Karzai Backs down on Key Elements of Law on Shiite Personal Status

Posted on 04/17/2009 by Juan

The Afghan government says that it will amend a recently passed law that puts Afghanistan’s Shiites under the law of their branch of Islam for personal status purposes. The law allowed marital rape and detracted from the rights of women in other ways, as well.

The government’s pledge to amend the law so as to forbid marital rape misses the point. Afghanistan has a civil code on personal status, and all citizens should be under it. If the state farms out personal status law to a Shiite court, then a conservative interpretation of Shiite law (sharia) will become the de facto law of the land for Shiites. Moreover, there is the issue of the state creating the Shiites as a separate group not under national law.

Some 300 to 500 women had demonstrated in Kabul on Wednesday, drawing a larger counter-demonstration of men who support the law.

AP reports on the reaction to the women’s demonstration, which included pelting them with stones.

The conservative Persian-language Afghan press dismissed the women as largely local school students joined by a few prominent outside agitators, who were challenging the authority of the Hawza or Shiite religious establishment. In fact, the demonstrators consisted of women’s rights activists from all over the country.

The issue should not be construed as a couple of objectionable provisions of Shiite Islamic law, but the desirability in a democracy of having a uniform civil code for all citizens. Karzai is widely thought to have signed the bill to pander to Shiite clerics, in a bid to attract votes from the Shiite minority, some 22 percent of the population. Karzai is contesting a presidential election in August.

Updated link See for controversies about the US in Afghanistan William Astore at Tomdispatch, just out.

End/ (Not Continued)

0 Retweet 0 Share 2 StumbleUpon 0 Printer Friendly Send via email

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off | Print

Comments are closed.

  • Juan Cole

    Juan Cole

    Welcome to Informed Comment, where I do my best to provide an independent and informed perspective on Middle Eastern and American politics.

    Informed Comment is made possible by your support. If you value the information and essays, I make available and write here, please take a moment to contribute what you can.

  • IC Destinations



  • Keep up with Informed Comment at:

  • Donate to Global Americana Institute

    Donate to the Global Americana Institute to support the translation into Arabic of books about America.
  • Friends and Interlocutors:

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    • Iraq Comes to Syria (5)
      • JTMcPhee: The physics of politics: Legitimacy = (decency + stability)/(corruption*violenc e).
      • joe from Lowell: No, he meant “psychological warfare.” The audience for that story (if Prof. Cole is...
    • Omar Khayyam (23) (11)
      • Q: The fish is asking if there is life after death (will water return.) Khayyam is very clever, although he believes...
      • Barnett Rubin: It means: Oh take the cash and let the credit go, Nor heed the warning of a distant drum.
    • Omar Khayyam (24) (6)
      • Vanessa Gezari: I love this, Juan!
      • Q: Doings (the breaths that is taken) are real. Feelings( unbelief, religion, doubt, certainty) are appearances, only...
  • Archives

  • Categories