It will be interesting to see how the far right fragments as a result of this. Can Bannon still be a player without Mercers' backing? We will find out. Really looking forward to the real story about why Trump parted ways with is personal security goon.
He said it involved people who had undergone intense interrogation. Right now some on the right are citing this as proof of GW Bush's directives being successful but the pertinent information was obtained much later through easy interrogations. You can look at the Inspector General's report on this and the details of those who were waterboarded.
You are mistaken. He is saying that it was a legal killing of the leader of a para-statal organization which declared war on the United States. Assassinations are illegal. This is entirely legal under Article 42 and Article 57 of the UN Charter. The target was engaged in directing terrorist operations against the US. It was legal for the US to KILL him deliberately.
It will be interesting to see how the far right fragments as a result of this. Can Bannon still be a player without Mercers' backing? We will find out. Really looking forward to the real story about why Trump parted ways with is personal security goon.
He said it involved people who had undergone intense interrogation. Right now some on the right are citing this as proof of GW Bush's directives being successful but the pertinent information was obtained much later through easy interrogations. You can look at the Inspector General's report on this and the details of those who were waterboarded.
You are mistaken. He is saying that it was a legal killing of the leader of a para-statal organization which declared war on the United States. Assassinations are illegal. This is entirely legal under Article 42 and Article 57 of the UN Charter. The target was engaged in directing terrorist operations against the US. It was legal for the US to KILL him deliberately.