Right Wing Sweeps Israel;
Racialist Avigdor Lieberman Kingmaker
Two State Solution Dead, Challenge to Obama
The outcome of the Israeli election has sounded the death knell for the two-state solution. There are not 61 votes for it in the new Knesset of 120 seats. A good 64 of the just-elected and/or re-elected Members of Parliament favor accelerated Israeli colonization of the West Bank and oppose Palestinian statehood. Most militant of all is Avigdor Lieberman, a former bouncer from Moldova who has risen in Israeli politics on a platform of racial hatred for Israeli-Palestinians (20% of the population), whom he has urged be "executed" or made to take loyalty oaths, stripped of their citizenship and possibly transferred to the Palestine Authority.
With Lieberman emerging as kingmaker in the new government, logically speaking, there are only three other plausible future relationships of Israel and the Palestinians:
1. Apartheid, with Israeli citizens dominating stateless Palestinians and controlling their borders, land, water and air. Apartheid would be accelerated under Lieberman's baleful influence. Over time, this outcome would break down, since it will be unacceptable to the rest of the world over the coming decades).
2. Expulsion. The Israelis could try to violently expel the Palestinians (and possibly Israeli-Palestinians as well), creating a massive new wave of refugees in Jordan or Egypt's Sinai. (This option would almost certainly end the peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan and might well push the Arab states into the arms of Iran, creating a powerful anti-Israel military coalition and a huge set of threats to the United States.)
3. One State. The Israelis could be forced over time, by economic and technological boycotts, to grant citizenship to the Palestinians of the occupied territories.
Some Neoconservatives have proposed that Jordan could take back part of the West Bank and Egypt could take back the Gaza Strip. However, the Jordanian and Egyptian regimes will absolutely not do so, leading back to option (2) above. Jordan's government is based on the East Bank, Bedouin-origin population and has anxieties about the 60 percent of the population that is already of Palestinian origin. Egypt's relatively secular elites are afraid of Muslim radicalism and would not want to have Hamas become part of Egypt. Both Egypt and Jordan bought into the Arab League position that the PLO is the only legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, and they cannot go against this principle without enormous trouble, even from their own populations, who engaged in huge protests during the recent Gaza war against these governments continuing to have diplomatic relations with Israel.
Since President Obama sent out George Mitchell to attempt to kickstart the peace process and get back on track to a two-state solution, both have now had the rug pulled out from under tham by an Israeli public moving to the far right.
Despite the vote tallies being in, it still is not clear who will form the next government in Israel.
Estimates of the seats won by leading parties in the Israeli elections pointed to a huge shift rightward.
Kadima: 28
Likud: 27
Beitenu: 15
Labor: 13
Arabs 9
According to AFP N. America service, Kadima leader Tzipi Livni said, "Today the people have chosen Kadima . . ." She called on Binyamin Netanyahu of the Likud Party to join in a government of national unity (with herself as prime minister). It may be sort of like when Hillary Clinton offered Obama vice president.
Livni's problem is that if she tries for a right-of-center coalition with the left, she can only get 47 seats. The 9 Arab representatives would not formally join her coalition and now hate her because she was among the leaders of the great Gaza Massacre.
Last week, the Arab Members of the Knesset (parliament) let her have it:
' Livni will not be able to count on the support of the three Arab factions, whose MKs are still upset at her for her role in Operation Cast Lead and for saying in December that in the event of the formation of a Palestinian state, the national aspirations of Israeli Arabs "lie elsewhere."
"What Livni said about us is worse than Lieberman," United Arab List-Ta'al MK Ahmed Tibi said on Saturday night. "That's why we won't recommend to Peres that Livni form a government."
Hadash chairman Muhammad Barakeh said that "Tzipi Livni is not an option for us and neither is Barak or Netanyahu. I don't see us recommending someone who supported the war."
Kadima officials responded that such speculation did not matter, because the factions would reconsider their views if Livni won the election. '
But Kadima leaders may hope that the Arabs will vote with them because they have no place else togo. (Israel is 20% Arab, which should yield 24 seats in the Knesset, but only 9 were apparently elected, down from 12. Attempts were made to disqualify some Arab parties from running, but the Supreme Court struck them down)
Even if the Arabs changed their minds and tacitly supported Livni, that still only gets her, de facto, to 56. But she would need at least 61 to form a government and govern, meaning she'd have to attract at least one small rightwing party into her coalition. But that party would then have a veto because its defection would cause the government to fall. Livni said, at least, that she wanted to stop the Israeli settlement of the West Bank and even move some of the more exposed settlers back to Israel, by force if necessary. None of the small rightwing parties that might join her government and get her over 61 would accept this platform.
CBS explains Livni's difficulties going forward.
The USG Open Source Center reports on press reaction to the election outcome in Israel:
' Israel: Large Rightist Bloc Seen Impeding Livni; Peres To Meet Factions Next Week
Israel -- OSC Summary
Tuesday, February 10, 2009 . . .
Attila Somfalvi reports at 2054 GMT in Tel Aviv Ynetnews in English, a centrist news site operated by the Yedi'ot Media Group: "Although exit poll results are in, President Shimon Peres will only meet with Knesset factions at the beginning of next week in order to determine which party head will lead the formation of a new government coalition. The full count of votes -- including those of foreign representatives and soldiers -- is expected to be completed no earlier than Thursday afternoon. As such, Peres announced that discussions as to who should lead coalition-building would only begin next week.
"According to Israeli law, the creation of a coalition government is granted to the head of the faction who has the greatest chance of forming a coalition -- in other words, the one with the greatest chance of securing positive support from other factions. Given this fact, it is unclear from exit polls which party leader should be given this task. While Qadima Chairwoman Tzipi Livni appears to have won the elections (securing 28 to 30 seats, according to various polls,) Likud Chairman Binyamin Netanyahu lags behind by only two mandates. More importantly, the exit polls show that right-wing parties will secure over 61 mandates -- thus easily allowing for the potential creation of a right-wing coalition. Moreover, Livni has a troubled history with coalition construction. In October, after winning the Qadima primaries held pursuant to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's resignation, Livni tried and failed to set up a coalition government, leading to the call for early elections." '
End/ (Not Continued)

|
29 Comments:
Two Jews three opinions
You say that option 2, expulsion of Palestinians would push the Arab states into Iran's arms "creating a powerful anti-Israel military coalition and a huge set of threats to the United States". Okay, I understand how that is a threat to Israel but is it necessarily a threat to the US? Not unless we continue our incredibly stupid policy of supporting whatever atrocity Israel commits. If we condemn Israel and walk away it costs us nothing and shields us from the blowback of their racism toward their neighbors and Arab citizens. It's time that politicians here began showing some courage and leadership. We need leadership that puts America's interests first.
Nothing changes dramatically with this election.There never was any two state solution, except in the mind of "Jimmy of Arabia" and other such Pollyannas. The outcome of the election simply makes obvious intent slightly more obvious. There is no way the supreme deity of Zion will be satisfied with infidels walking around in he midst of the chosen people, bowing to their false gods with impunity. And what WILL Obama do when Zionist bombers breach Iraqi air space on their way to Tehran?
Again, you can stop feeling sorry for Obama anytime now, Cole. He can send the Israeli voting public a wakeup call anytime he wants by cutting off military aid to Israel. But instead he has made it very, very clear that he supports any Israeli policy, however brutal it may be.
And please, don't make the false comparison between withholding military aide from Israel and the way the US, EU and Israel doled out collective punishment to the Palestinians for electing Hamas. No one is suggesting that we arrest and assassinate Israeli leaders (they should face World Court crimes, but that would be an open, public, legal and non-unilateral procedure); no one is suggesting that we withhold taxes and other legitimate moneys from the Israeli government; no one is suggesting that we withhold necessities of life from the people of Israel, or that we arm and fund a separate faction in the Israeli government.
All Obama has to do is stop providing military aid, stop providing diplomatic cover, and recall weapons provided to Israel that they have abused in order to escalate conflict, flagrantly defying US law.
If Obama refuses to do that, then he is simply complicit with Israel's fascistic government.
For many of us who try to keep up with events in the middle east, Israeli elections are about democratically choosing their favorite war criminal. Who would you like to be your next Führer: Goebbels or Ribbentrop?
Óscar Palacios
Mexico City
So by the Israeli way of thinking every Jew in Israel is fair game. Their lives and property are no longer valuable as they voted for religiously inspired extremists and so collective punishment is in order.
Or does that only apply to the people of Gaza for voting for Hamas?
Three comments:
(1) The only thing certain about the new Israeli government is that it will be weak, and will be unable to take any bold new initiatives--either for peace or for expansion of existing programs like settlements. I.e., more of the same. It will be interesting to see what Mitchell/Clinton/Obama do about trying to move Israel along. But I don't see much hope for progress from either side...or any side if you consider the two Palestinian factions.
(2) "the Jordanian and Egyptian regimes will absolutely not" take back the West Bank or Gaza Strip: All Jews who left or were expelled from Arab countries were immediately taken in by Israel. Why won't Arab countries take in Palestinians who left or were expelled from Israel?
(3) "Gaza Massacre:" The UN has already admitted that the "Israeli attack on a UN school" never happened. Maybe the "Gaza Massacre" will turn out to be as fictional as the "Jenin Massacre" a few years ago.
A very sobering thought that Israel's lurch, today, to the extreme right will ensure the continuance of the conflict by the expansion of the settlements and further restrictions upon the freedom of movement of over 2 million Palestinians. Furthermore, an extreme right-wing government will eventually be forced to use its nuclear arsenal to secure its position against militant opposition to its hegemony in the Middle East, by Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and also Egypt. That coming nuclear conflict will spread to Europe and one has to wonder as to what drives the US and the UK to support an Israeli policy - the horrific consequences of which will one day engulf us all.
The election in Israel show with complete clarity what has been increasingly evident to me for months or even a couple of years. Israel has become a ferocious imperial state and is betraying a founding idealistic or hopefully idealistic heritage.
There is not even a peace party worth mentioning in Israel, only parties of war.
The proximity of this election to Olmert-Livni's attack on Gaza was a lethally cynical calculation. Which of the war parties would see the greatest benefit was not certain, but a shift right was pretty predictable. Even the most questionable of wars can move voters to feel threatened, to vote that fear, or fear to vote. 2004 comes to mind, and the 'afghan surge' of our new president, and his war cabinet.
There's no question that Nuclear Israel's election results presage funding for ever more settlers occupying the W. Bank, and a dimming of any short term prospects of two states based on the 1967 borders. But it should help focus Prof. Coles readers on our own country's part in Israel's war of territorial expansion. And specifically the near takeover of the Democractic Party by an ardent pro-zionist faction.
Rahm Emanuel, son of an Irgun terrorist, handpicked pro-war congressional candidates for our last two elections, and now answers the phone at the WH. Hillary and Obama both know where the money is in US politics, and enthusiastiaclly beat the 'Israel First' drum. Biden declares 'I am a zionist' on Utube, for all to see.
Our problem is here at home, the lack of effective action and activism, of any program really, on the progressive side. We need to take a look at Jimmy Carter's mission, and get real about the decades of effort that change takes.
60 years of territorial expansion has to be recognized here in the US, and the need for us stop funding it. Jewish immigrants and Palestine's native people are best served by a negotiated peace.
Let's get back to Cole's suggestion of a PAX PAC, to build intellectual capital, and offset AIPAC's ability to pour overwhelming attacks on any US politician or newscaster that questions the zionist agenda. Let's take note of the dustup that Helen Thomas caused by even asking the question: Does Obama know that there is a nuclear state already at the heart of the ME arms race? Until our President can openly talk about how our policy acknowledges the salient military fact in that region, we need to keep asking that question.
We have a right and a duty to demand that the officers sworn to defend our Constition formulate our ME policy independent of the Eretz Israel political lobby on our shores.
Joe Biden did predict that there would be a foreign policy challenge to the Obama administration in its first 6 months in the office. It seems that Israeli election just delivered that promise.
1. "...a platform of racial hatred for Israeli-Palestinians (20% of the population), whom he has urged be "executed" or made to take loyalty oaths, stripped of their citizenship and possibly transferred to the Palestine Authority" ---
That is a deliberate lie. Lieberman suggests that every citizen of Israel that refuses to take a loyalty oaths to Israel (like Americans do when they are granted citizenship) must change his/her status to permanent resident. No talk of execution or forced expulsion, and you know that.
2. "One state" is not an option - unless you want to finish Israel off. It will be just matter of short time before Palestinians outnumber Jews and we will witness another Holocaust. We all see that Jews allow Palestinians live and prosper among them as long as they do not kill people; how long a Jew would stay alive in Palestinian village? Why you and your friends want so badly to see the whole nation eliminated off is beyond my understanding.
Americans should not now kid themselves. They are funding an religion and ethnic based apartheid state. Turn off American taxpayer money and the Israeli government would get begin behaving very reasonably very quickly. Follow the money. The Israeli State has morphed into what it was established in reaction against and could not survive without the now bankrupt American taxpayers. The U.S. can't afford Israel anymore.
Why won't Arab countries take in Palestinians who left or were expelled from Israel?
If you had been paying close attention to the events in Iraq, one you would have noticed that the Arab world is not one huge monolith. There are substantial differences not just among Arab states but within Arab states as well. It is not so simple to say: let Egypt or some other Arab state take the Palestinians. Many Lebanese see themselves as Phoenicians; many Iraqis, excluding the Kurds, see themselves a Babylonians; many Libyans see themselves as Africans. In addition, there is also the Shiite / Sunni divide. Plus the Arab world has a large Christian population. These are just a few examples of the heterogeneity of the Arab world.
"Gaza Massacre:" The UN has already admitted that the "Israeli attack on a UN school" never happened. Maybe the "Gaza Massacre" will turn out to be as fictional as the "Jenin Massacre" a few years ago.
Look at the numbers. Roughly 1300 Palestinians were killed during the Gaza invasion while 13 Israelis, 10 of whom were soldiers, were killed. Of those 10 soldiers, many of them died due to friendly fire. How else would you define a massacre?
"Gaza Massacre:" The UN has already admitted that the "Israeli attack on a UN school" never happened. Maybe the "Gaza Massacre" will turn out to be as fictional as the "Jenin Massacre" a few years ago.
[This is not true.]
President Obama wants a two-state solution. Now that Bush is no longer in the White House, I suspect the Israelis are about to be reminded that Israel is a client state of the US, and not the other way around. I predict that the new PM is going to prefer a two-state solution to an insolvent one-state solution. Just a guess.
True, Lieberman may be a racist. But he favors the two-state solution. So, his party would be a natural coalition partner for Kadima. In fact, his position is closer to Kadima than to Likud. A coalition based on Kadima, Beitenu, and Labor seems completely tenable.
Behnam
The basic principle is simple. Whoever is the next PM, the US must have assurances that the next government recognizes Palestine's right to exist, that it renounces violence, and that it will adhere to previous agreements. A unity government that will be a true partner for peace for the Palestinians should be able to give us these assurances. Failing that, some unpleasant things begin to happen for Israel. Lieberman may be due for a Sistah Souljah Moment, for starters. Etc., etc. Friends don't let friends kill children.
You Colies are working on the wrong end. No wonder you keep losing.
Get the Palestinians to accept a two state solution and demonstrate good faith by stopping the constant attacks on Israel. Stop the emo queening about the poor Palestinians who were stupid enough to elect a terrorist organization to represent them in Gaza. Educate them to realize that their day of playing on the world's sympathies, living off welfare from the world's patsies, and being rebuilt and subsidized to kill isn't working.
They are losers, following a fundamentally flawed strategy of hatred, murder, and inevitable defeat. They need to do what numerous other groups in the world have done: quit fighting, take what you can, and build a future for your children.
I am not Israeli, and not a Jew. I used to feel great sympathy for the Palestinians and took their side almost invariably. After 40 years of watching this nonsense, I changed my mind.
IMO the very worst moral reprobates are those who are whining about Israel, and sitting in comfortable homes in Europe & the USA, encouraging the Palestinians to continue to resist. They have turned two generations into cannon fodder and gained not a square inch of land back. Shame on all of you. You are scum for encouraging this endless conflict instead of teaching the Palestinians to accept their losses and build a future with what they have. The Scots and Welch don't live a bad life, and they don't blow themselves up in London because they learned to adapt. The Palestinians are smart enough and capable enough to do the same, if they are encouraged to do so instead of being fed the romantic dreams of those living far from the conflict.
DaMav
Your breakdown/tally of the Arab parties' gains is wrong or, at the very least, misleading. In the last Knesset, Raam/Taal had 4 seats; Balad had 3; and Hadash had 3. That's 10 seats total. So far, for this election the tally is Raam-Taal, 4; Balad, 3; and Hadash, 4. That's 11 total. While Hadash has had Jewish MKs and is technically communist, it is usually counted as an Arab party, certainly by the Israeli press.
So where does the "only nine were elected, down from 12" come from? Are you counting all Palestinian-Israeli MKs regardless of party? Or only those in the so-called Arab parties? Either way, it doesn't seem to work out to the numbers you have here.
"I am not Israeli, and not a Jew. I used to feel great sympathy for the Palestinians and took their side almost invariably. After 40 years of watching this nonsense, I changed my mind."
Whatever you are, you are a vile person.
Hadash is a Jewish-Arab secular Party.
Q. Why won't Arab countries take in Palestinians who left or were expelled from Israel?
A. If you had been paying close attention to the events in Iraq, one you would have noticed that the Arab world is not one huge monolith. There are substantial differences not just among Arab states but within Arab states as well. It is not so simple to say: let Egypt or some other Arab state take the Palestinians. Many Lebanese see themselves as Phoenicians; many Iraqis, excluding the Kurds, see themselves a Babylonians; many Libyans see themselves as Africans. In addition, there is also the Shiite / Sunni divide. Plus the Arab world has a large Christian population. These are just a few examples of the heterogeneity of the Arab world.
___
Stuck with the surname McCloskey, naturally I think of myself as a wolfhound on Mondays and Wednesdays and Friday, and as an extinct elk the rest of the week. So your Phoenicians and Pharaoh-ites and Babylonians are mere neo-mushrooms sprung up overnight compared to MY folks! (I'll allow that your Africans have a respectably long pedigree, though.)
Neither as deer nor as hound, however, do I understand the above exchange. The obvious CliffsNotes version of it would be "The Arab states are too ethnically and religiously diverse to admit any large and potentially destabilizing number of Palestinians flushed out of Palestine." That formula might actually have applied to Lebanon, I suppose, before the fiends in question were (mostly) reflushed thence. Since 1970, though, it does not obviously apply anywhere at all.
Well, but I'm game! Why not ship 'em all to the environs of Brave New Baghdád, where they can freely fantasize that they still live five hundred kilometers [*] away under Hamás, right next to Ba‘this who pretend to live three millennia away under Hammurabi, in that same happy postinternationalzonal Land of Oz where Twelvers recite "Every day is ‘Ashúrae, every place is Karbalá’!"! (The double displacement comes to one hundred klicks off in space and 1369 (lunar) years in time, unless I miscalculate.)
Speaking of lunacy, I never actually heard anybody suggest than an asylum would become unmanageable if too many different types of delusion were brought together in one place, but it does sound vaguely reasonable primâ facie . . . .
Mais que sçay-je?
Happy days.
[*] What's gone wrong with Googlemaps? It won't allow the line to be anchored! "Everything solid melts into air."
"The Palestinians are smart enough and capable enough to do the same, if they are encouraged to do so instead of being fed the romantic dreams of those living far from the conflict."
You too obviously live far from the conflict and are espousing some pretty romantic dreams for a nation of people you apparently no longer have any sympathy for.
Take your ignorant hypocrisy elsewhere.
Yes, we must accept "good" overlords, as defined by whom? Neither you nor I know what it feels like to be a Palestinian, but we know that our wonderful liberal-capitalist American society has committed crimes against non-whites thruout its history. And I think it will continue to in the future, because the retaliation by the minorities has not been enough to deter whites. You probably think the redskins would have been better off if they had all surrendered to the Pilgrims in 1620, but maybe they would have been better off if they'd kept fighting after Wounded Knee. The people of Vietnam and Algeria accepted horrendous costs to resist French colonization, and they're not going away. The Irish and South Africans have defeated colonists after centuries of subjugation.
But to put it in a way you can't slough off behind racist codewords, how would you feel if an advanced future China felt obliged to ensure the survival of its people by creating colonies in a North America too weakened by its past screwups to resist? Would you as an American not commit any and every offense to stop it? I sure would.
I think you only like it when whitey is on top of these colonization scams.
This election has shown once and for all that the Israelis have no intention of complying with UN Security Council Resolutions 242, etc. Arafat agreed to the Arab Peace Plan in 2002 which is still on the table. If Israel and the US had endorsed it then there would have been no need for the Iraq War or any war with Iran and we would be $3 trillion richer. Indeed, by removing all our troops from Muslim lands and with Arab/Israeli peace, there would be no need for our so-called war on terror either. It's time to dissociate ourselves from Israel and bring our troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan. The USSR went bankrupt in Afghanistan trying to spread Communism; we've gone bankrupt trying to spread Zionism. Enough already.
"Whatever you are, you are a vile person."
have you read some of the comments here before slamming this guy for his opinion? some folks here need to do a reset & stop hyperventilating. things are never as bad as they seem. there will be a two state solution and it will occur during the next year years. and fyi, israel remains a democracy and as such, reflects the fears/hopes of its populace. with hamas depicting jews as offspring of pigs and apes and threatening israel with destruction, is it really surprising that israel's electorate was attracted by the right's message?
come off it. jeeesh
Israel is losing the battle for the hearts and minds of the world. Imagine for one moment the US Congress debating the expulsion of its black population (at 14% a lot less than the 20% of Israel's Arab population). How can Israelis who support this expulsion nonsense claim to be any better than European or American skinheads that also feel threatened by population changes. The discrimination in Israel against its Arab citizens smacks of the Jim Crow laws in the US during the 50's. Israel's Arab population is denied equal access to education, employment and migration. The Israeli policy of fencing in the Palestinians in the Gaza strip smacks of the Nazi policy of fencing in the Jews of the Warsaw Ghetto during WWII, and resembles the racist policies of the Apartheid South Africa. Israel has for years subsidized and unofficially encouraged the establishment of Jewish settlements in the West Bank in violation of international accords. I understand Israeli anger when rockets are fired from the Gaza Strip and innocent civilians die. And I understand that the Islamic extremists in the Gaza Strip use civilians as a human shield. But where is the common sense in "weeding a garden with a bulldozer" and killing thousands of innocent Palestinians in response. Every innocent Palestinian that dies has family and that family become sworn enemies of Israel for life - future suicide bombers and the senseless cycle of violence goes on. Religious extremists and zealots of every variety are the scourge of the earth. Religion is supposed to promote tolerance, forgiveness and the brotherhood of man, instead what religion promotes is intolerance and war. Marx was a idealist dreamer that spawned the horror of communism, but he got one thing right.....religion really is the opiate of the people.
The commenter DaMav at 7:11am is a GIYUS operative. Anytime you see a post that follows the formula "I used to support the Palestinians but they are so hopelessly violent that I don't care what happens to them anymore" then you can be assured you are reading the pabulum of a zionist operative.
Israel is still on track to be gone by 2025. Probably sooner at this point (and the end can't come soon enough).
Post a Comment
<< Home