR SIX YEARS A LEBANESE GANG OF THUGS FORMED AND WERE ARMED BY 2 ROGUE NATIONS AND THEREBY BECAME A STATE WITHIN A STATE. THE LEBANON GOVERNMENT DID NOT ASK FOR HELP AGAINST THSE THUGS NOR DID IT COMPLAIN THAT IT HAD BEEN TAKEN OVER. NOW THAT WAR HAS BROKEN OUT--SUDDENLY ALL THE BLAME IS PUT ON ISRAEL. JUAN COLE HAS BITTER HATRED AGAINST ISRAEL THEREFORE HIS WRITINGS MUST BE SEEN IN THAT CONTEXT. HE IS NOT- AND NEVER WAS- TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY BUT WITH A DASH OF QUININE. IT IS NOT SURPRISING THAT
WHENEVER ISRAEL IS UNDER ATTACK THESE SAME COCK-ROACHES COME OUT OF THEIR HOLES TO ADD THEIR CHIRPING AND WHINING. I AM WILLING TO PLACE A WAGER THAT MOST OF THESE VERMIN HAVE NEVER MET OR WOULD RECOGNIZE AN ISRAELI IF THEY BUMPED INTO ONE.

 
At 8:38 PM, Blogger fistofury said...

I have been quite literally sickened by the way in which Israel has reacted to this situation. The gratuitous actions of the Israeli military is a prime example of how to create utter hatred. I am completely distraught over the fact that nearly 500 Lebanese innocent civilians have fallen victim to such needless atrocities. I am aware of Hezbollah's irrational actions, however the recurring conduct of fighting fire with fire has already proved itself as lethal tediousness. With Israeli air-attacks on trucks carrying medical and food supplies all for the sake of 2 captured Israeli soldiers it is difficult to detect any sense of proportionality. I have no friends which can relate to this question other than in a purely objective fashion, as I do therefore I possess no bias. However, as a person strongly-opposed to any form of war, the reaction of even a moderate would worry me as even I have felt strong feelings of hatred towards the Israeli government for the way it has conducted itself. No wonder there are militants amongst us when such a lack of justice is emphasised.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home