Well, I think that the attacker was stopped at the chosen perimeter in this case. You can widen the perimeter, but I don't see how you can prevent a determined attacker from potentially killing/wounding people at the perimeter (unless you go down the path of the garrison state).
You think "Danish authorities were lax in providing security to a meeting that involved Lars Vilks"? The assigned body guards and police prevented the attacker from getting inside the meeting, he was reduced to shooting from the outside. Unless you want to turn the entire country into a garrison state with stop-and-frisk of everybody everywhere, you cannot guarantee that nothing bad will ever happen. I really hope the general reaction will not be like yours. There's a cost to living in a free country. And yes, I am Danish, so I am not just asking somebody else to potentially pay that cost.
Well, I think that the attacker was stopped at the chosen perimeter in this case. You can widen the perimeter, but I don't see how you can prevent a determined attacker from potentially killing/wounding people at the perimeter (unless you go down the path of the garrison state).
You think "Danish authorities were lax in providing security to a meeting that involved Lars Vilks"? The assigned body guards and police prevented the attacker from getting inside the meeting, he was reduced to shooting from the outside. Unless you want to turn the entire country into a garrison state with stop-and-frisk of everybody everywhere, you cannot guarantee that nothing bad will ever happen. I really hope the general reaction will not be like yours. There's a cost to living in a free country. And yes, I am Danish, so I am not just asking somebody else to potentially pay that cost.