A good military policy would be to ALWAYS provide humanitarian aid and fire on militants targeting civilian populations. The US pick its battles primarily for self interest, for which it cannot declare any moral high ground when it is in someone else's backyard.
We owe Iraq for what the W administration pulled off in the name of promoting democracy. In the aftermath of the invasion it became clear that we cared nothing for Iraq.
So yes Juan, you may rebuke us for destroying that country for our own security but why stir up dissent when we try to do the right thing?
Why have they not been put on trial? Why are the journalists and critics silent? I can think of no greater crime committed in modern history.
A good military policy would be to ALWAYS provide humanitarian aid and fire on militants targeting civilian populations. The US pick its battles primarily for self interest, for which it cannot declare any moral high ground when it is in someone else's backyard.
We owe Iraq for what the W administration pulled off in the name of promoting democracy. In the aftermath of the invasion it became clear that we cared nothing for Iraq.
So yes Juan, you may rebuke us for destroying that country for our own security but why stir up dissent when we try to do the right thing?