Provincial Elections Set;
Amnesty Announced for Prisoners;
Muqtada Said to be in Qom
Al-Hayat reports in Arabic on the passage by the Iraqi parliament of three important laws. These included the annual budget, a general amnesty that will free thousands of mostly Sunni Arab prisoners in the teeming Iraqi security prisons, and finally a "law on the provinces." The action came in the wake of threats by powerful politicians to dissolve parliament if it could not do a simple thing like pass a budget.
Al-Zaman (The Times of Baghdad) reports in Arabic that there was not actually a vote, but rather the laws were passed as a package by consensus. The consensus reflected a political deal among the major parties rather than a recorded vote of a majority of the MPs. Al-Zaman calls the method of the vote "unconstitutional." (They are protesting the lack of a recorded individual voice vote; it may be they also object to the bundling of the three separate laws together, which made MPs vote up and down, yes or no). Many MPs had interests in some of the laws but opposed a third, and therefore had to choose between betraying their interests or accepting legislation they really opposed. Al-Zaman quotes MP Salih Mutlak (a secular, ex-Baathist Sunni who is in the opposition) and MPs of the Sadr Movement as expressing fierce opposition to the law regarding amnesty for prisoners because it allowed for a delay in their release of six months.
This undemocratic and unconstitutional way of passing through legislation that the Americans insist be approved, in the teeth of opposition from a majority of MPs, was ironically employed in passing the constitution itself. Some version of it was passed without an individual voice vote in late August of 2005 (after the deadline set by the Transitional Administrative Law) and then the US embassy went on tinkering with the text right up until the October 15 referendum! It is ironic that when the Americans make their influence felt most strongly in the Iraqi government, that government acts least democratically.
The budget that the parliament sort of passed, on its sixth try, awarded the Kurdistan Regional Government 17% of the $40 billion central government budget, with the proviso that this proportion be revisited in 2009 after a census, to be completed by the end of December, 2008. (Many Arab delegates do not believe the Kurds constitute so large a proportion of the total population of Iraq).
The law of the provinces bestows special prerogatives on them that al-Hayat does not specify. McClatchy says it also sets Oct. 1 as the date for provincial elections.
The setting of a date for provincial elections is extremely important. I have argued that elections in the Sunni Arab-dominated provinces are a necessity for calming Iraq. Diyala, for instance, is 60% Sunni Arab but is ruled by the pro-Iranian Shiite party, the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq. The Sunni Arabs largely boycotted the provincial elections of January, 2005 (the turnout in al-Anbar was 2%). Thus, virtually none of the governments in the center-north and west of the country has much real legitimacy. It will be easier for the US to turn over security duties to elected provincial authorities who have the backing of significant numbers of Sunni Arabs, and so the elections could pave the way to a US drawdown in those provinces.
One reason that the provincial elections have been delayed is that there are fears in Baghdad that the Sadr Movement of Muqtada al-Sadr will sweep to power in the Shiite south. It from all accounts has gained in popularity as the current dominant provincial party there, the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, has become much less popular. (ISCI has been trying to run many of the southern Shiite provinces, but has not been able to provide security and services at the level desired by local people). Presumably one reason for bundling the law of the provinces with the amnesty law was to make Sadrist MPs vote for the package. They did not want to grant amnesty to Sunni Arab prisoners, but only by supporting this step could they get a date certain for provincial elections, which they think they will largely win.
Since the Sadrists want a quick US withdrawal, for them to sweep to power in many of the provinces (possibly including in Baghad province), could strengthen this demand.
One of my Shiite Iraq friends, from Najaf, thinks that there are no circumstances under which ISCI would turn the southern provinces over to the Sadrists, and that the vote will therefore be fixed.
Back to the parliamentary actions. The amnesty law provides for prisoners to be released who have not committed serious crimes (e.g. genocide & murder). It is a major victory for the Sunni Arab coaltion, the Iraqi Accord Front, which made its passage a condition for their return to the government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki. There are some 60,000 prisoners in Iraqi and US custody, many of them suspected of helping Sunni guerrillas, and many of whom have not yet been charged with any crime even though they have been held for many months.
Al-Hayat also reports that it has learned that Muqtada al-Sadr is studying in Qom with Ayatollah Kadhim al-Haeri, in order to become an independent religious jurisprudent in his own right. He is expected to be able to announce that status later this year. Theoretically, the laity could then begin following his rulings on the practice of Shiism. Last December, al-Hayat reported that Muqtada was studying in Najaf with Grand Ayatollah Muhammad Ishaq Fayyad, who is originally from Afghanistan.
And the newspaper says that US talks with Iran on issues in Iraq will begin in the Green Zone in Baghdad on Thursday.
McClatchy reports political violence in Iraq on Wednesday:
' Baghdad
A civilian was injured when a mortar shell hit Shaab police station in Shaab neighborhood north Baghdad around 8:00 am.
Two IED exploded targeting American army convoys in Ur neighborhood and Qanat Street east Baghdad between 1:00 and 1:15 pm. The US army confirmed the news saying that the two explosions caused minor injuries for two soldiers.
Gunmen broke in al Somood primary school in Zafariyah town southeast Baghdad around 2:00 pm. The beat the wife of the guard and hung her three old years son.
Police found three bodies in Baghdad today. The three bodies were found in Rusafa, the eastern side of Baghdad in the following neighborhood (1 body in Fadhil neighborhood and 2 bodied in Waziriyah neighborhood.)
Diyala
Gunmen opened fire targeting building workers while the workers were in their way to work from Sadiyah town to Himreen town northeast of Baquba city today morning. Five workers were killed and two others were wounded.
Police found a head of a civilian in Khalis town north of Baquba.
Kirkuk
Local police of Kirkuk found a body of a civilian in Sargaran town northwest of Kirkuk city yesterday night. Police said that the body was shot in the chest. '
Labels: Iraq

|
10 Comments:
ISCI (formerly SCIRI) was not all that popular to start with. The western "news" media who promote them often falsely claim that they are the bigget party in parliament.
Of the 109 seats won by the Shiite Alliance, they had 19% versus 23% for the Sadrists (38% including Fadhila) and 20% for the two Da'wa parties combined [source http://historia.org] This is after a massive campaign by SCIRI, funded by both Iran and the USA, and claiming that Sistani backed SCIRI in full. Plus irregulaties in the voting and a large terror campaign against the other parties.
When it cam to sharing the extra 19 'national' seats apportioned to the Shiite block, SCIRI received 9 out of the 19 to beef up their share to 23% vesus 22% for the Sadrists (2 more seats were added later by the Risaleyyon to surpass SCIRI, and they can count on the additional 13% by Fadhila.) Why should they get these seats is still a mystery.
However, I don't share the view that SCIRI can fix the vote. The USA and Sistani have largely withdrawn their support, and the Iranians want Sadr more now. The police leadership was given to SCIRI by the Americans and Brits, but the police are unreliable and can be scared off by few phone calls or leaflets.
The voting laws are still list-based, so SCIRI can keep their hugely unpopular leaders even if they get few votes (the SCIRI deputy for Anbar received just 100 votes in 2005!) The other parties want to change that to an open system, but it remains to be seen whether they can defeat the Americans and SCIRI who want to keep the existing system.
Juan Cole stated: "It is ironic that when the Americans make their influence felt most strongly in the Iraqi government, that government acts least democratically."
Illegal invasion of other nations, a President who rules by decree, torture of prisoners, Guantanamo, warrantless wire-tapping, criminal injustice, 400 million guns held by private citizens, ...
Which aspect of American democracy is not being being exported to Iraq?
An October 1st election would also well serve any American presidential candidate arguing for indefinite American military presence in Iraq. Provided, of course, that everyone participates in that election, and provided the elections aren't blatantly stolen, which might lead to riots or even open civil war.
14 février 2008
The setting of a date for provincial elections is extremely important.
I don't think that there can be any fair elections under the US occupation, you write it yourself just a few lines below, quoting your friend of Najaf. I'd add that the ISCI is a close ally of the US and that neither the US nor the ISCI want the Sadrists to win.
The timing of the elections is very interesting. So close to the American general elections. Hmmm, designed to hurt or help the Republicans? Or totally unrelated? Appears more than a little coincidental but 6 months does seem like the bare min. to pull off an election. Whether intentional or not it will likely serve to place the Iraq war front and center as the American campaigns go into the home stretch.
Why would Mutlak be against sunnis being released?
PS. I was looking forward to your comment on the assasination of Imad Mughniyeh... Or is he just another one of ''Nasrallah's mad bombers'' to you?
The US military has made $38 Million worth of payments to the families of civilians they have killed since 2004.
http://www.upi.com/International_Security/Emerging_Threats/Briefing/2008/02/13/us_has_paid_38m_to_iraqis_it_killed/5635/
The cash handouts, known as condolence payments, are made at the discretion of mid-ranking US officers in local areas and come from a special military fund called the Commanders' Emergency Response Program.
Counting Iraqi Casualties -- and a Media Controversy
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/shoptalk_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003711142
The author commissioned the "Lancet" study recently attacked in a National Journal report and by the Wall Street Journal. He calls the criticism a "hatchet job," fraudulent or based on innuendo.
One puzzling aspect of the news media’s coverage of the Iraq war is their squeamish treatment of Iraqi casualties. The scale of fatalities and wounded is a difficult number to calculate, but its importance should be obvious. Yet, apart from some rare and sporadic attention to mortality figures, the topic is virtually absent from the airwaves and news pages of America. This absence leaves the field to gross misunderstandings, ideological agendas, and political vendettas.
The upshot is that the American public — and US policy makers, for that matter — are badly informed on a vital dimension of the war effort.
Amnesty was proposed by Maliki years ago but vetoed by the proconsul and imperial senators and Dick/George.
http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=iraq+amnesty&hl=en&ned=ca&sa=N&start=30
What has changed?
KeithMcCl
Post a Comment
<< Home