137 Killed by Guerrillas
US to Talk to Iran
In a tidal wave of violence, 137 persons were killed or found dead in Iraq on Sunday.
Thousands of US troops searched south of Baghdad for 3 captured GIs. The Islamic State of Iraq (a guerrilla group) claimed to have been behind the ambush of two humvees full of US soldiers, which killed 5 of them and a translator. Three troops remain unaccounted for. US military personnel are systematically searching houses in Mahmudiya and elsewhere, which will have the unfortunate effect of further alienating the local population.
Sunni Arab guerrillas set off a massive bomb in front of the HQ of the Kurdistan Democratic Party in the small town of Makhmur southeast of Mosul. The KDP was holding a security conference at the time, and police and judicial officials were among the 67 dead and 70 wounded (Al-Hayat in Arabic]. The town falls in Ninevah Province, on the border with Iraqi Kurdistan. Some nationalistic Kurds have made a map that shows Kurdistan annexing parts of provinces where there are substantial Kurdish populations, including parts of Ninevah. Moreover, Kurdish Peshmerga fighters have been deployed for security purposes by provincial authorities. So it seems likely that the Sunni Arab attack had several goals. It stopped the security conference, it struck at Kurdish Peshmerga helping with the imposition of security and fighting the guerrillas, and it marked Ninevah as an Arab province where Kurds are imperilled. The guerrillas probably hope that Kurdish families will desert Makhmur and move to Irbil, thus forestalling the plans of Kurdish nationalists to annex parts of Ninevah.
In Baghdad, Sunni Arab guerrillas set off a bomb at the Sadriya Market in a largely Shiite area, killing 17 and wounding 48.
Another bomb killed 4 and wounded 17 in Baghdad. There was also violence at Mahmudiya and in Kirkuk.
Liz Sly of the Chicago Tribune examines the lack of progress toward Bush's 4 benchmarks in the Iraqi parliament. She finds that it is capable of being decisive in defending Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani from Aljazeera and in forbidding US troops to approach the Kadhimiya shrine of the 7th Imam. But benchmarks? Not so much.
Bush will allow the US ambassador to Iraq, Ryan Crocker, to talk directly to the Iranians about Iraq security, and the Iranians have agreed to open this channel. But former ambassador James Dobbins points out that Crocker as ambassador is not really a policy maker, so that the contact is fairly low-level. He thinks this problem points to a likely dispute within the Bush administration about how and if to proceed with talks with Iran. If they had made up their minds, then Secretary of State Condi Rice would be talking directly to Tehran.
Iraqi PM Nuri al-Maliki pledged to send more Iraqi troops to troubled Diyala Province, the site of daily carnage. But al-Maliki sent troops last fall, and they were mostly Shiite troops, and Diyala is 60% Sunni Arab. Because Sunni Arabs boycotted the January 2005 provincial elections, Diyala is run by the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, a Shiite party. A lot of the police are Badr Corps, the SIIC paramilitary. So Shiites trying to run a majority Sunni province is already one of the big problems. Sending Shiite troops loyal to al-Maliki is unlikely to settle things down.
Sawt al-Iraq, writing in Arabic, reports that the Da'wa Party Conference elected Nuri al-Maliki to be the secretary general of the Party as well as prime minister. His opponent for the post was the former prime minister Ibrahim Jaafari, who appears to have withdrawn from the fray late in the process.
The same reports ays that the Fadhila Party (Virtue) is putting forward suggestions for political reform. They want early elections, and a change to the electoral law to allow "open" lists.
Eminent historian Avi Shlaim on Blair's illegal Iraq War.
Labels: Iraq

|
5 Comments:
In your post you say, US military personnel are systematically searching houses in Mahmudiya and elsewhere, which will have the unfortunate effect of further alienating the local population. Interesting - NPR and Lt. Col. Kilcullen believe that "there are benefits that come from flooding an area if you like, for a temporary period, to really send a message to the population and bring them to our side."
To our side no less!
Unfortunately, from what we have seen in the earlier incident of kidnapping of US soldiers by Iraqi insurgents in the so-called Sunni triangle, the chances of finding the soldiers alive are low. I guess the ferocity of the search is driven more by the need to find the soldiers before the window of time in which the last hostages were killed.
Of course, banging down doors and arresting a large number of Sunni males as suspects is not going to win any hearts or minds. Nor will Sunni Iraqis rationalize this intrusion on their lives as being caused by the insurgency. They see only the flags on the uniforms that haul their men away; theirs not to reason why, theirs but to do or die.
Regarding the alledged Sunni attacks on Kurds, I'm wondering how much liason is happening between them and the Turkish CIA in targeting what they surely see as a shared enemy, given the many Turkish threats of hot pursuit or outright invasion.
this article by Rajiv Chandrasekaran in today's Washington Post : “The U.S. Agency for International Development estimates that nearly half of Iraqis are unemployed or work fewer than 15 hours a week, but those figures do not include hundreds of thousands who once worked for state-owned enterprises and continue to collect about 40 percent of their original salaries. If they are counted... the true figure for unemployed and underemployed Iraqis may approach 70 percent...”
...reveals the philosophical rift that now exists between an eclectic Department of Defense and a capitalist/idealist apparent State Department ~ regarding U.S. economic policy in IRAQ.
Though the root causes of friction between these two entities are no doubt founded in pedestrian 'turf wars' and personality conflicts between powerful individuals within both bureaucracies ~ the intellectual debate of "postwar economic reconstruction = power" policy is reminiscent of McArthur vs. U.S. State Department, et al regarding Zaibatsu circa post-1945 Japan.
iow, a fascinating, apparently enduring conqueror's dilemma déjà vu.
I notice SIIC has replaced SCIRI, following your comments Saturday about the organization disavowing its relationship with Khameini and Iran, and the "Khomeinist doctrine of Vilayat-i Faqih or the Guardianship of the Jurisprudent"?
Is this distancing also true of the Badr Corps? Are their loyalties with Iraq, or Iran, where they were trained? How much of the distancing from Iran is real, and how much for the benefit of public consumption, primarily in the US?
Post a Comment
<< Home