American Idol and American Politics
I find it a little eerie how closely the finale of the television program American Idol resembles the presidential race.
Here you have an older male from the school of hard knocks; a younger, soulful man who inspires his peers; and a woman candidate who shows amazing resilience.
In a way, both Idol and the presidential race exemplify a sort of 'family romance' of American society.
Syesha Mercado was in the bottom three on a number of occasions, but she remained in the competition almost to the end. Don Kaplan wrote of her:
' Every week the bubbly brunette . . . has been on the verge of going home. And every week, it's been someone else who gets the boot . . . "Idol" fanatics have been saying for weeks that each episode of "Idol" would be Mercado's last. "But she keeps breaking through," says Michelle Boros . . . Boros thinks the singer has been underestimated by the experts because "she doesn't quite have that personality X-factor that the 'Idol' people like." . . . Kid Kelly, Sirius radio's vice president of music programming believes Mercado is hanging on because "she's a chameleon. She has this ability to transform herself each week - and at the end of the day, she's very talented." '
So you have the woman candidate who is a determined survivor even though it was pretty clear early on that she would not be the winner (winners don't keep being sent to the endangered zone). Ms. Mercado is said to have gotten through the stress of all those close calls by depending on her man.
As for the younger man in the competition, his fans complained that it was unfair to say that David Archuleta was 'inexperienced'. They pointed to his extensive experience on 'Star Search.'
Angie Mohr disagrees, writing:
' David Archuleta, being 17, appeals to younger teens and tweens and that is where his fanbase lies. He is the "pretty boy" of the two and his shy, halting interview responses highlight his youth and inexperience. '
Despite his charisma and almost cult-like following, Archuleta was dogged by controversy and upstaged by a key mentor who proved so disruptive that in the end he had to be banned from the set.
Mohr adds of rocker David Cook:
' David Cook has the rebel just-crawled-out-of-bed, tousled look that draws older teen and early twenties girls but also speaks to the boys-turning-men in the same age range. '
Simon Cowell said of David Cook on Late Night with Jay Leno,
' "Who would I like to win? I'm going to say David Cook," the acerbic judge told Leno. "Only because the guy started off working in a bar. You know, I kinda feel he deserves to win more. Where the other guy, you know, he's 17, cute, you know, hasn't had to work quite as hard as the other one." '
So why do I think there are these, like, cosmic parallels?
Oh, it is just a function of genre. You see, when you cover an election as though it is a talent contest and you zero in on personalities rather than issues, then this is pretty much the sort of melodrama you can construct. It becomes about determined women, less experienced young men, and more hardened older men who know how to mix a stiff drink. You would find these personalities in any tubby novel for sale at an airport bookstore. Mercado, Archuleta and Cook are far more complex and interesting persons than the stock characters that the media has imposed on them. But at least the wrong done them by simplification is minor; they are after all entertainers, and if they attain their potential they will have plenty of opportunity to tell their real stories.
With regard to our political leaders, the infotainment approach obscures the most weighty matters ever to face our Republic, and does a grave disservice to voters whose fate hangs in the balance.

|
12 Comments:
I like Clinton.
Dr. Cole,
I think you are watching a bit too much television.
Dr. Cole,
I never watch Idol as it's such an egregious example of corporate consumer manipulation. But I'm pleased to see you use the term "Republic", as that is what our Founding Fathers intended us to be. Would that both parties (and Right and Left) and our citizens actually behaved as though we were, rather than a mass democracy ruled by a managerial state. Would the citizens of a Republic tolerate the statist manipulations of the Administration acceded to by Congress? Would they tolerate an illegal war based on falsehoods and manipulations? One cannot imagine the virtuous citizens of a Republic tolerating such (those who hold to Jefferson's ideal of Republican virtue.) Now the managed citizens of a mass democracy who are attuned to "voting" on which prepackaged performer in presented to them is "best", that's a different story.
Now I'm getting wistful . . .
The real entertainment of this election will be when the bi-racial guy who was raised by a single mother on food stamps turns into an "elite".
watch for it....
I can't believe you waste your time on this show. Did someone hijack you blog?
Can we get back to the Death and stuff? If it were not for American Idol, the WWE, desperate Housewives and televised sports, America might actually be a great country.
Anyone who can spend an hour watching idol and not gouging out their eyes with a spoon is an imbecile.
Dr. Cole? Are you there? I checked in to see if you had any insight on the Lebanon power-sharing agreement signed today, and instead I find this. Are you analyzing American Idol in the context of the reality show of our broken electoral system, or is it the other way around?
As current sociological debate in American society goes, not a bad observation that we're recapitulating a lot of the arguments in the political arena on TV shows. Though I'd point to 'Dancing with the Stars' and 'Survivor' as just as reflective of the debate...that race is more passé than gender.
As for political analogy, the 1976 primaries and general election seem a lot better of a fit. Why Obama supporters insist on denying the fit (I mean, Jimmy Carter is so obviously Obama's other 'mentor').... Well, it's obvious why that's so.
I think it great that Dr Cole uses his blog to write such a fine comparison and contrast essay to illustrate the bankruptcy of US electoral politics. It reminded me of Doc Brown's line from Back to the Future explaining the how/why 2-bit actor Reagan was elected president--He has to look good in the TV age.
I thought todays post was interesting. Politics is not a box that's completely separate from culture. Like it or not folks, American Idol is American pop culture. Analysis of politics in the context of pop culture can shed light into some of what's at play as far as the mindset of the population.
PS -- Lighten up people.
Nice to see a little reflection in the writing this week.
I am curious what, if anything, was sold as information to the ancient Greeks and Romans. You know those elite groups of people who influenced the outcomes of major advances of thought and commerce.
Did Cesar pass on false information about the moors in order to attack them? Did "the street" really understand the need to maintain a republic's determined drive? Were the Crusades only about religion? Was the Caliphite honest with the far reaches, or was there a different message to them, than the citizens in Baghdad?
Would it be right to say that the citizens of Rome (or DC) were in touch with their respective communities outside of Rome?
Could we as a civil society back then, ask the representative to not allow 30 ships to sail across the Med. to attack a harbor?
I think we might be just as disappointed with the decisions that were (or are) made.
Disappointment and disagreement will never be eliminated.
If only our system for choosing a President had the integrity of American Idol! At least that is a contest in which all the candidates start on a level playing field, and are judged primarily, if not solely, by the criteria that are most relevant to the position (in this case vocal skill, range, and "star quality" or appeal). And while there is some punditry (the judges), anyone who is interested can review the candidates performance for themselves. (I would bet most people who hold an opinion about our political candidates have never actually heard or read an entire speech by the candidates in their own words.)
Post a Comment
<< Home