Israeli Atrocity on Gaza Civilians
It is a perfect time for the Israeli government to commit a war crime on the miserable civilians of the Gaza Strip. The US primary season has created a news blackout on US television about foreign news (apparently the public of the world's sole superpower is not estimated by corporate news executives to be able to handle more than one story). So most Americans will never even know that the Israelis have cut off fuel to Gaza's power plant, depriving tens of thousands of people of electricity.
I sympathize with Israeli civilians who have been subjected to illegal bombardment by Hamas. (That bombardment has not recently resulted in loss of life, but it is traumatizing, especially for children.) But one has to ask whether the Olmert government has behaved toward Gazans in such a way as to try to achieve peace. (The unilateral withdrawal of colonists has been followed by frequent bombardments and incursions and arrests, political meddling and a placing of the whole Strip in a kind of geo-penitentiary.) Israeli deployment of excessive force in recent weeks has resulted in dozens of deaths in Gaza. Even if military action were justified, it is only legitimate for the Israelis to punish Hamas fighters doing the firing, and big bombs should not be dropped near civilian apartment buildings. Don't they, like, have SWAT teams?
Just a reminder that electricity is life and death for some people. The low is 48 degrees F. tonight; it is cold without electricity. And another reminder that the children of Gaza, who I suspect are 2/3s of the population, haven't done anything wrong, to be punished by this blockade:
' Health Ministry official Dr. Moaiya Hassanain warned that the fuel cutoff would cause a health catastrophe. "We have the choice to either cut electricity on babies in the maternity ward or heart surgery patients or stop operating rooms," he said.'
Here is what wikipedia has to say about the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949. Note that "protected persons" are just non-combatants, i.e. innocent civilians such as children, women and unarmed or injured men:
' Article 33. No protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited.
Pillage is prohibited.
Reprisals against protected persons and their property are prohibited.
Under the 1949 Geneva Conventions collective punishments are a war crime. Article 33 states: "No protected person may be punished for an offense he or she has not personally committed," and "collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited."
By collective punishment, the drafters of the Geneva Conventions had in mind the reprisal killings of World Wars I and II. In the First World War, Germans executed Belgian villagers in mass retribution for resistance activity. In World War II, Nazis carried out a form of collective punishment to suppress resistance. Entire villages or towns or districts were held responsible for any resistance activity that took place there. The conventions, to counter this, reiterated the principle of individual responsibility. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) Commentary to the conventions states that parties to a conflict often would resort to "intimidatory measures to terrorize the population" in hopes of preventing hostile acts, but such practices "strike at guilty and innocent alike. They are opposed to all principles based on humanity and justice."
Additional Protocol II of 1977 explicitly forbids collective punishment. . . '
Wikipedia is just the common sense of the blogosphere. The Geneva Conventions were intended to avoid a repeat of the atrocities of WW II.
The Israelis are going to have to live in the midst of the Palestinian people for the rest of the century. The Palestinians are not going away. The Israelis cannot wish them away or intimidate them into accepting statelessness, dire poverty, foreign domination and a condition analogous to slavery.
Moreover, Israel itself requires, in order to flourish, extensive economic and other relations with the outside world. If it is going to behave like this, the outside world will become less and less willing to have those relations. The Israeli Right is their country's own worst enemy.

|
18 Comments:
Meanwhile, "senior military figures" in Israel are saying that the actions are not, in fact, causing a humanitarian crisis for Gaza. This - so quoth the senior military figure - is merely spin.
From here: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3496654,00.html
Israel has not ratified Protocol II of the Geneva Conventions.
"Don't they, like, have SWAT teams?"
You overlook the fact that urban warfare, which Israel is forced to fight when Hamas fires rockets from residential rooftops, makes it nearly impossible to separate the innocent from the guilty.
Israel does not TARGET civilians; this is not to say its actions are justified when an innocent bystander is killed. Your article begs the question of why it is okay for Hamas to specifically target Israeli civilians, but not okay for Israel to target Arab militants? Isn't it obvious to you that Hamas does not want peace? Otherwise it has a strong enough security force to stop any and all rockets from being fired from the Gaza Strip into Israel.
And regarding your citation of the 4th Geneva Convention: international bodies have rarely respected Israel's right to exist or defend itself. Ask yourself when was the last time the UN censured Palestinian terrorists for killing Israeli civilians? The world almost always sides against Israel and Jews...
Sounds like you may have an agenda. Check your facts.
It's not true that the Israeli's have to live with the Palestinian people, if they just kill them all. It is, after all, the only final solution to the Palestinian problem.
Israel lockdown plunges Gaza into darkness
20/01/2008 20h47
' GAZA CITY (AFP) - Gaza's only power plant shut down for lack of fuel on Sunday as Israel kept up a blockade of the Hamas-run territory in retaliation for rocket fire, despite warnings of a humanitarian crisis.
' The closure of the plant, which accounts for 30 percent of the population's needs, plunged entire city blocks in Gaza City into darkness, and was set to sharply worsen power cuts already hitting the impoverished coastal strip.
' The power station's shutdown has "plummeted Gaza City, which has 600,000 people, into darkness," John Ging told a news conference, adding that the loss of electricity "affects every aspect of the civilian population's lives here in Gaza".
' "If you visit any of the hospitals you will find that its generators are only producing enough electricity to keep essential equipment going. They are very cold, all of the wards, adding to the misery of the patients," Ging said
' On Sunday, Barak told the cabinet that the army was "weakening daily life in Gaza".
' "We are targeting the terror elements and we are trying to show the international community that we are exhausting all possible options before Israel decides on a broad (military) operation," a senior government official quoted him as saying. '
Before Israel decides on a broad (military) operation!!?? The "final solution" is at hand? Wake up Americans, Israelis, Europeans!!
The common sense of the internet on the Warsaw Ghetto :
' The Warsaw Ghetto was the largest of the Jewish ghettos established by Nazi Germany in Warsaw, former capital of Poland in the General Government during the Holocaust in World War II.
' Between 1941 and 1943, starvation, disease and deportations to concentration camps and extermination camps dropped the population of the ghetto from an estimated 450,000 to approximately 70,000. In 1943 the Warsaw Ghetto was the scene of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, the first urban mass rebellion against the Nazi occupation of Europe.
' On January 18, 1943, the first instance of armed resistance occurred when the Germans started the final expulsion of the remaining Jews. The Jewish fighters had some success: the expulsion stopped after four days and the ?OB and ?ZW resistance organizations took control of the Ghetto, building shelters and fighting posts and operating against Jewish collaborators. During the next three months, all inhabitants of the Ghetto prepared for what they realized would be a final struggle. The final battle started on the eve of Passover, April 19, 1943, when the large Nazi force entered the ghetto. After initial setbacks, the Germans under the field command of Jürgen Stroop systematically burned and blew-up the ghetto block by block, rounding up or killing any Jew they could capture. Significant resistance ended on April 23, 1943, and the German operation officially ended in mid-May, symbolically culminated with the demolition of the Great Synagogue of Warsaw on May 16, 1943.
' According to the official report, at least 56,000 people were killed on the spot or deported to Nazi concentration and death camps, mostly to Treblinka. '
Yet the US/UK/EU continue to apologize for, to arm, and to finance the much larger Palestinian genocide in the Gaza Ghetto. Wake up!!
Obviously we have given our approval for Israel to commit genocide against the Palestinians, but without the ovens. It might take another 100 years to complete, but whats the hurry.
Southern Lebanon has been poisoned with depleted uranium and cluster bombs which should reduce population there over the next 30 years. And the US is doing it's part to deplete the Muslim population, much of Iraq and Afghanistan has been similarly poisoned with depleted uranium.
This is the world we live in. Yet Americans live in a world where the reality they are presented is a great lie. Indeed much of our history is also a lie. To control the world, you must control the past as well as current reality. It has been controlled. The internet is allowed to live since it is a great tool to measure the effectiveness of their control, and to track those needing re-education, but it will soon be controlled as well and those needing re-education will be disappeared.
Welcome to 1984
I blogged this, and as a public service to all the die-hard defenders of Israel, I posted the usual arguments we hear in defense of such actions:
it doesn't count if they're Palestinians, because Palestinians deserve it, and anyway, Israel does not commit war crimes because remember the Holocaust! And anybody who says otherwise is an anti-Semite, so there! And Israel just has to defend herself! 9/11! Islamofascists! Rocket attacks! Al-Qaeda is going to nuke America so anything Israel does in Gaza/West Bank/Lebanon is reasonable defensive action!"
Oh, and let's not forget that old chestnut, which I first heard in 1974 when Israel bombed the refugee camp next to my village: "Palestinian terrorists hide in the skirts of their women, so if Israel happens to kill women and children while fighting terrorists, it's absolutely the terrorists' fault."
I see that somebody in comments has already posted a version of the "hiding in the skirts of their women" argument.
I can honestly say that, for once, a comment on this blog surprises me.
The immediate descent into "Godwin's Law" will come as absolutely no surprise to any longtime reader of this blog.
yea great solution casper, "kill all the palestinians." Thank you hitler. Killing all the palestinians off wont solve the problem. there are many other groups besides the palestinians that want the holy land. Also that would turn the rath of nations against the jews. the last thing they need is more people hating them.
From my cursory reading on the BBC news website & also from various televised news channels of the breaking news that Israel was about to lock-down Gaza I derived the following picture on Friday 18th January:
Since Tuesday 15th January 2008 Hamas & other militant factions within Gaza had fired over 100 of their Qassam rockets into Israeli territory. Although there were no Israeli casualties the psychological trauma visited on Israeli citizens was considerable particularly as many of the Israeli citizens under fire were not long-term residents & hence would not (yet) be psychologically inured to these violent episodes. The UN chief urged Israel to show all possible restraint whilst severely reprimanding Hamas for its continued & provocative firing of rockets at Israeli citizens. The Hamas rocket fire has effectively broken a two month long cease fire. Since Anapolis over 100 Palestinians have been killed. Mahmoud Abbas was quoted as condemning the Israeli air strikes.
This is a fair summary of the news as I received it on the BBC website & later on the same day on the Channel 4 terrestrial news channel (the BBC six 'o' clock news failed to cover the story at all). Needless to say this did not make too much sense to me. I was especially puzzled as to why the pro-western moderate Abbas had singled out in particular the Israeli air strikes without reference to Hamas & its rockets. I went back to the BBC website & after not a little digging managed to piece together the full picture as follows:
On Tuesday 15th January & five days after the departure of President Bush from Tel Aviv the IDF mounted a major military offensive deep into Gaza City – a substantial force was involved which included bulldozers, armoured vehicles, & helicopter gunships. The resulting firefight left 18 Palestinians dead & at least 48 injured. Mahmoud Abbas made the following outraged condemnation of the military action:
"What happened today is a massacre, a slaughter against the Palestinian people.
Our people cannot keep silent over these massacres. These massacres cannot bring peace."
Following this action Hamas broke its own effective two month ceasefire & resumed rocket fire into Israeli territory.
Most of the reportage I have seen on this latest crisis in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict refers only to the Palestinian rocket fire as having been fired since Tuesday. Clearly with the above omitted not only does the story not make sense but actually 'spins' the story giving it an entirely opposite interpretation, i.e., that the Israelis were merely responding to militant rocket fire albeit a little too robustly for some tastes.
I don't think I should have to go to such lengths to get properly informed as a citizen of a supposed liberal democracy. Somebody it seems is not doing their job properly & possibly not for the first time!
The BBC story that appeared on the 18th January 2008 is here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7195459.stm
The BBC story that appeared on the 15th January 2008 is here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7188807.stm
There is no link to this last story on the BBC website – to find it you have to do what I did, google it.
Within five years--after it again proclaims that it has no partner
for peace and negotiations with Palestinians are futile--Israel will
openly remake Gaza as its own Auschwitz, and will begin its own Final Solution. No more water reductions, or electricity cutoffs, or
targeted assassinations, or jet-fighter strikes, or even even
half-hearted incursions with tanks and bulldozers. No.
Instead, Israel will simply slaughter all the Palestinians in Gaza--and deport from the West Bank to Gaza any dangerous Palestinian residents so they too can be slaughtered. ('Dangerous' means any Palestinian resident who owns land a Jew wants.)
Israel will justify this deed as it has justified sixty years of its
other bloodthirsty deeds against the Palestinians, as an act of legitimate national protection from a fanatical and homicidal enemy.
If Israel is challenged, it will, as it has for sixty years, tell any
challengers this:
(1) Whatever harm an Arab does to an Jew is terrorism, and therefore evil. Whatever harm a Jew does to an Arab is self-defense, and therefore good.
(2) Jews were the victims of genocide; thus they have the right to
commit it.
Why must people always make a comparison between Israel and the Nazis? If Israel was not a predominantly Jewish country this false analogy would not continue to pop up. This isn't to say that I support many of Israel's blunt, harsh and often unrealistic methods of protecting their citizens but to consistently compare their actions with that of the Nazis is both a perversion of history and the legacy of the Nazis and also fails to give a realistic and legitimate weightiness to the actions of Israel. Words like "genocide," "holocaust" and "final solution" are catch phrases that may sound impressive and serious but really serve no purpose other than to incite people. Please be careful with what you say and how you say it because if you don't people aren't going to listen.
Anonymous at 6:16,
You say, "If Israel was not a predominantly Jewish country this false analogy would not continue to pop up. " I wonder what nation you live in that your could say something so unusual. Hitler and the Nazis are used as regular jargon for anyone in this era wishing to vilify a people or an action. There terms are used in relations to Saddam Hussein, Hamas' Meshal, Nasrallah, and Ahmedinajad. The word Holocaust is used by Native Americans to describe their national atrocity. (Which I think is probably apt.) It has also been used to describe abortions, ect..... The WWII terminology relating to the Nazis and the events surrounding them have been so overused by all parties it is losing its impact and meaning in general.
As to the issue of defense, the IDF actions in the past decade can no more be described as defense as stupid, inhumane Qassams that IJ is launching with Hamas' permission. I don't think anyone who has honestly and neutrally looked at the conduct of the Occupation could say that the IDF actions were meant to lead to stability or a peace that would protect its people. Their goals are short sighted until Israel as a nation has decided its path, given its conduct in their settlements, one would guess it is not peace. Look at the front of B'Tselem this week, they are now even harassing their own human rights groups to protect the settlers.
And, I am not blaming individuals, Jews or Israelis. It is the nature of a State to be greater than its components and to pursue its own powers. The strength of democracy is supposed to be in constraining it. But, the Israeli people live in too much fear of doing so, because the state has well presented the façade its actions protect, not hinder. How long until the truth of that, given the recent melodrama of non-liberation of Gaza, will take to penetrate individual conscience, who knows?
Really, this is an interesting thing, in a scientific way. In a human way, all sides are suffering and it is heart wrenching. Still, the siege of walled cities are well known in history, but thought to be ancient war-fare. Results should be predictable. They all die or they surrender under the terms the group sealing the area wishes. You are right. It is not Nazi. I thought, though I could be wrong, that the first to use the first to use this type of siege on a walled city it in the region was Alexander the Great. Obviously, much more archaic than the Nazis.
But Alexander was a young hot conqueror and didn't lead a quasi-fascist "reborn nation" to destroy the natives and settle on their land.
Alexander (al-Iskandar) would defeat the enemy's hierarchy and make them his tributaries. The Palestinians have no hierarchy. The Nazi comparison is valid as far as the mystical völkisch Element is concerned, as well as the will to eradicate one's enemies.
The story about Israel cutting off power to Gaza is false. It turns out that AP and others were mistaken.
Hamas shut down an energy plant in protest against Israel, but Israel has not cut off power to Gaza.
See CAMERA for more details (link below).
http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=2&x_outlet=2&x_article=1428
Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America
' The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) is a pro-Israel[1] American nonprofit, tax-exempt organization based in Boston which describes itself as a "media-monitoring, research and membership organization". The organization was founded in 1982 by Winifred Meiselman in Washington, DC to respond to perceived anti-Israel bias in the Washington Post. '
CAMERA
' CAMERA's website has an extensive database of journalists that it has focused on over the years (including many prominent Israelis).
' In one of its media alerts, it describes Israel's acclaimed historian Benny Morris as a "fabricator". It's other targets include Robert Fisk, Israel Shahak, Edward Said, Norman Finkelstein, John Pilger, Ilan Pappe, Amira Hass and Gideon Levy, and has even accused Israel's prominent daily Ha'aretz of fueling "anti-Israel bias". '
So, John? You mean we have to agree with everything that Robert Fisk or John Pilger says? No dissent?
- Inkan1969
Every righteous American should do something about stopping the U.S. foreign aid to Israel. We can definitely use $4bil a year for some good.
Post a Comment
<< Home