"Getting it good and hard" is sexual innuendo. The implication is that the common people will get screwed over, and when it happens it will be their own fault.
Your rejoinder to #9 is nonresponsive. It could be the case
that Afghans want us in the country because the country would be
less secure w/o us, even if we don't provide much security in the
first instance.
they don't have standing to challenge the IRS.
the drone strikes are part of warfare; they're not punitive, so most of your objections are simply inapplicable.
the rabbi you mention isn't "Israel's chief rabbi;" he's chief rabbi for a UK organization.
Pretty convincing. Thanks.
"Getting it good and hard" is sexual innuendo. The implication is that the common people will get screwed over, and when it happens it will be their own fault.
You forgot to mention that Santorum does not permit, aid, and abet child rape.
Your rejoinder to #9 is nonresponsive. It could be the case
that Afghans want us in the country because the country would be
less secure w/o us, even if we don't provide much security in the
first instance.