Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Tuesday, January 08, 2008

24 Dead in Sunni Counter-Attacks;
Major Refinery in Flames

In a further sign of a determined new year's counter-attack by the radical Salafis and/or neo-Baathists, a wave of bombings and kidnappings swept Iraq on Monday, leaving 24 dead, dozens wounded.

In the eastern Sunni enclave of Adhamiya in Baghdad, now more and more surrounded by purely Shiite districts, Sunni guerrillas attacked the offices of the local Sunni Pious Endowments Board, which overlaps with the leadership of the pro-American Awakening Council. al-Hayat reports in Arabic that one guerrilla detonated a belt bomb, and the other used a car bomb. They killed 14 persons, including Col. Riyadh al-Samarra'i, and wounded 25. Al-Samarra'i had commanded units of Sunni militiamen on the American payroll. While the Awakening Councils in other provinces are mostly tribal levies, in urban neighborhoods of Baghdad they appear often to be manned by former soldiers of the Baath Army or former Sunni guerrillas.

Further, three Awakening Council patrolmen were killed in various attacks in south Baghdad and Bayji. Several angry commanders of Awakening Council fighters called Al-Hayat to complain that the Shiite government of PM Nuri al-Maliki was offering them no support and was leaving them as sitting ducks. They said that the Iranian Quds Force or the Mahdi Army were in part behind the government's reluctance to provide them with security. They predicted that the campaign against them was only beginning. Shuja` Naji Shakir al-Adhami, a former Baath officer now leading an Awakening Council unit in al-Ghazaliya, went further and accused the Iraqi government of collaborating in attacks on the councils.

Reuters reports other attacks on Monday:


' BAGHDAD - A bomb hidden in a street vendor's cart killed four people and wounded 16 others in the Karrada district of central Baghdad, police said.

BAGHDAD - A bomb stuck on the side of a parked car killed one civilian and wounded four, including two policemen, when it detonated near a police checkpoint on the outskirts of Baghdad's Shi'ite slum of Sadr City, police said. . .

BAGHDAD - Gunmen in five cars kidnapped between eight and 10 neighborhood patrol volunteers in Baghdad's northern Shaab district. Police said the volunteers had been manning a vehicle checkpoint.

BAGHDAD - Seven bodies were found around Baghdad, police said. . .

MOSUL - Two bodies were found in eastern Mosul, one of them handcuffed and blindfolded, police said.

LATIFIYA - Gunmen killed a neighborhood patrol volunteer at a checkpoint in Latifiya, 40 km (25 miles) south of Baghdad, police said.'


In what appears to be an industrial accident, one of Iraq's major oil refineries, was damaged on Monday. The damage to the refinery raised the specter of shortages of gasoline and kerosene. At least 4 persons were killed and 24 were wounded in the fiery blasts.

McClatchy adds:
' Diyala

Police found five bodies near the main street in Qara Kitta village 100 Kms east Baquba north of Baquba. One of the bodies was the body of the mayor of Qaraqoosh village.

Gunmen killed a civilian in Buhorz village south of Baquba today morning.

A police office and a member of Sahwa were injured when a mortar shell hit a combined check point downtown Baquba city today morning.

Kirkuk

Gunmen killed three civilians (a husband and his wife and an Iraqi army soldier) in Abo Saif village, part of al-Reyadh city west of Kirkuk city yesterday night.

A katyosha rocket hit the area near the building of Iraqia channel downtown Kirkuk city today morning. No casualties were reported. '


Bill Boyarsky argues that leading Democratic candidates are not facing the truth, that the US cannot afford a continued Iraq troop presence in addition to the costs of implementing universal health care.

Farideh Farhi weighs in on the issue of the Iranian gunboats making a run at US naval ships. She feels that if the radio intercepts were accurate, it is highly unlikely that these were local units acting alone-- as I had suggested.

See also the recent postings at Global Affairs on Pakistan by Barnett Rubin.

Labels:

9 Comments:

At 8:03 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The shia must be rubbing their hands in glee. The sunnis are now reaping the seeds they sowed from 2003-2006 with their foolish campaign against the 75% majority community.

They are surrounded in the old baathist stronghold and what are they doing? Blowing each other up!

Indeed the shia smile. All this, the result of Maliki going to anbar last year and starting the same awakening project he now seeks to torpedo. He was pictured famously holding tribal shaiks hands and waving them in the air, with a huge grin on his face, as if to say 'I know you sunnis hate my rafidi ass, that wont change, so just take a look at the Anbar Sheiks with me, collaborating fully!', knowing full well that what followed would be inter-sunni strife between the 'collaborators' and the 'resistance'.

History will be unkind to Maliki, but I gotta hand it to the guy, he's a sly, tough bastard. Go to youtube and watch the ban kyi moon video where the mortar lands nearby. Ol' Mooni hits the dirt while Maliki doesnt flinch.

Should he meet Saddams fate by the insurgents at any time i expect an even more resistant last stand than the one the tranquilised Saddam gave.

 
At 8:25 AM, Blogger workshop said...

My guess is that the Iranian miitary was probing US naval tactics a little - if they are listening to what Bush is saying in Israel, then they HAVE to be more concerned than ever about Plan B (I think Sy Hersh and others have reported on this, as a concept hatched by Cheney and others, where Israel attacks Iran first, Iran counterattacks, and the US piles on) - and in case Plan B ever actually takes place (God grant it doesn't), Iran will almost immediately have to try to knock out as much of the US Navy as it could reach, I would guess.

I wish Congress would make it very clear to Bush that he should NOT be contemplating any attack on Iran, and that if Israel attacks Iran, it's on its own, except that we will try to get them to desist.

Sigh. You'd think a Democratic Congress would WANT to be peacemakers...

 
At 11:35 AM, Anonymous JHM said...

The former Iraq has begun to resemble Looking-Glass Land:

... three Awakening Council patrolmen were killed in various attacks in south Baghdad and Bayji. Several angry commanders of Awakening Council fighters called Al-Hayat to complain that the Shiite government of PM Nuri al-Maliki was offering them no support and was leaving them as sitting ducks. They said that the Iranian Quds Force or the Mahdi Army were in part behind the government's reluctance to provide them with security. They predicted that the campaign against them was only beginning. Shuja` Naji Shakir al-Adhami, a former Baath officer now leading an Awakening Council unit in al-Ghazaliya, went further and accused the Iraqi government of collaborating in attacks on the councils.

___
The principle of any vigilante organization is -- or I thought it was -- that temporary volunteers must step forward do what the regular forces of order can not. Poor M. al-Málikí's Fedguv could not ensure safety on the streets of al-Fallúja and other Sunni towns, so therefore the Baní Sahwa had to arise and police the neighborhood. (Isn't that what happened?) Now here are the B.S. complaining to al-Hayát that the Green Zone collaborationists do not sufficiently protect the vigilantes! But that's ridiculous, if they could extend such protection, there would have been no need for the vigilantes to exist in the first place.

Alternatively, from the customer side, what on earth is the use of a pack of wannabe "Guardian Angels" who cannot even guard themselves? Would you buy an alternative government from klutzes like that? Would the late Miss Rand of Petersburg and Mr. Nozick of Harvard, the distinguished theorists of Competing Governments™, have bought their own product from the Baní Sahwa?

 
At 1:18 PM, Anonymous KeithMcCl said...

Surely the US Navy would make plenty of videos of any such incident for later analysis.

 
At 1:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The first thing I thought of when I heard about the Iranian boats was the Gulf of Tonkin. The Bush administration is looking for a reason to start something. Whose fault is it that no one believes them anymore?

 
At 4:09 PM, Blogger daryoush said...

The Iranian-US Navy incident sounds "fishy".

If this was a real accident about to happen then you would think the US Navy would want to work with the Iranian Navy, or set up some sort of hot-line, to make sure these things wont happen.

It seems though Bush Administration is more interested in propaganda aspect of it. A more logical explanation is that with George Bush's trip to Israel, he needs a diversion, otherwise the focus would be in his policies.

This article is interesting in this regard:

http://presscue.com/node/37550

 
At 7:18 PM, Anonymous Pertelote said...

From you, Professor Cole,
5/3/06

It is obvious that powerful political forces in Washington are fishing for a pretext to launch a war on Iran, and that they are just delighted to have Ahmadinejad as cartoon villain and pretext. But they had a moderate, reforming president in Mohammad Khatami for 8 years, and just blew off all his overtures to the West. Iranians organized big candle-light vigils for America after September 11, in sympathy!

Washington never gave the reform movement the slightest encouragement, perhaps in hopes that the Iranians would be forced to turn right again and form a proper object of US hatred. If so, they got their wish last summer, when Ahmadinejad used the same dirty techniques to get elected as had George W. Bush.

All the warmongers in Washington, including Hitchens, if he falls into that camp, should get this through their heads. Americans are not fighting any more wars in the Middle East against toothless third rate powers. So sit down and shut up.

One, two, three, four! We don't want your stinking war!

We are not going to see any more US troops come home in body bags at Dover for the sake of some Cheney affiliate grabbing the petroleum in Iran's Ahvaz fields.

We are not going to have another 15,000 wounded vets flood onto our streets with spine damage and brain damage.

We are not going to put Yazd behind barbed wire to liberate it, as a millenarian Christian general did to Habbaniyah in Iraq.

We are not going to imprison and torture thousands of Iranians at Evin Penitentiary in Tehran, as worthy successors to the bloodthirsty Shah and Khomeini.

We are not going to kill 200,000 Iranians with aerial bombardments of Tabriz, Isfahan, Qom, Kerman, Shiraz and Mashahd.

We are not going to let dozens of US corporations loot the American people and the Iranian people alike with no-bid "contracts", embezzlement, corruption, and graft.

We are not going to let you have a war against Iran.

So sit down and shut up, American Enterprise Institute, and Hudson Institute, and Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and American Heritage Foundation, and this institute and that institute, and cable "news", and government "spokesmen", and all the pundit-ferrets you pay millions to make business for the American military-industrial complex and Big Oil.

We don't give a rat's ass what Ahmadinejad thinks about European history or what pissant speech the little shit gives.

I call on university students across America to begin holding antiwar rallies. The only way you can have a war on Iran is to draft the young people. It is you who are on the line. Demonstrate!

Demonstrate against the very hint of war! Demonstrate in front of the warmongering "institutes" in Washington, DC! Demonstrate to end the one we've already got! (See Speaker's Forum on Iraq


Here is what the real Iran experts think about the prospect of an Iran war.

Because Hitchens's dirty tricks and lies against me are only the beginning. Whoever stands against the Perpetual War machine will be attacked, slimed, marginalized, and destroyed if the warmongers get their way. I don't care. Thus far and no farther.

One, two, three, four. We don't want your stinking war!

posted by Juan Cole @ 5/03/2006 06:30:00 AM

 
At 7:29 PM, Anonymous pertelote said...

1,2,3,4 I don't want your stinkin' WAR!!!

 
At 2:33 PM, Blogger Torrance Stephens bka All-Mi-T said...

they need to focus on the econonmy and iraq....the new efforts and focus on surge and money will not work . sunni or latter
- Show quoted text -

 

Post a Comment

<< Home