85 Killed or Found Dead in Baghdad, Ramadi, etc.
Return of Death Squads to Baghdad?
A Majority of Americans Say War is Lost
In the past 6 months, US troops have been killed in Iraq at the highest rate since the war began.
For the first time in polling on the Iraq War, a majority of Americans (51%) say that they expect the United States to "lose" in Iraq. Worse, 66 percent say that the war was not worth it! The public is divided about what to do about this white elephant it clearly thinks it bought. A slight majority says that a timetable for withdrawal should be set, while 48% oppose such a step. Only 29% say that Bush is doing a good job in Iraq. (One shudders to imagine what a bad job would have looked like!)
Some 85 persons were killed or found dead in Iraq on Tuesday.
Iraq's streets continued to function as a macabre open morgue. Police found 25 corpses, most showing signs of torture, in Baghdad. The creeping back up of the number of corpses found each day suggests renewed activity on the part of death squads, both Sunni and Shiite. I'm surprised that they are able to operate with such impunity in the capital given the increase in the number of US and Iraqi troops there.
In Mosul, nine bodies were found. Near Diwaniyah in the Shiite south, 4 bodies were discovered. There has been fighting in Diwaniya between the Mahdi Army and local police, dominated by the Badr Corps of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq. In Suwayra south of Baghdad, 3 bodies were fished from a river.
In Ramadi, authorities made a gruesome discovery of a small mass grave with 17 decomposing bodies in it, probably victims of the Salafi Jihadi movement, "The Islamic State of Iraq."
There were also scattered car bombings and mortar strikes.
Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, spiritual leader of the Shiites, met Tuesday with Sunni clerics and they issued communiques calling for the end of sectarian violence. (The Iraqi clerics, including Sistani, have, however, lost political control and no one much pays attention any more to such counsel.)
Sam Dagher of CSM reports on the way that the resignation of the Sadrist ministers from al-Maliki's cabinet points to fissures within the ruling United Iraqi Alliance coalition of fundamentalist Shiite parties.
The big demonstration in Basra on Najaf -- some say 20,000 strong-- and continued militia violence in that city pose a challenge to stability in Iraq's major petroleum exporting port. Without security in Basra, it is hard to see how the Iraqi government can hope to survive.
The transcript and streaming video of my appearance Monday on the Lehrer News Hour-- regarding the resignation of the Sadrist ministers from the cabinet-- is now available both as transcript and streaming video.
Tom Engelhardt on tell-tale changes in Bush's rhetoric and figures of speech with regard to the Iraq War.
The USG Open Source Center paraphrases Iraqi news items for April 16:
' Al-Manarah on 15 April runs on page 3 a 1,000-word report citing Maysan Governor Adil Muhawdar Radi confirming that Iraqi security forces are ready to assume security responsibility in the governorate. Radi outlined the development projects in the governorate. . .
Al-Sabah al-Jadid carries on the front page a 340-word editorial by Chief Editor Isma'il Zayyir urging the government to enforce law and order in Basra before it turns into another Al-Fallujah. . .
Al-Sabah carries on the front page a 120-word report citing Al-Sadr Bloc Chairman Nassar al-Rubay'i saying that the bloc will withdraw from the government because multinational forces still control the security responsibility. . .
Al-Sabah carries on page 3 a 260-word report saying that the Supreme Judicial Council has presented a memorandum to parliament calling for the lifting of immunity from Adnan al-Dulaymi for his alleged involvement in supporting terrorism. . .
Al-Mashriq carries on page 2 a 170-word report citing Iran officials doubtful of an imminent US attack because the majority of its forces are tied up in Iraq.
Al-Mashriq carries on page 3 a 1,400-word report entitled 'King Abdullah warns against hidden calls to divide Iraq.' . .
Al-Mashriq carries on page 3 a 300-word report saying that a number of Iraqi members of parliament criticized the conference held in Baghdad to discuss the temporary leadership of the southern region to include three Maysan, Basra, and Dhi Qar Governorates. . .
Al-Adala carries on the front page a 120-word report saying that Kuwait has reiterated its solidarity with Iraq, Algeria, and Morocco to combat terrorism. . .
Al-Adala carries on the front page a 120-word report citing Ammar al-Hakim saying targeting Karbala will either to control authority or cause murder of the masses.
Al-Bayyinah al-Jadidah carries on page 2 a 120-word report citing Parliament Second Deputy Speaker Arif Tayfur saying that a US company, in coordination with the Interior Ministry, will be in charge of protecting parliament.
Labels: Iraq War

|
9 Comments:
"Winning" a war of aggression is like winning a rape. It is a contradiction in oxymorons, and morally heinous to boot.
Failure to recognize this is dimensionally-challenged thinking.
Dr. Cole,
You write, "I'm surprised that they are able to operate with such impunity in the capital given the increase in the number of US and Iraqi troops there." I think we all agree. I noticed this snippet (linked to my blog about the diary, the website link is currently down) in a recent Baghdad diary kept by CAP fellow Larry Korb. He writes, "The other thing that struck me was the lack of American soldiers patrolling the neighborhoods. In fact, in my whole time here I did not see one American soldier outside the Green Zone." I don't know what that means, maybe they're in the houses they've ocupied... I know the metrics were way off but to not notice for counterinsurgency but to not physically notice the "surge"???
It's kinda shocking...
Prof. Cole,
In your PBS conversation yesterday, while some in the United States are talking about arming themselves against a similar misfortunate event as in Virginia Tech in the future, I think it was very wise and courageous of you to mention Virginia Tech. massacre in the context of daily voilance in Iraq.
I found Noam Chomsky's comparison of the U.S. in Iraq to the Soviets in Afghanistan quite interesting... You don't "win" ... you continue to promote violence and drive the population to extremism.
Prof. Cole, one doesn't "buy" a White Elephant, it was given by the King of Siam to Ministers who had let him down as the proverbial gift that kept on giving. Since the White Elephant was considered sacred, the unfortunate Minister couldn't get rid of this dubious "honor," but had to continue the expense of feeding its voracious appetite until it died of natural causes! Would that Richard "Prince of Darkness" Perle, among countless others, should awaken one day to the sight of the sacred White Elephant in his driveway--it would definitely be a conversation piece.
This doesn't invalidate your meaning, of course, but merely puts it into greater context.
If you travel to any Muslim country even the once in south east Asia this is what you will be told starting from less educated worker class all they way to top intellectuals :
Let see who started this to stop the USSR penetrating south and making them trouble on their occupied Muslim territories , ah we did back in mid seventies when we were loosing the south east Asia war we needed to protect the oil rich Muslim countries from the soviets so we went on the cheep and promoted religion it worked then.
Now we told this Muslims Defending your religion against communism is good but defending it against Christian armies is Bad and uncivilized. Civilized Muslim freedom fighters should fight invading Soviet army in Afghanistan that is good, but they are terrorist when they fight invading armies of the United Western States in same Muslim lands of Afghanistan and Iraq that is bad.
Am I missing something here, ah that's right this Muslims are so dumb they can not understand this fair equation.
They will be happy when we the Christian forces of democracy bring them freedom from the dictators and tyrants we had imposed on them and vanish the outdated religion they have been practicing they will be happy to learn the teaching of the lord's bible they will great us with candies and flowers.
Why do we refer to Sunni fighers as Insurgents
Sunni insurgents and al-Qaida fighters
or
Sunni insurgent groups,
and Shiite fighers as Militia
Shiite Muslim neighbourhood and a stronghold for the militia
Is this just something left over from Rumsfield?
I just don't know whether to be heartened by the polls or not. I mean, I guess its good that FINALLY over 50% of the population realize that Iraq is a losing situation. But we are four years into this thing, and the ones who were right about Iraq- You, me, everyone else with a lick of common sense- are STILL being relegated to the back of the bus when it comes to some real media attention. THAT WOULD QUICKLY Increase that Poll's numbers, of course. Does the TRUTH just not sell that well? Is it just preferable for the American public to shut their eyes to it all in some vague hopes that it will all be alright? Our country is going down the tubes ala the Neocon empire. Can anything stop it BUT The clueless American population? Can some other country Invade America and deprogram our moronic fellow countrymen and/or shutdown the Fox Propaganda network?
Is that too much of a shortcut to real discourse? Is our country truly a lost cause when it comes to intelligence? I don't know what to think in times like this.
Prof. Cole
I guess because of 9/11 it has taken the American people so long to be in majority against the war. This war was illegal from the start and of course immoral. The war has fractured Iraq probably forever. A country which had electricity and healthcare now has bombs and death and destruction.
President Bush and some of the Republicans say things are getting better! When will these people wake up and see the damage they have caused on the Iraqi people?
Post a Comment
<< Home