Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Saturday, August 05, 2006

Thousands of Sadrists Rally for Hizbullah in Baghdad
Guerrilla Uprising in Mosul



Some 100,000 Sadrists rallied against Israel's war on Lebanon [Ar.] in Sadr City on Friday, their ranks swelled by an influx of demonstrators from Maysan and Wasit provinces. Al-Zaman notes that this demonstration comes two days after a similar big event for the same purpose held by the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq. They also noticed a significant phalanx of women demonstrators, which Western reporters seem to have missed. The estimate of 100,000 comes from the LA Times, and strikes me as plausible. The US military attempted to play down the numbers, but frankly I don't trust them on something like this, which has ideological implications.

Al-Hayat [Ar.] says that despite the enormous size of the crowd, there were no untoward incidents. (The Mahdi Army checked the demonstrators carefully as they came into Sadr City, and the Ministry of the Interior, which gave a permit for the rally, also provided security). On leaving, however, some demonstrators were fired upon as they passed through the volatile Dura district of the capital. Two days ago during the SCIRI rally, al-Hayat says, Sunni guerrillas killed 3 of them. US troops intervened toward the end and were responsible for the deaths of two demonstrators.

This time, US troops set up a security perimeter around Sadr City, using tanks and armored vehicles. Demonstrators raised both Lebanese and Iraqi flags and chanted against Israel and in favor of Hizbullah. Some wore white funeral clothing, announcing their willingness to risk martyrdom. They burned US and Israeli flags.

Al-Sharq al-Awsat says that [Ar.] they chanted, "Death to America, Death to Israel!" They carried large posters with images on them of Sheikh Hasan Nasrullah, the leader of the Hizbullah, and Muqtada al-Sadr. Young demonstrators chanted, "We are the troops that Nasrullah is calling for, and we shall burn Haifa!"

Shaikh Hazim al-Ariji, of the Sadr movement, delivered a sermon in which he blamed Israel and in which he announced his solidarity with Hizbullah, which he compared to the Iraqi Mahdi Army. Hizbullah had thrown a fright into the Israelis because they clearly are not afraid of death, he said.

Some 33 persons died or were announced dead in Iraq's civil war violence. A tribal chieftain in Basra was assassinated.

In Mosul, from which the US withdrew most of the 3500 troops that it just sent to Baghdad, local guerrillas staged a virtual uprising against local Iraqi police and soldiers. The US military appears to be playing musical chairs, attempting to pacify Baghdad by bring troops there, but then losing control of the security situation in Mosul!

There were big demonstrations Friday in Cairo, Amman and Pakistan against the Israeli war on Lebanon.

George W. Bush had to be briefed that there are two major branches of Islam before the Iraq War. He did not know what Shiism was. He said, "I thought the Iraqis were Muslims."

5 Comments:

At 4:40 AM, Blogger John Francis Lee said...

Some 100,000 Sadrists rallied against Israel's war on Lebanon
The estimate of 100,000 comes from the LA Times, and strikes me as plausible. The US military attempted to play down the numbers, but frankly I don't trust them on something like this, which has ideological implications.

I know you've written that you were a military brat, Juan Cole, so I'll cut you some slack here. I see no reason to trust ANYTHING the US military says. They lie when they don't have to, just to keep in practice. The Iraqis say 1,000,000. Let's say 500,000.

Thomas Friedman is said to be advocating a pull out of US troops in Iraq now. It's not hard to figure out why. They are about to be slaughtered. At least driven out of the country. No help from Iran needed.

And it is Thomas himself and the neocons whose butts are perched squarely on the scapegoat's bareback. They insisted on getting us into this disaster and now they are desperate to avoid the consequences of their actions.

Just as the NYTimes and the Israelis themselves have been insisting that their actions against the Palestinians, Lebanese and Syrians over the past forty years have had no consequences.

The mass murders of 9/11 happened not because of the injustices perpetrated by the US/Israeli Axis in the Middle East, but because "they hate our freedom".

Well, a Third of Americans suspect 9-11 government conspiracy. That 9-11 was trumped up to provide the "catastrophic catalysing event - like a new Pearl Harbor" called for by the neocons in their Project for a New American Century's report Rebuilding America's Defenses. The neocons had better use the spurs on that poor old scapegoat. The ire of us Americans will soon be upon them!

The 2586 Americans slaughtered in Iraq to date, the 18988 wounded, all were slaughtered and maimed by the neocon cabal that started the war in Iraq. The defeat, if that is what we're able to get away with rather than slaughter, of US forces in Iraq is the consequence of Friedman's and the other neocons' decisions to use American forces for their neocon "adventures".

Let us hope that the Shia in Iraq are more reasonable with regard to the fate of American troops there than the neocons were and continue to be with regard to the fate of Iraqi and Lebanese civilians.

There is no reason for us to equivocate with the neocons, however. Never again will we let our national government fall into the hands of foreign power!

 
At 5:10 AM, Blogger Frank said...

Dear Professor Cole

My wife tells me that there was an unconfirmed report on last nights TV news that the Prime Minister postponed his holiday in order to write his resignation.

Apparently one third of his MPs disagree with his Middle East policy.

Still, he got his photograph taken with Governor Schwarznegger last week when he talked with him about climate change.

 
At 12:28 PM, Blogger InplainviewMonitor said...

Hariri Jr. visits Russia

Recently, Saad Hariri visited Russia. Saad Hariri is the son of the killed Lebanese PM Rafik Hariri, he is a multi-billionaire and a major anti-Syrian politician.

Hariri met with Russian defense minister S.Ivanov and other officials. He also gave an interview to Vremya daily.

This interview shows that Hariri does not have any consistent policy on Hizballah, but he is definitely anti-Syrian. He recognizes that Hizballah needs to be disarmed, but puts the question of Shebaa farms first. Since this issue is basically unsolvable, in typical ME manner, this suggests that Hariri actually opposes the Israeli goal of disarming the Hizballah guerillas.

As far as Syria is concerned, Hariri demonstrates generic Arab rhetoric, he blames the Syrian regime for weakness, corruption and inability to oppose Israel seriously. Most importantly, Hariri accuses Syria of cooperation with Al-Qaeda and even training their gunmen - which is obvious black PR. Syria is also blamed for intentions to return to Lebanon. Finally, Israel is declared to be Lebanon's enemy.

In the whole, all this looks like anti-Syrian and anti-Iranian provocation covered by crude anti-Israeli rhetoric.

 
At 1:19 PM, Blogger james_speaks said...

"They also noticed a significant phalanx of women demonstrators, which Western reporters seem to have missed."

Something needs to be done about the US media. I suggest this:

Select one organization with significant output. Selection ctiteria should include mass appeal (rules out PBS/NPR), potential for integrity (rules out FOX) and potential for change.

Engage in investment in that particular outlet. Support their advertizers. Organize letter campaigns correcting errors and omissions. Support their advertizers.

In short, find one news outlet in the US which could become the US version of the Guardian.

The investment in maintaining total control over the media is excessive, and the resources devoted to fighting this one initiative would strain the neo-cons immensely.

 
At 11:04 PM, Blogger M. Christofferson said...

Regarding Bush's lack of knowedge of Islam: Ignorance runs in the imperialist family. Colonial Secretary Winston Churchill wrote to an aide in 1921: "Let me have a note in about three lines as to [King] Feisal's religious character. Is he a Sunni with Shaih [sic] sympathies or a Shaih with Sunni sympathies, or how does he square it? .... What is the aristocratic high church and which is the low church? .... I always get mixed up between these two." -William R. Polk, Understanding Iraq (2005), 80-81.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home