Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Sunday, June 07, 2009

OSC: Pakistani Editorialists Respond to Obama

The USG Open Source Center translates Pakistani editorials from the Urdu press reacting to President Obama's address in Cairo to the Muslim world.

Pakistan: Urdu Press Roundup on Address of US President at Cairo University
The following is a roundup of excerpts from editorials on the address of US President Barack Obama at a university in Cairo in which he said that the United States wants new relationship with the Islamic world and that it was not in a state of war with Islam but against extremism, published in the 6 June editions of 10 Urdu dailies.
Pakistan -- OSC Summary
Saturday, June 6, 2009
Document Type: OSC Summary

Maintaining that President Obama will have to come forward to solve the problems faced by the Islamic world for better relations with it, the editorial states: "If President Obama really wants to change the black and bloody face of the United States and intends to abandon current US behavior of enmity toward Muslims, he will have to take practical steps instead of giving advices and admonitions. He should not take Muslims as so simple and foolish that he can impress them with a single speech and they start considering the United States an Islam-friendly country and Obama their well-wisher. He should announce withdrawal of troops from Iraq and Afghanistan first for the improvement of relationship between the United States and Muslims."

Cont'd (click below or on "comments")

Ummat Editorial Says Followers of All Faiths Want Peace

Stressing the need of peaceful coexistence as enshrined in teachings of all religions, the editorial states: "The people of the Islamic world as well as Americans will have no difference with the ideas of President Obama because all religions of the world want to live in peace and tranquility. There is a small group ofpeople in power, which pits them against each other. No religion approves of hatred among human beings, hostility, and bloodshed. If all people follow the real teachings of their religions, this earth can become a cradle of peace, love, and prosperity."

Jasarat Editorial Terms Address as Jugglery of Words

Finding nothing special in the address of the US President, which was declared as an address to the Islamic world, the editorial comments: "Addressing Muslims across the world from a university in Cairo, President Barack Obama gave a message that the United States and Islam are not against each other and that he wants to open a new era of relationship with Muslims. To prove the sincerity of his intention and desire for reviving relationship between the United States and Muslims, he proposed a two-state solution of the Palestine problem. But he advised Israel and threatened Palestinians and HAMAS. There was nothing in therest of his address except jugglery of words."

Express Editorial Advises Obama To Act on His Words

Urging the US President to translate into action what he claimed in his address, the editorial says: "If we keep in mind the seeds of hatred sown by former US President Bush during his rule of eight years, we can say that President Obama’s speech was good, beyond any doubt. We believe that you (Obama) have trust in God and the holy Koran, and we acknowledge that you want to open, in all sincerity, a new era of relationship between the United States and the Islamic world. We also respect your desire that an independent and sovereign Palestinian state should be established. But for this, you will have to take the first step, i.e., to initiate implementing your beautiful and impressive words."

Mashriq Editorial Links End of Extremism With Resolution of Disputes

Emphasizing that extremism in the Islamic world cannot be exterminated, as President Obama has desired, until the major issues are resolved, the editorial says: "It will not be unjust to expect that President Obama's address can be made foundation for dialogue with Muslims across the world. The Islamic countries should join heads together to make preparations in this regard and draw up ajoint strategy under which they may lay the foundation of their relationship with Washington without compromising their Islamic and national dignity. There is a need to highlight the need that until the issues of Palestine, Kashmir, and Iraq are resolved, elimination of the tendency of extremism and militancy is impossible."

Jinnah Editorial Deplores Omission of Kashmir in Obama's Address

Lamenting that there was no mention of the important issue of Kashmir that has been threatening peace in this part of the world, the editorial says: "During his visit to Egypt, the US President made great attempt to create a soft corner for him and his country among Muslims. But how should we take the policy thatthe United States has been pursuing. He excluded the Kashmir issue from his entire address with great beauty. The obvious reason for this appears to be that he didn't want to run the risk of making India angry."

Aaj Kal Editorial Says Speech Message of Democracy

Dismissing the suggestions by detractors about the selection of venue for addressing Muslims, the editorial writes: "Objections were raised on the speech even before it was delivered. It was said that why he selected such a country where dilapidated dictator is thrusting him on his nation through fake referendum in which he gets some 90 percent votes. Since Obama was to make this speech income Arab country, what country should he have selected if tested on the touchstone of democracy? Why the critics don't say that what can be better than going to the heart of a society struggling for democracy and human rights togive a message of democracy."

Ausaf Editorial Demands Obama To Deliver Speech in Pakistan, Afghanistan

Stating that President Obama should visit Islamabad and Kabul to answer questions boggling the local minds, the editorial says: "Obama should deliver an address at Quaid-e-Azam University in Islamabad following his speech in Cairo University and give an assurance to the people fighting against the United States that his country does not believe in killing and bloodshed and that he wants to put an end toit. He should also deliver a speech at Kabul University and extend a hand of goodwill to the Pashtuns of Afghanistan. Obama will have to work hard to bridge the gulf of trust; otherwise the current wave of terrorism will sweep more areas."

Jang Editorial Claims Actions Speak Louder Than Words

Finding the sentiments expressed by the US President in his speech as encouraging, the editorial states: "The speech of President Obama is certainly appreciable because an acknowledgement has been made by the most powerful figure of the United States that the country is not up against Islam and Muslims and that it is only against extremism, in whatever manifestation it is. However, no sensible person will deny that impressive words cannot yield desired results until backed by will and power to act on them in letter and spirit. Therefore, until the United States takes concrete and positive steps to translate its sentiments and aspirations about Muslims and Islam into reality, chances of bridging the gap with the Islamic community will remain slim."

Khabrain Editorial Asks US To Abandon Unjust Policies

Claiming that the United States has an eye on the world's mineral and energy resources, the editorial says: "We have already pointed out in these lines that President Obama is coming to take something from the Arabs and not to give something to them. Anyhow, the words of the US President are welcoming. If only! He acted upon them. If the United States wants peace in the world, it will have to abandon its expansionist designs, lust for mineral and energy resources, and the religious prejudice."

3 Comments:

At 1:19 PM, Blogger Da' Buffalo Amongst Wolves said...

Off the top: "He should announce withdrawal of troops from Iraq and Afghanistan first for the improvement of relationship between the United States and Muslims."

Yeah... Sure!

A recent Tweet: The Privatization of 'Obama's War': Obama makes his diplomatic moves but the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan grind on as the percentage of "Contractors" continues to rise.

" According to new Pentagon statistics, in the second quarter of this year, there has been a 23 percent increase in the number of private security contractors working for the Pentagon in Iraq and a 29 percent hike in Afghanistan. In fact, outside contractors now make up approximately half of our forces fighting in the two countries.

"This means," according to Jeremy Scahill, author of the book, Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army, "there are a whopping 242,647 contractors working on these two U.S. wars.""

In full, Consortium News

Let's get something straight here.

NO ONE in the US is going to drive their Cadillac Escalade even 1 mile less to save an Iraqi, a Pakistani, or Afghan's life. As a matter of fact, the ability to drive a large vehicle or 'muscle car' has become quite the status symbol among certain (non-affluent) elements of American society.

I've said this before, and I'll say it again.

We AREN'T leaving the region until we've sucked every last drop of extractive resources out of it, get driven out, or the cost/benefit ratio becomes prohibitive... and on that last point, the C/B ratio may not even matter any more because we've made so many heavily armed enemies in the region, that we may just HAVE TO stay there and use what remains of the hydrocarbons we can get at to continue running our military on their oil in an ongoing colonial military posture just to have a first-line buffer against the people of the countries we've laid waste coming HERE to attack us... Again.

Sound pessimistic? I am.

You'd figure the American people would have learned something from the WTC attack... but I don't believe we have.

Rationalize, Deny, Think wishfully (that nothing of our conspicuously consumptive lifestyles will ever have to change)

 
At 3:25 PM, Blogger karlof1 said...

The Khabrain Editorial is quite correct, and the many observations that actins speak louder than words are shared by the vast majority. Many current acts by the US government prove Obama's words to be false as they point to escalation, not de-escalation, and have nothing to do with the fight against "extremeism." Such extremeism is in response to US Imperial actions, which suggest that the US Imperial actions must cease for some time before any decline in extremeism will be seen. But it is precisely this cause/effect relationship the US is unwilling or unable to see/comprehend. Based on past history, I expect no positive change in real as opposed to rhetorical US behavior.

 
At 9:04 PM, Blogger Da' Buffalo Amongst Wolves said...

karlof1, We're on the same page.

I just seriously doubt "...the US is unwilling or unable to see/comprehend...". The US (as a nation or individuals) can see and comprehend if they'd care to, but it's stomped down in the individual's subconscious by "Denial", a denial that their government is more than happy to pander to.

All one has to do is recall the fury President Jimmy Carter unleashed when he went on national TeeVee in a sweater during the petroleum 'crisis' of the 70s and simply asked everyone to turn down their thermostats.

The US infrastructure (and DEFINITELY CALIFORNIA'S whre I live) requires automobiles just to make it to those 3 part time jobs (or spouses working 1.5 ea) necessary to maintain some semblance of a mainstream American life in a country where the idea of lifelong employment at full time hours is just a distant nostalgic memory for most.

Dmitry Orlov @ Club Orlov compared the economic collapse of Russia and it's outcome to what he perceives to be the impending US economic collapse for energybulletin.net.

More @ energybulletin... It was originally a public presentation and there are graphic illustrations.

On his list of comparisons:

Russia: Few lost their homes because the government owns them. Relieving the residents from the potential of homelessness and when the government built those housing developments they made dang sure that there was adequate public transport available. IOW, no one found themselves homeless and/or without a way to get to whatever work was available.

I won't mention the US side of that comparison if the economic crunch continues... It's a no-brainer.

...and it's beginning to show:

One in Five US Children Sinking Into Poverty.
http://trunc.it/c13j

I blame that situation, and other acute economic conditions that are arising in the US, on the looting of the US treasury at the rate of over a million dollars a minute to prosecute the current crop of truly worthless wars, some of which are already spreading region-wide in Central Asia.

From Jane's: Militant attacks strike eastern Uzbekistan 03 June 2009

..and in other dysfunctional cultural ways in still ANOTHER of the 'stans-on-the-sidelines:

Dagestan interior minister assassinated 6 June, 2009

That incident looks like a 'mob' hit.

But closer to the regional insurgency 'bone' there's this. Also Dagestan:

"In recent months in Dagestan, one of the republics in the Caucasus near Chechnya and Ingushetia, the Russian government has banned the Wahhabi sect of Islam, and also Vakhabits and those who support the teachings of the late Turkish theologian Said Nursi." In full @ Sunday's Zaman

..and this piece saying the US should create an 'alliance' with Russia for the purpose of snuffing Islamic militant reaction to events in relatively nearby countries:

"Russia is exposed most directly in the North Caucasus (Chechnya, Dagestan, and other republics of the region) with a potential of it spreading to Tatarstan and other Muslim-populated regions, and via its allied regimes in Central Asia (Tajikistan, for one)." Arthur Khachikian June 5th, 2009, Partnership For A Secure America

Can't you just smell Jihad in the Dagestani air?

All in all, the last few US administrations have dragged us "Waist Deep" into the "Big Muddy", and now the "Big Fools" are saying "Move On" with the semantic payload of "Or Else you'll be living like a third world villager, with about the same level of personal safety"

OTOH, if our government keeps on keepin' on like this, we will be.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home