All the President’s Deniers

By Juan Cole | (Informed Comment) | – –

This week, we’ve seen a parade of Donald J. Trump’s far-right cabinet appointees attempting to tone themselves down (with help from pliant GOP senators) for the general public with half-truths and evasions. They were not challenged on some key issues. Rex Tillerson, CEO of ExxonMobil, didn’t admit his company’s complicity in fooling the public about the danger of climate change, e.g. In particular, Mike Pompeo for CIA got off amazingly lightly.

So here’s the problem. Trump is putting someone in charge of the Company who doesn’t trust the facts. When his exhaustive persecution of Hillary Clinton over the Benghazi attack of 2012 yielded conclusive findings that exonerated her, he wrote his own dissenting report. His report was a dark fantasy; he should leave that to horror writer Stephen King.

Pompeo was behind an attempt to undermine the CIA in Iraq by claiming that the success of the fight against Daesh (ISIS, ISIL) there had been exaggerated by the intelligence community. In fact, Daesh has been steadily rolled up and is now besieged in virtually its last Iraqi territorial bastion, of West Mosul.

Pompeo, of Wichita Kansas, who is in the back pocket of the dirty-carbon Koch brothers, is a major climate change denialist. Climate change is one of the big security challenges facing the US. How can a denialist deal with the refugee flows it will create, the damage to infrstructure it will do, the terrorism it might provoke?

Pompeo was asked by Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) if he would order the waterboarding of suspects by the Central Intelligence Agency if he were confirmed to lead it.

“Absolutely not,” he replied. “I will always comply with the law.”

Then he added, “I can’t imagine I would be asked by the president-elect or then president.”

So just close your eyes, Mike, and listen to Trump from Feb. 2015: “Don’t tell me it doesn’t work — torture works. Half these guys say ‘Torture doesn’t work’. Believe me, it works.”

Although Pompeo said he had voted for a law that banned waterboarding, what he actually voted for was banning torture; the trick is that he doesn’t define waterboarding as torture. In fact he has continued to advocate it and has slammed the Obama administration for not using it, so I think he wasn’t being entirely forthcoming here.

He wrote at his website in 2014, ““President Obama has continually refused to take the war on radical Islamic terrorism seriously—from ending our interrogation program in 2009 to trying to close Guantanamo Bay . . .”

What exactly does he mean by “ending our interrogation program”? By the way, Obama killed Osama Bin Laden; Pompeo didn’t.

Pompeo also caused a stir by arguing that Muslims must go around denouncing Muslim terrorism all the time or else they are “potentially complicit in these acts, and more importantly still, in those that may well follow.”

I can’t say how monstrous this is. Did Pompeo ever once stand up in Congress and denounce the terrorist actions of white supremacists, which are far more frequent and damaging than those of Muslims? And why is he comfortable joining an administration where Neofascist Steve Bannon is White House chief strategist? Maybe Pompeo is complicit?

Ironically, three white supremacists from Pompeo’s part of the country were busted in a plot to kill local Somali Muslims and to kill white officials and clergymen whom they saw as soft on Muslims. Some of Pompeo’s own political colleagues were in danger from these terrorists. So again, I ask. Did Pompeo denounce this group of white terrorists? If not, did he approve of their plans?

The CIA is in the business of having field officers recruit and run agents, including in the Muslim world. Will a Pompeo CIA really be good at gaining the trust of Muslims in the Middle East, if he thinks they are all terrorists?

Then there is Pompeo’s determination to go to war against Iran:

So you have to wonder whether someone who unfairly bashed the CIA for its successful work against Daesh in Iraq, who has alienated all America’s Muslim allies with his extremist Islamophobia, who denies the challenge of a rapidly changing climate, who lives in a fantasy world in which Hillary Clinton had any operational role at Benghazi, who favors waterboarding, and who doesn’t seem to have heard the speeches demanding torture given by his own prospective boss– and who has consistently failed to denounce terrorism by white supremacists– you have to wonder whether he can be successful at the helm of the CIA.

——–

Related video:

Sen. Kamala Harris questions Pompeo on climate change,

Shares 0

9 Responses

  1. what is left to say about how corrupt the 2 sided one party system of government that currently exists?

    in the video pompeo (who has a very weird affectation of looking down before making eye contact) clearly implies he not only disbelieves in climate change….but is closed minded to the issue.
    the best we can see as rebuttal…is a “thank-you”.

  2. This whole business is extremely undignified, to put it mildly. It used to be that one just shrugged one’s shoulders but I think it will now engender further erosion of blind European loyalty to US foreign policies this side of the water. Initially it is likely to be with Russia because economic sanctions are hurting Europeans and are in any event not a sensible way to resolve disputes, particularly those provoked by US actions; the Ukraine coup financed with 5 million US dollars, and the provocative build up of forces along Russia’s border, which evokes in many still vivid images of WWII. Of course there are other ingredients as well, like the economic model which is seen as a largely US construct and is patently harming millions. Once people start thinking like that they draw in a host of other bits of US policy that can, rightly or wrongly, be regarded in much the same way. Then we have the Israel/Palestine mess which everyone knows has been prolonged by US policy. Heaven knows what Obama was doing abstaining from resolution 2334 but Kerry has decided to attend the French organised conference in Geneva when he has but three days left in office because, …we don’t want to certainly see anything come up that attempts to impose a solution on Israel. Most Europeans think it’s high time to ‘impose’ a solution and will see Kerry’s last ditch effort is an attempt to protect Israel from world opinion expressed in the UN applause when 2334 passed. None of this is intended as a criticism of the US or its policies, simply an illustration of significant potential divergence.

  3. Danielle Radicanin

    The bottom of the barrel has been selected to bolster a failed businessman with an IQ of a slug. The hearings were a mere formality. This has all been a show of smoke and mirrors.

  4. There are many reasons to believe that Trump’s choices for his cabinet will prove to be disastrous. If so, we would do well to remember the senators who consented to their taking office were complicit in making it possible.

    The United States senate – the world’s greatest deliberative body – what a crock.

  5. Capitalism is the Holy Grail. Americans are rugged individualists. Even Obama has lionized the last Cowboy President.

    • And yet the rugged individualists prostrate themselves before Trump as though he were a barbarian king. And the rural class welcomes him as though he were their old overlords, the plantation owners, arisen from the dead.

      It seems that no one believes himself more fanatically to be self-governing than a henchman, who waves around the whip handed him by a master.

Comments are closed.