Israelis Kill UN Peacekeepers
Halutz Commits to War Crimes
Israeli Airstrikes Kill Nabatiyeh Family
$150 Million Damage to Factories
Update: Hizbullah fighters defending Bint Jbeil have killed 14 Israeli soldiers, according to early reports on Wednesday. Hizbullah is ratcheting up its kill ratio with the Israeli military toward 1:1, something no other Arab fighting force has even approached.
A Radio interview with me by Barry Gordon.
UN Secretary General Kofi Annan expressed shock at the deliberate targetting of the UN peacekeeping base in Khiam, south Lebanon.
' "This coordinated artillery and aerial attack on a long established and clearly marked U.N. post at Khiam occurred despite personal assurances given to me by (Israeli) Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that U.N. positions would be spared Israeli fire," '
The Israelis denied that they hit the base deliberately, but Kofi would know. Why do it? When you have in mind war crimes, it is better not to have neutral observers in the region.
Philip Gordon relays the thinking of the Israeli political and military elite behind its inhuman and massive bombing of all Lebanon:
' According to retired Israeli army Col. Gal Luft, the goal of the campaign is to "create a rift between the Lebanese population and Hezbollah supporters." The message to Lebanon's elite, he said, is this: "If you want your air conditioning to work and if you want to be able to fly to Paris for shopping, you must pull your head out of the sand and take action toward shutting down Hezbollah-land." '
In other words, Zbig was right that the Israelis have kidnapped the 3.8 million Lebanese and are holding them all for ranson, while breaking their legs from time to time to encourage prompt payment. The horrible thing is that the Lebanese could not do anything about Hizbullah if they wanted to. Their government is weak and divided (Hizbullah is in it, and the Bush administration and Ambassador Mark Feltman signed off on that!) Their new, green army only has 60,000 men, and a lot of them are Shiites who would not fight Hizbullah. Lebanon was a patient that needed to be nurtured carefully to health. Instead, it has been drafted and put into the middle of the worst fighting on the battlefield.
Then there is this: ' Brigadier General Dan Halutz, the Israeli Chief of Staff, emphasised that the offensive . . . was open-ended. “Nothing is safe (in Lebanon), as simple as that,” he said. '
In other words, Halutz, who is also said to have threatened ten for one reprisals, is openly declaring that he will commit war crimes if he wants to. Nothing is safe? A Christian school in the northern village of Bsharri? A Druze old people's home in the Shouf mountains? A Sunni family out for a stroll in the northern port of Tripoli? He can murder all of them at will, Halutz says. And Luft gives us the rationale. If these Lebanese civilians aren't curbing Hizbullah for Israel, they just aren't going to be enjoying their lives. They are a nation of hostages until such time as they have properly developed Stockholm syndrome and begin thanking the Israelis for their tender mercies.
I was in Beirut briefly in mid-June. I went downtown in the evening, where big LCD displays had been set up outside at the cafes, and thousands of people were enjoying the World Cup games. The young Lebanese, in jeans, were dancing to the new pop music of stars like Nancy Ajram and Amal Hijazi. Some had painted their faces with Brazilian flags. They were rooting for Brazil. The shops were full of fashionable clothing and jewelry, the restaurants tastefully decorated, the gourmet Lebanese food tantalizing. The bookstores were full of probing studies and intelligent commentary. The Syrians were gone and there was a lighthearted atmosphere. The snooty nightclubs at places like Monot street were choosy about who could get in.
I went to see publishers about my project, of publishing the works of great American thinkers in Arabic. Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Susan B. Anthony, Martin Luther King. They mentioned about how the US did not have a good reputation and maybe not many readers would be interested. I said, maybe that is changing. Washington supports the new government, after all. We are your well-wishers.
Meanwhile, while Nancy was singing and Brazil was scoring, Halutz and Olmert were putting the final touches on their long-planned bombing campaign. They would go up and hit Tripoli's port, a Sunni area. They would hit the port at Jounieh, the trendy Christian city near Beirut. They would hit Beirut's port and its new shiny airport. They would hit the milk factory, the telecom towers, the roads, the bridges, and some clinics and hospitals for good measure. They would hit the fuel depots. It would be a total war on the Lebanese civilian population, setting 800,000 out of 3.8 million out from their homes or the rubble of their former homes, forcing them to other cities as homeless refugees, or abroad to Syria or Cyprus. They would reduce al-Dahiyah al-Janubiyah, the teeming Shiite slum to the south, to rubble and stray bloody fingers, feet and noses. They would say that these were all military targets, but they lied. Hizbullah is a political party with 14 MPs in parliament. It has political party offices, soup kitchens, clinics, in those Shiite slums. A lot of times it seems to be these that the Israelis hit. They lied and said that missiles were launched from Beirut, when they never were.
Israel's present policy toward Lebanon, of striking at so many civilian targets as to hold the entire civilian population hostage, is unspeakable.
I haven't complained about the Israeli border war with Hizbullah. I'm not sure it is wise, and I don't know how many Israelis Hizbullah even killed in, say, the year 2005. Is it really worth it? But I don't deny that Hizbullah went too far when it shelled dozens of civilian towns and cities and killed over a dozen innocent civilians, even in reprisal for the Israeli bombing campaign. (You can't target civilians. That is a prosecutable crime.) That is a clear casus belli, and I'd like to see Nasrallah tried at the Hague for all those civilian deaths he ordered. The fighting at Maroun al-Ra's and Bint Jbeil was horrible on all sides, but it was understandable, even justifiable. The fighting itself isn't going to lead anywwhere useful, though, and it is time for a ceasefire and political negotiations--the only way to actually settle such disputes.
What was done to Lebanon as a whole is among the most horrible war crimes of the young 21st century. And that it was done tells me that there is something sick in the heart of the Israeli military and political elite, a sickness of the soul that had better be faced and remedied before our entire world catches the contagion.
I mean, who talks like that? "if you want to be able to fly to Paris for shopping, you must pull your head out of the sand and take action toward shutting down Hezbollah-land." . . . “Nothing is safe, as simple as that.” If they are the good guys, why do they talk like James Bond villains?
Yes, yes, Nasrallah and his shock troops are also evil. They are also sick in the soul. We have established that. Halutz can have the 5,000 fighters and the 12,000 rockets to do as he pleases to them. I have been to Haifa, too, and the city means a lot to me. I mind deeply when I hear that the mad bombers around Nasrallah have killed people there and done substantial damage.
But you will note that 800,000 Israelis are not homeless, that the ports are still operating, that Tel Aviv airport is open, that over 400 Israeli civilians aren't dead in two weeks, that factories, roads, bridges, telecom towers are still there. In fact, you will note that no flotilla of international vessels had to come to evacuate tens of thousands of foreigners from Israel. It is suffering, and that is wrong. It is not suffering what Lebanon is.
The Daily Star reports
Israeli airstrikes throughout Lebanon killed 10 civilians and wiped out a family:
' Meanwhile, Israeli attacks on Lebanon claimed the lives of at least 10 civilians . . . Israeli warplanes raided Southern Lebanese towns and pounded the Bekaa and the Chouf areas, and committed a new massacre in the Southern town of Nabatiyeh, where six people from the Hamza family, Saad Hamza and his wife and children, were killed in attack on their home.

Rubble in Nabatiyah Courtesy as-Safir
The article adds,
After two days of relative calm, Beirut's southern suburbs, a Hizbullah stronghold, were once again targeted by Israel in an attack which destroyed 10 buildings . . .
I don't know why the wire services keep saying Monday had been a day of "relative calm" in Beirut. The Israelis bombed it at least twice, once before Condi's visit and once after.
Fighting continued in the far south as Israel continued its land invasion of Lebanon, including at Maroun al-Ra's, a small village the Israelis claimed to have taken days ago. One Israeli soldier was announced dead at Maroun al-Ra's on Tuesday. The Israelis claimed to have "sealed off" the town of Bint Jbeil (ordinary pop. 30,000) but admitted that they were engaging in firefights with its defenders. Hizbullah admitted that the Israeli army had killed 5 of its fighters on Tuesday.
With regard to Bint Jbeil, The Daily Star notes
' Sources in the foreign observer force UNIFIL said it was difficult to know which side controlled which parts of the town and that some civilians were feared trapped by the crossfire. '
Maj. Gen. Gadi Eizenkot played down the idea that there were still civilians in Bint Jbeil, saying that there were only 200 to 400 Hizbullah guerrillas left there.
The total death toll for civilians in Israel's total war on Lebanon has risen to 406, with 20 Lebanese Army soldiers killed and 27 Hizbullah fighters.
The Israelis continued to interfere with humanitarian aid efforts despite their announcements to the contrary, according to the Daily Star:
Israeli warships also forbade a French ship loaded with humanitarian aid from reaching a port in Lebanon, according to media reports.
Israeli gunboats also fired warning shots at a Turkish ferry that was helping evacuate Australians from Lebanon and held it for several hours, Turkish Transport Minister Binali Yildirim said on Tuesday.
Hizbullah fired more than a dozen rockets into Haifa (see next entry).
Nicholas Blanford of the Daily Star reports on the human dimension of Israel's vast displacement of civilians from their homes in South Lebanon:
' TIBNINE: Wearing only slippers on his feet, it took Youssef Beydoun two-and-a-half terrifying hours to walk from his shell-battered village of Kounine to the relative safety of Tibnine. Here the 78-year-old is one of some 1,600 refugees crammed into Tibnine's government-run hospital, all of them having fled from a cluster of Shiite hill villages to the south. With drinking water running out, no milk, no electricity and declining stocks of food as well as little prospect of imminent escape from Tibnine, the refugees are caught in a vortex of confusion, fear, anger and despair.
"All the time there's bombing; all the houses have been hit. It was very bad. I thought my heart would stop," said Beydoun, a slim, stooped man with a white floppy hat shading his stubbly beard and weather-beaten face from the midday sun. He said he left Kounine after his house was flattened by Israeli bombing, killing his Sri Lankan and Ethiopian maids.
"They are still buried under the rubble," he said . . . Bint Jbeil and the surrounding Shiite villages, such as Aitaroun, Kounine, Beit Yahoun and Ainatta have borne the brunt of Israel's air and artillery blitz.
"It's very bad in Kounine," said Souad Shibli, 45, an Egyptian nurse whose Lebanese husband is working in Kuwait. "All night there are explosions. We want cars to go to Beirut. Please tell Kofi Annan we must have cars to get us out," she added, her voice becoming more desperate and shrill. '
The economic impact of the relentless Israeli bombings would be hard to calculate. Some experts are saying that the Israelis have caused at least $150 million in direct damage to factories:
' "The losses are more than $150 million in the current book value and we are afraid the situation will get worse," Jacques Sarraf, a chemical plant owner and the former president of the industrial association, told The Daily Star. More than a dozen factories in the Bekaa valley and other areas were hit by Israeli strikes in two weeks of bombing. Among the factories that were hit and destroyed were the country's largest dairy farm, Liban Lait; a paper mill; a packaging firm and wood plant.
"I just want to know why these factories are being targeted by the Israelis," Sarraf said. "Why Liban Lait, which makes cheese for the United Nations in Lebanon?" Liban Lait, which produces cheese, yogurt and labeneh, controls more than 50 percent of the Lebanese market. Sarraf said that the one of the industries that was flattened by the raids was an Indian investment project.
Many industrialists strongly believe that the ostensible cause of the Israeli bombardment, the abduction of two Israeli soldiers by the militant group Hizbullah, was nothing more than an excuse to destroy the Lebanese economy because the economy poses a challenge to Israel. '
Among the industries worst damaged is the telecom sector.
' Lebanon's mobile networks and satellite antennas are being targeted by Israeli warplanes, causing at least $10 to $15 million in material damage and a drop in the revenues of the telecom sector, Telecommunications Minister Marwan Hamade said on Sunday. . . Israeli warplanes have hit transmitters, relay stations and satellite stations in Beirut, the South, the North and the Bekaa Valley since the war started 12 days ago.
Israeli warplanes bombarded a satellite and antenna station in Kesrouan on Saturday, killing an [Christian] employee of the Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation and destroying the television antenna. '
For essential background:
Jim Quilty in Middle East Report on Israel's war on the Lebanese Shiites.
Helena Cobban, "Hizbullah's New Face."

|
31 Comments:
The Israeli military elite have for years taken the position that "the floggings shall continue until morale improves."
Dr. Cole poses the question, "Who talks like that?" (referring to specific comments, not my quip)
The answer seems to be the Israeli military elite, who take the position that Arabs must be beaten down until they are willing to do the Israeli's work for them.
The problem occurs when Rumsfeld's Law comes into play. Internet Alert. Internet Alert. I am attempting to name a new law.
"You commit atrocities against the terrorists you have created, not the ones you wish you had created."
Who are these Israeli generals who complain about the nature of their enemy? Do they think they, as Israelis, deserve only the most noble (and compliant) foe? Only stupid Goliaths wanted for the position. Desert Foxes need not apply. (It is my own personal suspicion that David had a bit of help from an archer or two hidden in the rocks, but I digress.)
Clearly, this Hizbollah is unacceptable. I think the US should sponsor a UN resolution with clear and unambiguous specifications for terrorist organizations. Harummmmfph!
Moving on, what about young Valerie Flame, oops I meant Plame. Isn't it convenient for Israel, and Michael Ledeen, that this Hizbollah was at least cooperative enough to fire a few missles just in time to throw some smoke into the American public, lest we learn who really was behind the treason known as L'Affaire Plame?
The Israelis denied that they hit the base deliberately, but Kofi would know. Why do it? When you have in mind war crimes, it is better not to have neutral observers in the region.
How many others are reminded of the murderous Israeli attack on the Liberty in 1973?
But what was done to Lebanon as a whole is among the most horrible war crimes of the young 21st century. And that it was done tells me that there is something sick in the heart of the Israeli military and political elite, a sickness of the soul that had better be faced and remdedied before our entire world catches the contagion.
After reading Alan Dershowitz shocking, even for him, screed on the admissability of killing women and children I had a shock of recognition.
Dershowitz and the other American neocons reflexively level the charge of "anti-Semitism" against anyone who dares criticize Israel or AIPAC's American policies toward Israel. I had always just assumed that the reason for this was to put such critics on the same side of that line drawn in the sand as Adolph Hitler and other such monsters.
But I think now that the real reason is not to castigate, to dehumanize, the outgroup, the critics, but to forge or reinforce the bond that keeps the ingroup coherent.
The message is "we, god's chosen, are hated and reviled by everyone on earth, we must fight tooth and claw or we will surely die". From there, the top of the slippery slope, its a ride on gravity's rainbow to the depths of depravity. It quickly becomes "ok" to employ methods against your enemies, which include everyone on earth in the Israeli case, Americans and UN peacekeepers included, that you would not, could not use against peoples of the same "essential" worth as yourselves.
This is not peculiar to the Israelis by any means. The American Xtians, with their irrevocable "go to heaven" cards given to them at their baptisms when they were reborn, in particular and Americans, "god's means on earth of spreading democracy (Hah!) among the benighted masses of humanity outside of the United States in general, have displayed the same fierce ingroup determination to do "what it takes" to the Iraqis and whomever else stands in their way since we've heard the celestial trumpet blow on 9/11.
Getting Lebanon to turn on Hezbollah by bombing the snot out of it will work about as well as bringing down the WTC buildings got New Yorkers to turn on al Qaeda.
That is a clear casus belli, and I'd like to see Nasrallah tried at the Hague for all those civilian deaths he ordered.
Anyone from Israel? It seems patently unfair that the long planning (and outright acknowledgement that everything and everyone in Lebanon is an Israeli target) does not get a similar reaction from the world. But we all know Westerners (and the Israelis are considered that by Americans, yes?) are not tried at the Hague...
I read your blog every day and pass it on - I really appreciate your the news from various sources and your reasoned responses. Thank you, Juan.
You wrote "...that it was done tells me that there is something sick in the heart of the Israeli military and political elite, a sickness of the soul that had better be faced and remedied before our entire world catches the contagion."
Did they catch this sickness from the Washington political and military elite, or did they transmit it to their friends on the Potomac?
Or is the "sickness" the by-product of late capitalist societies that disdain the cultures of people poorer and darker in skin than they?
And that it was done tells me that there is something sick in the heart of the Israeli military and political elite, a sickness of the soul that had better be faced and remedied before our entire world catches the contagion.
Isn't this sickness just racist contempt for Arabs? And we are told that we in the US support Israel because of shared values?
Curious to see what Hezbollah had been up to on the Lebanese border since 2000, I checked the Israeli Foreign Ministry site for civilian casualty figures:
Incidents along Israel's northern border since May 2000:
20 Jul 2004
Chronological list of events along Israel's northern border in which Israeli civilians and/or soldiers were killed since the IDF pullout of Lebanon in May 2000.
In all, 13 Israeli soldiers were killed and 53 wounded; 6 civilians were killed and 14 wounded.
Since May 2000 the following attacks against Israeli targets have taken place:
105 anti-aircraft attacks
42 anti-tank missile attacks
5 Katyusha rocket attacks
7 shooting attacks
10 explosive device attacks
14 infiltration attempts.
The following is a chronological list of events along Israel's northern border in which Israeli civilians and/or soldiers were killed since May 2000:
20 July 2004 - Hizbullah sniper fired at an IDF post in the western sector of the Israeli-Lebanese border. Two IDF soldiers were killed.
7 May 2004 - Fire in the Mt. Dov sector. IDF soldier Dennis Leminov was killed, and two other soldiers were severely wounded. The IDF returned fire.
19 Jan 2004 - An anti-tank missile was fired at IDF D9 while neutralizing explosive charges near Zari’t. An IDF soldier, Yan Rotzenski, was killed and another soldier was severely wounded.
6 Oct 2003 - Staff Sgt. David Solomonov was killed when Hizbullah fired at an IDF force south of the Fatma Gate in the eastern sector. In addition, the Hizbullah fired missiles and rockets at an IDF post in the Reches Ramim area.
10 Aug 2003 - An Anti aircraft fire in the western sector. As a result of the shooting, one civilian was killed, another civilian was moderately wounded and three other civilians were lightly wounded.
29 Aug 2002 - Fire at an IDF post in the Mt. Dov sector. IDF soldier Ofer Misali was killed, and two other soldiers were lightly wounded.
12 Mar 2002 – Infiltration: In a shooting attack on the Shlomi- Metzuba route. Six Israelis civilians were killed, among them IDF officer Lt. German Rojkov.
14 Apr 2001 - Fire at an IDF post in the Mt. Dov sector. IDF soldier Elad Litvak was killed.
16 Feb 2001- Fire at an IDF convoy on Mt. Dov. IDF soldier Elad Shneor was killed, and three other soldiers were wounded.
26 Nov 2000 - A charge was detonated near an IDF convoy. IDF soldier Khalil Taher was killed and two other soldiers were wounded.
7 Oct 2000 - Kidnapping: Three IDF soldiers: Adi Avitan, Omer Soued and Binyamin Avraham were kidnapped by the Hizballah from the Mt. Dov sector.
Interestingly, civilian deaths seem to have resulted from anti-aircraft fire (Hezbollah shooting down Israeli surveillance planes?) and an incident that lists an IDF officer as a civilian.
I found one incident (an aborted kidnapping attempt) in 2005.
The original report regarding the kidnapping that started the current round of hostilities says that Hezbollah also shot rockets into Israel (diversionary fire), wounding three civilians. That claim is not repeated in any later reports of the incident.
Unless I missed something, it seems that Hezbollah was mostly in the kidnapping business/targeting IDF up until now.
I have stated many times that 'peace is a process'. It requires negotiation, compromise, painstaking progress, and quite often a fundamental restructuring of how two countries simply THINK about each other. This process takes time.
The best example I can think of at the moment is the Vietnam War peace talks. Remember how long the warring parties argued over something as simple as the shape of the negotiating table? (Of course, this was proxy battle for the complex argument over the identity and relationship of the negotiating parties, but that only reinforces my point: even what SEEMS simple is often complex, and takes time.)
Yet, as we see, the Rome talks have broken down because of the US demand that everything must be solved all at once.
This is clearly an impossible hurdle. Aside from displaying a horrifying ignorance of the politics of the Middle East, SecState Rice is demanding that the parties - some of whom (Iran and Syria) she won't even allow to attend the negotiating session - agree on a comprehensive peace plan before her boss will rein in Israel.
This strategy is either foolish or stupid - take your pick. Its main result is that the US now stands alone, having alienated all of the other parties at the talks.
Additionally, the US insistence that Iran is controlling Hezbollah is becoming more and more suspect every day. Yesterday, a Hezbollah leader admitted that the Israeli soldiers were kidnapped specifically to set up an exchange for some Hezbollah members held by Israel. Can anyone find an Iranian motive in that? Additionally, presuming that Iran has stocked Hezbollah with missiles as a crude 'deterrent' to Israeli or US aggression on Iran, why would Iran waste that deterrent? How does it serve Iran?
The FIRST step on the journey to peace is to stop the killing.
The rest of the journey will be long and difficult, but it cannot happen until the killing stops. Then all the parties involved can sit down and start talking.
And all of the issues can be brought to the table and discussed.
All the parties, and all the issues? Is it possible that the US is refusing to talk to Syria - even as it blames it for its role in the current conflict - is that Syria will want to bring the Golan Heights issue to the table?
It is time to stop the killing.
There's a disturbing account of the bombing of the UNifil post in today's Guardian: "Israel bombed UN base for hours" -http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1830397,00.html
Annan said, "'the shelling started in the morning and went on until after 7pm. You cannot imagine the anguish of the unarmed men and women peacekeepers who were there'"
According to a detailed timeline of the incident provided by an unidentified UN officer and reported by CNN, the first bomb exploded around 200 metres from the post at 1.20pm (11.20am BST) yesterday.
Unifil observers then telephoned their designated contact with the Israeli military, who assured them the attacks would stop. In the following hours, nine more bombs fell close to the post, each one followed by a call to the Israeli military, the UN officer said.
The main Unifil base in the town of Naqoura lost contact with the post at 7.40pm, seemingly the time when the post received a direct hit."
And there's this story in the BBC: "Israel troops 'ignored' UN plea" - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5217176.stm)
Olmert's statement that "It's inconceivable for the U.N. to define an error as an apparently deliberate action," is a little hard to swallow after such reports.
An addendum to my earlier post re Hezbollah border incidents. This is from an e-mail sent to a Canadian TV-station on Jul 18 by the UNIFIL peacekeeper who died yesterday:
•The first was 21 Nov 05, when the Hezbollah tried to capture IDF soldiers from an IDF observation position overlooking the Wazzani river near the town of Ghajjar on the Blue Line. This action was unsuccessful and resulted in the deaths of the Hezbollah raiding force.
•On 01 Feb 06, a young shepherd boy was Killed by an IDF patrol near an abandon goat farm called Bastarra. Hassan Nasrallah (note: Hezbollah's leader) vowed that there would be consequences to this action. Team Sierra was tasked on 2 Feb 06, to assist in the investigation of the incident, and we sent one team to do so while the other team conducted its normal mobile patrolling activities.
•On 03 Feb 06, a limited engagement took place initiated by the Hezbollah on several of the IDF defensive positions located in occupied Lebanon.
•Then on 28 May, the Islamic Jihad (PLO) fired rockets from South Lebanon, into Israel, which elicited an immediate aerial bombardment of positions near our patrol base and in the Bekka valley
You want to see Nasrallah at the Hague? what about Bush, Olmert and Sharon?
at the latest count Hezbullah had killed 17 civilians and 36 soldiers.
Israel has killed over 500 civilians. Have they killed 1059 Hezbullah fighters? I dont think they've even killed 10.
There is absolutely 100% no moral equivalence between the two sides Juan. The numbers dont match up. say what you like, but to compare the conduct of Hassan Nassrallah to that of Ehud Olmert is shameful.
You've stated that the Katyusha rockets are innaccurate and are bound to cause some civilian deaths and thats your reason Nassrallah is a war criminal???? Well the Israeli weapons are supposedly 'precision guided' so they have absolutely NO excuse.
If the tables were turned and it was Nassrallah who had the luxury of state of the art bombers i can guarantee he would no attack civilians.
On the lookout now, I find others who have discovered that the anti-Semite rap is really a call to the faithful and only incidentally a slur on the infidel :
Five Myths That Sanction Israel's War Crimes
Johnathan Cook says : " This week I had the pleasure to appear on American radio, on the Laura Ingraham show, pitted against David Horowitz... It was a revealing experience, at least for a British journalist rarely exposed to the depths of ignorance and prejudice in the United States on Middle East matters – well, apart from the regular whackos who fill my e-mail in-tray... Horowitz's response to every question, every development in the Middle East, whether it concerns Lebanon, the Palestinians, Syria, or Iran, is the same: "They want to drive the Jews into the sea." It's as simple as that. Not even a superficial attempt at analysis; just the message that the Arab world is trying to finish off the genocide started by Europe. And if Laura is any yardstick, a lot of Americans buy that stuff."
I wonder if any of the people in our Administration who are reportedly chomping at the bit to take out Iran using our spare military asset - i.e. the USAF - are drawing any conclusions now from Dan Halutz's disastrously mistaken belief that air power would take out Hizbollah.
When does Israel officially become a "rogue state"?
When will Congressional Democrats get the courage to criticize Israel?
Thank you for this informative entry. I would like to add one related point. The fact that Israel is deliberately inflicting harm on Lebanese noncombatants in order to isolate Hezbollah is terrorism. "Terrorism" has numerous definitions in the legal and philosophical literature, but the most common is "political violence intentionally directed against noncombatants." Given the immense political significance of the word at the present time, this is an important point. Despite what many in Washington want to believe, Israel is not fighting a war against terrorism, but rather they are using terrorism. Viewing Israel as an ally in the so-called "war on terror" is thus completely misleading.
On the day of the Greek Kalends.
More words on collective punishment from those who know (from the start of the conflict):
Israel called Wednesday's abductions an act of war, and Maj. Gen. Udi Adam, head of Israel's Northern Command, said he has "comprehensive plans" to battle Hezbollah throughout Lebanon, not just in its southern stronghold.
"This affair is between Israel and the state of Lebanon," Adam said. "Where to attack? Once it is inside Lebanon, everything is legitimate -- not just southern Lebanon, not just the line of Hezbollah posts."
[my emphasis]
And yet, many of those defending israel will argue point blank that no collective punishment is taking place.
When you write:
... Hizbullah is ratcheting up its kill ratio with the Israeli military toward 1:1, something no other Arab fighting force has even approached.
By "military kill ratio" do you mean number of israeli military killed to number of hezbollah militia killed?
That is, do you believe hezbollah is approaching lethality parity with the Hagannah?
As others have noted, Prof. Cole's call for Nasralluh to be tried seems telling. If you think back on what the European powers have done to the undeveloped world (the Native American genocide, the US occupation of the Phillipines, denuding Africa of its resources, etc.), it is the capitalist system and its greedy administrators, that needs to be in the dock, not the leaders of the resistance thrown up to protect their people. The prior crimes were not seen on CNN; these are. Woe unto anyone who thinks they can get away with this.
The destruction of Lebanon's infrastructure might be rationalized as such according to those who back the attack on Lebanon (Israel and US):
"Once Lebanon is destroyed, and Hizzbullah crushed, the Lebanese will need large debt relief. The US will come to its aid, offering several billion dollars over a five year period under one condition: Lebanon must open up its economy to privatization -a free trade agreement. The Lebanese will be weak and will do as we say. Part of the aid will come in the form of US military hardware and Hollywood films."
(But in the present moment of reality, it is France -partially acting on its own- that is instrumental in securing the safe passage of humanitarian aid)
The current conflict demonstrates once again that human beings are still savages.
We can call ourselves sophicated and civilized and cultured but nothing hides the blackness inside us. War brings it out, lifts the stone to reveal the ugliness crawling underneath.
The butchery being carried out by Israel shows what happens when a nation is gripped by extreme nationalism and fanatical religion. Combine those things with the underlying savagery and primitiveness and killing becomes the norm, killing that involves hideous things like burning children with phosphorous.
America is to blame for Israel. It has armed it and blindly supported it. Without America, Israel could never have grown into the hated, militaristic Rogue State it has.
America could stop its barbarity today if it wanted to!
Empire is the Great Terror. Since 1945, the greatest terrorist award goes to the United States, guided as it's been by the Death Party--the main Imperial party that has two main and many minor factions. That this party is the sum of both main parties is proven again by the recent votes approving the warcrimes of the Israeli Satrap. The only way to win the real terror war is to eliminate Empire. Yes, that means no Israel. A secular Palestine sans racist walls and refugee camps that jews may choose to live in or not.
Great post, Juan.
Juan said, "And that it was done tells me that there is something sick in the heart of the Israeli military and political elite, a sickness of the soul that had better be faced and remedied before our entire world catches the contagion."
Seems to me that that attitude is already spreading to this US adminstration via neoconsevatives.
Bush's All Hat No Cattle World Tour Continues in Rome.....
Just look at these headlines from antiwar.com!
1No Truce 'For Weeks' as Talks Stall
2Hezbollah Demands Immediate Truce, Prisoner Swap
3. Iran Calls for Cease-Fire Syria Calls for Cease-Fire
4. Rice Warns Iran, Syria Not to Oppose Cease-Fire (!!!)
5. US Considers Troop Deployment in Lebanon
6 Proposed Multinational Force Won't Disarm Hezbollah of Its Rockets
7. '800,000' Lebanese Uprooted by Attacks
8 Israeli Strike Levels Whole Block in Downtown Tyre
9 Israel Bombs Lebanese Army Base, State TV Tower
10 Dissent Grows in Israel Over Lebanon
11. Hezbollah Could Be Gaining Strength
12 Hezbollah's Bigger, Better Arsenal Draws Israel Into Ground War
While I agree with most of what our host has writen, including the first part of this quote, "The fighting itself isn't going to lead anywwhere useful, though, and it is time for a ceasefire and political negotiations--the only way to actually settle such disputes", I am not clear on what is to be negotiated that would settle this dispute. What are Hezbollah's demands? Is there anything they want or that could satisfy them short of the destruction of Israel?
I ask these questions not to defend the israeli actions, which sicken me to the core. Rather, I'd like to be disabused of my conviction that there is no hope for peace between Israel and Hezbollah and all we can hope for are periods of lesser carnage.
Juan,
I agree that "[t]he fighting itself isn't going to lead anywwhere useful though, and it is time for a ceasefire." I'm just not certain what dispute exist between israel and Hezbolah that could be settled by "political negotiations."
The Israelis denied that they hit the base deliberately, but Kofi would know.
Kofi described Israeli actions, not Israeli intentions. And I don't see any indication that Kofi knows anything that hasn't appeared in the media.
Let me use an analogy to explain what I think Kofi is doing here. Suppose the police find me standing over the body of a dead man with the still smoking gun in my hand. The police realize that they don't know whether I'm guilty of murder. Perhaps it was self defense. Perhaps the gun discharged accidentally. But a simple assertion that I'm not guilty is not going to satisfy the police. They will question me further. And when they question me, their approach will be to imply, if not say, that if I don't talk the evidence will leave them no choice but to assume the worst about me.
Kofi's job in this situation is to protect his people. He isn't trying to offer a balanced assessment of Israel's actions; he's putting pressure on Isreal.
Israel's attack on the U.N. base was probably an accident, but even if it was an accident, Kofi is right to expect Israel to do more. When the United States bombed the Chinese embassy, it issued a statement saying that the bombing was an accident. The president of the United States publicly apologized for the error. The military conducted a detailed investigation of the error. And, based on the results of the investigation, the military changed its procedures to make a similar error less likely to occur in the future.
"Kenneth Almquist said...
The Israelis denied that they hit the base deliberately, but Kofi would know.
Kofi described Israeli actions, not Israeli intentions. And I don't see any indication that Kofi knows anything that hasn't appeared in the media.
Let me use an analogy to explain what I think Kofi is doing here. Suppose the police find me standing over the body of a dead man with the still smoking gun in my hand."
Very interesting analysis! Interesting because it uses a situation different from reality.
The acutal case scenario would be, "The police find me standing over a dead man with a still smoking gun in my hand. The police had warned me for eight hours that my gun was loaded and the man I was shooting at was a Police Observer, not a member of a street gang. The police had asked me, repeatedly, to stop shooting at the man. I proceeded to kill the man. The police know I killed the man and I know I killed the man. Regardless, I demand an apology from the police when they state I intentionally killed the man."
There you go. Much better analogy.
Kenneth Almquist you are deluding yourself, but no one else. There were 10 calls back forth between the UN people and the Israelis, protesting the proximity of the Israeli shelling. There was no chance for an 11th. The Israelis knew exactly what they were doing.
Just as they knew exactly what they were doing when they murdered a total of 34 Americans and wounded 172 more.
Part of the strategy of the neocons is to make sure that everyone hates the Israelis. That way they can use their "we are victims in a world of subhuman gentiles" to whip the poor Israelis into line. The neocon regime in America has taken up the same tactic.
In Palestine the Israelis are now into their heart of darkness, purposely destroying a people, eliminating all traces of its existence : 9/11 Nablus
"We offered to give the Israelis the keys of the building so they could search it to make sure there was no one hiding there, but that was not good enough for the Israelis, who insisted on demolishing everything," said Abed Al Illah Ateereh, the director of the Ministry of the Interior in Nablus.
Ateereh was at the site Saturday morning directing dozens of municipal employees and volunteers sifting through the piles of wreckage and digging in the ruins in an effort to retrieve the few documents that were salvageable..
It was not an easy task.
"There is 100 percent damage," Ateereh said. "They destroyed the building completely, but that wasn't enough for the Israelis. They then used their Caterpillar bulldozers to churn up everything and mix all the documents with the soil so that nothing is able to be preserved," Ateereh said.
The ministry had at least 175,000 individual case files each containing multiple documents. It will be impossible to recover an entire case file, Ateereh said. Some of the newer documents are backed up on a computer, but the old historical records are priceless and irreplaceable.
"Passports, birth certificates, family information, identity records--all the kinds of information that an interior ministry would keep are all gone. These documents were used not only by Palestinians, but also by UNICEF and other agencies and foreigners who came to the ministry to do research," Ateereh said.
There was mention that Israel may be lacking in intelligence and possibly underestimated the strength of Hezbollah. As there seems to be vast storage of missiles hidden underground, have there been investigations into the usage of underground tunnels from Syria to Lebanon for the transport of missiles from Syria to Hezbollah?
Post a Comment
<< Home