Sanchez asks Goldfarb a Question
CNN's Rick Sanchez asks McCain campaign flack Michael Goldfarb to give specifics when he claims that Barack Obama pals around with antisemites; Goldfarb crashes and burns.
Some have criticized Sanchez for stipulating that Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi is antisemitic for the sake of the argument; but I saw the whole thing and Sanchez points out at the end that Khalidi and his supporters would challenge the characterization in the first place.
(People like Michael Goldfarb define antisemitism as disagreeing with the Zionist Far Right.)
Incidentally, Joe Klein's defense of Khalidi started a controversy over whether the term 'antisemite' also refers to Arabs. The glib answer that the term was invented in the 19th century specifically for Jews ignores the history of writing about 'Aryans' and 'Semites,' in which many European thinkers did in fact group 'Semites' (i.e. speakers of Semitic languages such as Arabic and Hebrew, though the Europeans racialized them) together. French commentators on Algeria in the 1860s spoke of the lethargy and fanaticism of Semites in general versus the dynamic Aryans. They intended both North African Arabs and North African Jews. Ernest Renan was one such thinker, and he certainly saw both Jews and Arabs as inferior Semites together. Faced with the problem that early Arab-Islamic civilization made great advances in science, Renan castigated Semitic Arabs as unoriginal and argued that early Islamic science actually was developed by the Aryan Iranians (Iranians speak an Indo-European language for the most part, and so were coded by Renan and his contemporaries as a kind of Aryan). Arthur Comte de Gobineau, a major theorist of Semitic and Aryan race, also saw the Iranians as the good Muslims because they were Aryans (he was French ambassador in Tehran for a while).
It would be nice if these debates on Israel and antisemitism attended to the history of European racial thought toward the Arabs that were colonized, a major arena for the development of the Aryan/Semitic dichotomy that rightwing Zionists want us to ignore.

|
Facebook





10 Comments:
ref The N.Y. Times : “ John McCain! Not Hussein! ”
FYI, this is one of the latest crowd-chants at Sarah Palin campaign appearances.
“After the rally in Florida ended, two of the people leading the chant explained why they did so :
“Because it rhymes,” said Shirley Mitten, 64, a volunteer at a pregnancy center and a resident of Brooksville, Fla.
She said she does not know if Mr. Obama is a Muslim. “He says he’s not, but we have no way of knowing,” Ms. Mitten said.
Her husband, John A. Mitten, 64, took credit for starting the chant. “I was trying to get it going!” he said. “I just do not want Obama to be elected.”
Mr. Mitten said he could not trust Mr. Obama because of his past association with William Ayers, the 1960’s radical, and because of his relationship with the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. He also pointed out that Mr. Obama’s father was a Muslim.
The middle name Hussein, he said, added to the suspicion. “I guess Obama was named after Saddam Hussein,” he said.”
America, The Whole World Is Watching. . .
On a subsequent Sanchez segment the unnamed was named--the Rev Jeremiah Wright. Was Michael Goldfarb only being a good McCain flack by complying with McCain's wishes that Wright be kept out of the discourse?
Of course there is the little matter of whether Wright is actually an "anti-Semite" as Goldfarb defines it.
http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2008/10/us-media-lies-and-political-propaganda.html
October 29, 2008
US media lies and political propaganda. Sometimes you have direct experience with the US media that only confirms the perception that they--all of them: liberal and conservative alike--can't be trusted especially on Middle East issues. I woke up today to news coverage regarding that dinner which Obama attended in honor of Rashid Khalidi. Rashid has been described this week as "PLO spokesperson", "PLO functionary", "PLO official", "Palestinian activist", "adviser to Yasser Arafat", etc. Rashid was my teacher and adviser at the American University of Beirut from 1978 until 1982. And he had no official capacity with the PLO whatever. He left Lebanon and came to US in 1983: the same year I came to the US. He came to Georgetown as a visiting professor and I came as a graduate student.
-- As'ad AbuKhalil
Goldfarblunget fairly confirms what's afoot here, not only with this particular smear, but with Ayres, Wright, etc. No actual incriminating connections, just a few dots, with the viewer actually being asked to fill in the relationships. If there was anything more to it, McPalin would have provided the details long ago, considering their poll numbers. Strictly guilt-by-association - the buzzword "terrorist" serving the same purpose as "savings-and-loan" did in '92 for Whitewater (whatever that was). Astonishing that anyone would even buy this scheiß, but anyone that would buy into "Joe the Plumber" is low-information indeed.
Here's the link to the followup - (from the link on your own video)- a great discussion on the leaps constantly made to call someone "antisemitic"
http://www.hopelessgeek.com/files/hg/Whoa.jpg
Then what shall we call people who hate Jews but do not hate Arabs? Or who hate Jews regardless of their feelings about Arabs? I've seen "anti-Jewish" used to avoid this semantic issue.
http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2008/10/thomas-friedman.html
October 31, 2008
Thomas Friedman. I know no one with more political and moral cowardice than Thomas Friedman. Here is a man who wholeheartedly supported Bush's wars, only to criticize the war when public opinion shifted. Here is a man who was a cheerleader for unregulated savage capitalism, only to offer criticisms of Wall Street when public opinion turned against Wall Street. And Thomas Friedman knew Rashid Khalidi (in Beirut and here in the US) well and yet he would not speak out to correct the record about what is being said about Rashid.
-- As'ad AbuKhalil
RE: People like Michael Goldfarb define antisemitism as disagreeing with the Zionist Far Right.
Goldfarb isn't the only one -- it's US policy.
"The distinguishing feature of the new anti-Semitism is criticism of Zionism or Israeli policy that—whether intentionally or unintentionally—has the effect of promoting prejudice against all Jews by demonizing Israel and Israelis and attributing Israel’s perceived faults to its Jewish character."
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/102301.pdf
This is the same Michael Goldfarb who lied about Pvt. Beauchamp.
http://daltonator.net/durandal/blog/?p=154
I should like to draw attention to a relatively extensive Comment that yesterday I placed here
http://www.juancole.com/2008/10/mccain-racism-hypocrisy-on-khalidi.html#comments
which, since the entry was archived soon afterwards (in the October archive), may not have been seen by some (my Comment was addressed to "skeptonomist and other interested individuals").
BF.
Post a Comment
<< Home